CVE-2026-114141

toml.parse() is vulnerable to a quadratic-complexity (O(n²)) denial-of-service via many
array-of-tables ([[name]]) headers. addTableArray() in lib/compiler.js rescans two
entire bookkeeping Sets on every [[name]] header without pruning unrelated or distinct
entries, so a document containing n such headers costs O(n²) compiler work. A ~321KB document
of 20,000 distinct-named [[name]] blocks takes ~10.3 seconds to parse, a completely
ordinary-looking TOML shape (a flat settings block plus one or more array-of-tables sections),
not a contrived edge case. This is a separate, unpatched code path from the previously fixed
stack-overflow DoS (GHSA-82x6-q7mm-w9cf) and requires no key nesting or dotted keys at all.

Affected component / version

• Package: toml (npm), repository BinaryMuse/toml-node
• Function: addTableArray() in lib/compiler.js
• Confirmed present in the audited checkout at commit 1b2ac40 (2026-07-16), one commit past
  the v5.0.0 tag (a changelog-only change), i.e. present in v5.0.0, the latest release.
  Not exhaustively verified against every prior release, but the affected function is
  unrelated to v5.0.0's BigInt/Temporal changes (per CHANGELOG.md), so the defect likely
  predates that release as well.

Details

toml.parse(input, options) (index.js:5-9) forwards the caller-supplied string to
parser.parse() and then compiler.compile() with no length or structural validation. Every
[[name]] (array-of-tables) header is routed (reduce(), lib/compiler.js:43) to
addTableArray() (lib/compiler.js:218-245), which performs two full linear scans on every
call:

assignedPaths.forEach(function(p) {
  if (isSameOrSubPath(p, quotedPath)) assignedPaths.delete(p);
});
valueAssignments.forEach(function(p) {
  if (isSameOrSubPath(p, quotedPath)) valueAssignments.delete(p);
});

(lib/compiler.js:228-233)

assignedPaths and valueAssignments accumulate one entry per top-level key/table/array path
ever assigned in the entire document. Each scan prunes only entries matching the currently
reopened path via isSameOrSubPath() (lib/compiler.js:319-321: path === prefix || path.indexOf(prefix + ".") === 0); anything else, an unrelated top-level key, or simply a
different array-of-tables name, is never removed and is rescanned in full on every
subsequent [[name]] header for the rest of the parse. Set.prototype.forEach has no early
exit, so this is unconditionally O(current Set size) on every call, giving O(n²) total work
for n such headers.

Proof of Concept

The sharpest reproduction needs no unrelated keys at all, just N array-of-tables headers with
N distinct names, since nothing is ever pruned when no name repeats:

const toml = require('toml');

function distinctArrayHeaders(n) {
  let out = '';
  for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) out += `[[a${i}]]\nv = 1\n`;
  return out;
}

// ~321 KB input -- takes ~10.3 seconds
toml.parse(distinctArrayHeaders(20000));

Measured timings (Node, direct execution against this repo):

The ~130x gap between the distinct-name and same-name cases at identical N and comparable
input size isolates the mechanism precisely: the bug is unbounded Set growth from never-pruned
entries, not string length or any other confound. A product-law check (varying M and N
independently in the mixed variant) further confirmed genuine O(M·N) complexity.

Suggested remediation

Avoid scanning the entire assignedPaths/valueAssignments Sets on every [[name]] header.
Index entries by their top-level path segment (e.g. a Map<string, Set<string>> keyed by the
first key component) so addTableArray() only ever scans the bucket relevant to the path
being reopened, in time proportional to that bucket's size rather than the whole document's
accumulated path count:

var assignedByRoot = new Map(); // root segment -> Set<fullPath>

function addTableArray(node) {
  var path = node.value;
  var root = path[0];
  var bucket = assignedByRoot.get(root) || new Set();
  bucket.forEach(function(p) {
    if (isSameOrSubPath(p, quotedPath)) bucket.delete(p);
  });
  // ...rest of addTableArray unchanged, reading/writing the per-root bucket
  // instead of the global assignedPaths/valueAssignments Sets
}

As with the sibling finding, an input-size or table-count limit would also help as
defense-in-depth.

Credit

Discovered and reported by SecDim Security Research
secdim.com | @secdim | [email protected]