CVE-2026-63670

CVE-2026-63670 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in sanitize-html (npm), affecting versions <= 2.17.5. It is fixed in 2.17.6.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

ApostropheCMS: Mutation-XSS / allowedTags bypass via literal </textarea/> solidus close

A mutation-XSS / allowedTags bypass: when textarea (or xmp) is included in allowedTags, an input containing a literal </textarea/> (a solidus right after the RCDATA end-tag name) lets non-allowed markup such as <img src=x onerror=…> pass through sanitizeHtml() live and unescaped, even though img/onerror are not in the allowlist. A spec-compliant browser executes the surviving handler, XSS. This is a literal-solidus variant that bypasses the two most recent fixes in this code area (CVE-2026-40186, CVE-2026-44990), both already applied in 2.17.5. The default configuration is not affected.

Details

sanitize-html emits the text content of HTML raw-text elements (textarea, xmp) without escaping. Two things combine:

  • Parser differential: on input, htmlparser2 does NOT recognize </textarea/> (solidus after the RCDATA
    end-tag name) as a close tag; it emits </textarea/><img …> as a single raw-text node.
  • Unescaped passthrough: the ontext handler (index.js ~575-583) appends textarea/xmp content with
    result += text (no escapeHtml), assuming it is "already properly encoded", true for entity-decoded
    content (what CVE-2026-40186 fixed) but false for this mis-tokenized literal close tag.
    A spec browser treats </textarea/> as a valid textarea close, so the following <img onerror> is parsed as a live element. The recent fixes addressed entity-encoding (CVE-2026-40186) and the xmp default (CVE-2026-44990); neither covers the literal-solidus mis-tokenization, so the raw passthrough still leaks.

PoC

// npm i [email protected] parse5 && node poc.js
const sanitizeHtml = require('sanitize-html');
const input = '<textarea></textarea/><img src=x onerror="alert(document.domain)">';
const opts  = { allowedTags: sanitizeHtml.defaults.allowedTags.concat(['textarea']) };  // img NOT allowed
console.log(sanitizeHtml(input, opts));
// => <textarea></textarea/><img src=x onerror="alert(document.domain)"></textarea>
//    the <img onerror> survives live and unescaped

console.log(sanitizeHtml(input));   // default config (no textarea allowed) => ""  (safe)

Re-parsing the sanitized OUTPUT with parse5 (the WHATWG HTML parser browsers/jsdom use) yields a live
<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>
at body level (it escaped the textarea RCDATA, not inert text) → the onerror fires in a browser. Confirmed on 2.17.5 (Node v24). A canonical poc.js is attached.

Impact

Cross-site scripting (CWE-79). Requires textarea (or xmp) in allowedTags, a benign-looking, common addition in form builders, CMS, and rich-text editors. Adding a harmless tag that then enables XSS via non-allowed img/onerror breaks the sanitizer's core contract; the maintainers have fixed this class before (e.g. GHSA-9mrh). An attacker who can submit content rendered through such a configuration achieves stored/reflected XSS (cookie theft, session hijack). Severity Medium (default config is safe; user interaction to view the page). Suggested fix: route textarea/xmp content through escapeHtml instead of the raw passthrough, and/or fix the htmlparser2 </tag/> RCDATA end-tag tokenization to match the WHATWG spec.

Untrusted input is rendered as active markup in a victim's browser, which can run script in their session. Typical impact: session or credential theft, and actions taken as the user.

CVE-2026-63670 has a CVSS score of 6.1 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.17.6); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

sanitize-html (<= 2.17.5)

Security releases

sanitize-html → 2.17.6 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade sanitize-html to 2.17.6 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-63670? CVE-2026-63670 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in sanitize-html (npm), affecting versions <= 2.17.5. It is fixed in 2.17.6. Untrusted input is rendered as active markup in a victim's browser, which can run script in their session.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-63670? CVE-2026-63670 has a CVSS score of 6.1 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of sanitize-html are affected by CVE-2026-63670? sanitize-html (npm) versions <= 2.17.5 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-63670? Yes. CVE-2026-63670 is fixed in 2.17.6. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-63670 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-63670 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-63670 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-63670? Upgrade sanitize-html to 2.17.6 or later.

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.