CVE-2026-45309

CVE-2026-45309 is a medium-severity path traversal vulnerability in asyncssh (pip), affecting versions = 2.22.0. It is fixed in 2.23.0.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

AsyncSSH AuthorizedKeysFile %u path traversal allows attacker-selected authorized keys to authenticate a traversal username

AsyncSSH 2.22.0 expands the OpenSSH-compatible AuthorizedKeysFile %u token with the raw SSH username during pre-authentication server config reload. A server configured with a documented per-user key pattern such as AuthorizedKeysFile authorized_keys/%u can be made to read an authorized-keys file outside the intended directory when the SSH username contains path traversal segments. If the attacker can place or reference a readable authorized-keys-format file containing their public key, the attacker can authenticate over SSH as the traversal username.

Affected Product

  • Package: asyncssh
  • Ecosystem: pip
  • Affected versions: confirmed on 2.22.0; exact lower bound not finalized
  • Tested version: 2.22.0
  • Audit commit/tag: tag v2.22.0, commit af5a81e669633d83d535163f93b6bf3f957c9238
  • PyPI sdist SHA256: c3ce72b01be4f97b40e62844dd384227e5ff5a401a3793007c42f86a5c8eb537

Vulnerability Details

  • CWE: CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory
  • Component: AsyncSSH server config reload and public-key authentication (asyncssh/config.py, asyncssh/connection.py, asyncssh/auth_keys.py, asyncssh/misc.py)
  • Root cause: %u in AuthorizedKeysFile is expanded from the remote username without rejecting path separators or .. segments, and the resulting path is opened without constraining it to the intended authorized-keys directory.
  • Security boundary violated: the configured authorized-keys directory and public-key authentication trust boundary.
  • Direct impact: public-key authentication succeeds using an attacker-selected authorized-keys file outside the intended directory.
  • Chain impact, if any: none claimed; direct authentication impact is primary.

Attack Preconditions

  • The AsyncSSH server uses a config or equivalent pattern where AuthorizedKeysFile contains %u, for example AuthorizedKeysFile authorized_keys/%u.
  • Public-key authentication is enabled.
  • The attacker can place or reference a readable authorized-keys-format file outside the intended directory, such as a file in a world-writable or application-writable location.
  • The application does not separately reject usernames containing /, \, or .. before AsyncSSH uses the username for key-file selection.

Reproduction

The run-scoped evidence contains a safe localhost proof:

  1. Start the proof harness saved at
    harness_app.py

  2. Run
    exploit_proof.py
    through
    run_proof.sh

  3. The harness creates sshd_config with AuthorizedKeysFile authorized_keys/%u, writes the attacker's public key to a file outside authorized_keys/, starts a real AsyncSSH server, and attempts two SSH logins.

  4. Expected result: the normal username victim fails, while the traversal username authenticates with the same attacker key.

Observed proof output:

[CONTROL] username=victim success=False
[ATTACK] username=../../../asyncssh-proof-exploit-proof-8b2bd23daeeb.pub success=True
[ATTACK] output=AUTH_BYPASS_SUCCESS username=../../../asyncssh-proof-exploit-proof-8b2bd23daeeb.pub
PASS: traversal username authenticated with attacker-controlled authorized_keys file

Impact

Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files. Typical impact: unauthorized file read or write outside the intended directory.

Affected versions

asyncssh (= 2.22.0)

Security releases

asyncssh → 2.23.0 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade asyncssh to 2.23.0 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-45309? CVE-2026-45309 is a medium-severity path traversal vulnerability in asyncssh (pip), affecting versions = 2.22.0. It is fixed in 2.23.0. Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files.
  2. Which versions of asyncssh are affected by CVE-2026-45309? asyncssh (pip) versions = 2.22.0 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-45309? Yes. CVE-2026-45309 is fixed in 2.23.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is CVE-2026-45309 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-45309 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-45309 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix CVE-2026-45309? Upgrade asyncssh to 2.23.0 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in asyncssh

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.