CVE-2026-114143

CVE-2026-114143 is a high-severity security vulnerability in toml (npm), affecting versions <= 5.0.0. It is fixed in 5.0.1.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

toml-node: Quadratic-complexity DoS via long dotted keys or table paths in toml.parse()

toml.parse() is vulnerable to a quadratic-complexity (O(n²)) denial-of-service via a single
long dotted key, table header, or inline-table key. A ~100KB crafted document causes a
multi-second synchronous hang; a ~200KB document crashes the Node.js process outright with an
uncatchable out-of-memory error. This is a separate, unpatched code path from the previously
fixed stack-overflow DoS (GHSA-82x6-q7mm-w9cf), it requires no array/inline-table nesting at
all, and is confirmed unaffected by the maxDepth option that fixed that earlier issue.

Affected component / version

  • Package: toml (npm), repository BinaryMuse/toml-node
  • Functions: assign(), deepRef(), setNestedKey() in lib/compiler.js
  • Confirmed present in the audited checkout at commit 1b2ac40 (2026-07-16), one commit past
    the v5.0.0 tag (a changelog-only change), i.e. present in v5.0.0, the latest release.
    Not exhaustively verified against every prior release, but the affected functions are
    unrelated to v5.0.0's BigInt/Temporal changes (per CHANGELOG.md), so the defect likely
    predates that release as well.

Details

toml.parse(input, options) (index.js:5-9) forwards the caller-supplied string to
parser.parse() and then compiler.compile() with no length or structural validation.
Inside lib/compiler.js, three separate functions each walk a dotted key's segments in a
for loop and, on every iteration, recompute the full path-prefix string from scratch:

  • assign() (lines 69-107, the sink at line 81): var intermediatePath = makeFullPath(keys.slice(0, i + 1));, reached for top-level dotted-key assignments like
    a.b.c = 1.
  • deepRef() (lines 247-281, the sink at line 252): the identical pattern via
    pathKey(keys.slice(0, i + 1)), reached from table headers [a.b.c] and array-of-tables
    [[a.b.c]] via setPath()/addTableArray().
  • setNestedKey() (lines 184-202, the sink at line 187): the identical pattern, reached from
    inline-table dotted keys like t = { a.b.c = 1 }.

keys.slice(0, i + 1) allocates a new array of length i; pathKey()/makeFullPath()
(lines 311-317) then does .map(quoteDottedString).join("."), also O(i). Since this runs on
every one of the n segments of a dotted key, total work is O(1 + 2 + ... + n) = O(n²), not
O(n). The string is computed unconditionally on the happy path (only ever used if an error
is about to be thrown), so there is no early exit that makes this cheap in practice.

No limit exists anywhere on dotted-key segment count: dot_ended_table_key_part+ and
inline_dot_key_part+ in src/toml.pegjs (lines 122, 311) are unbounded + repetitions,
parsed iteratively rather than through the grammar's value rule, so the existing
MAX_DEPTH/maxDepth nesting guard (src/toml.pegjs:141-151, enforced in the generated
lib/parser.js:1022) does not apply to key length at all. We confirmed this directly: setting
options.maxDepth: 1 (the strictest possible value) against a 16,000-segment key produced no
measurable timing difference from the unrestricted case.

Proof of Concept

const toml = require('toml');

// n-segment dotted key: "k0.k1.k2. ... .k{n-1} = 1"
function segKey(n) {
  const parts = [];
  for (let i = 0; i < n; i++) parts.push('k' + i);
  return parts.join('.') + ' = 1\n';
}

// ~100.9 KB input -- takes ~6.6-6.8 seconds
toml.parse(segKey(16000));

// ~200 KB input -- crashes the Node process:
// "FATAL ERROR: Ineffective mark-compacts near heap limit - JavaScript heap out of memory"
toml.parse(segKey(32000));

Measured timings (Node v22, direct execution against this repo):

n (segments) input size time
1,000 ~4.9 KB 34 ms
8,000 ~46.9 KB 1.6 s
16,000 ~100.9 KB 6.8 s
32,000 ~200 KB process crash (OOM)

Doubling n from 8,000→16,000 roughly quadruples runtime (~4.2x), the signature of O(n²)
rather than the expected O(n) (~2x). Independently reproduced with the identical scaling
signature for the table-header variant ([k0. ... .k15999], exercising deepRef()) and the
inline-table variant (t = { k0. ... .k15999 = 1 }, exercising setNestedKey()).

We also generalized this into a property-based fuzzing harness (fast-check, run under Node)
that automatically tests the "doubling input size should not more than roughly double parse
time" invariant across 12 structural dimensions of the grammar/compiler; it independently
re-flags all three code paths above on every run, with no additional dimension confirmed
vulnerable after follow-up investigation. The harness is available on request.

Suggested remediation

Build the path prefix as an incrementally-extended string as the loop walks each segment
(append one already-quoted segment per iteration to a running string) instead of re-slicing an
array and re-joining the entire prefix from scratch on every iteration. For example, in
assign():

function assign(node) {
  var keys = node.key;
  var value = node.value;
  var off = node.offset;
  if (!Array.isArray(keys)) keys = [keys];
  var reduced = reduceValueNode(value);

  var target = context;
  var pathStr = pathKey(currentPath); // computed once, not per segment
  for (var i = 0; i < keys.length - 1; i++) {
    var k = keys[i];
    var quotedK = quoteDottedString(k);
    var intermediatePath = pathStr ? pathStr + "." + quotedK : quotedK; // O(new segment), not O(i)
    pathStr = intermediatePath;
    // ...same conditional logic as today, using intermediatePath
    target = target[k];
  }
  // ...
}

The identical treatment applies to deepRef() and setNestedKey(). As defense-in-depth,
consider also capping total key-segment count or overall input size, the same way maxDepth
already caps nesting.

Credit

Discovered and reported by SecDim Security Research
secdim.com | @secdim | [email protected]

Impact

Node.js is single-threaded, a synchronous multi-second-to-crashing parse() call blocks the
entire event loop of the process calling it, stalling every other request/operation that
process is handling, not just the attacker's own. At the upper end this is not merely a hang:
an uncaught, process-terminating out-of-memory crash from a ~200KB attacker-supplied string is
a full denial of service requiring no authentication, just the ability to get one string
parsed by an application using this library (config upload, API request body, imported
manifest, or any of this library's intended use cases).

Affected versions

toml (<= 5.0.0)

Security releases

toml → 5.0.1 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade toml to 5.0.1 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-114143? CVE-2026-114143 is a high-severity security vulnerability in toml (npm), affecting versions <= 5.0.0. It is fixed in 5.0.1.
  2. Which versions of toml are affected by CVE-2026-114143? toml (npm) versions <= 5.0.0 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-114143? Yes. CVE-2026-114143 is fixed in 5.0.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is CVE-2026-114143 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-114143 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-114143 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix CVE-2026-114143? Upgrade toml to 5.0.1 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in toml

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.