CVE-2026-54451

CVE-2026-54451 is a high-severity security vulnerability in protobuf (erlang), affecting versions >= 0.8.0, < 0.16.1. It is fixed in 0.16.1.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Protobuf: Unbounded recursion depth in embedded-message decoding

Unbounded recursion depth in Protobuf.Decoder (Hex package protobuf, versions >= 0.8.0, < 0.16.1) lets an unauthenticated attacker crash any service that decodes untrusted protobuf messages whose schema contains a self-referential or cyclic message type. A small request body (a few KB to a few MB) that nests an embedded field hundreds of thousands to millions of levels deep forces the BEAM to recurse once per level, exhausting memory and pinning a scheduler. A handful of such requests can take the node offline (a request-amplification denial of service).

Details

Protobuf.Decoder.value_for_field/3 handles embedded message fields in its embedded?: true branch at lib/protobuf/decoder.ex:218-243. For an embedded field it calls decode(bin, type) recursively, which re-enters build_message → handle_value → value_for_field. The recursive call is not in tail position (its result is consumed by the surrounding decode after it returns), so every nesting level retains a live frame on the process stack and heap.

There is no recursion-depth counter anywhere in the decoder. For any schema with a self-referential message type (e.g. message Tree { Tree child = 1; }, a common shape for comment threads, org charts, file trees, and ASTs) or any cycle of message types, the attacker controls the nesting depth entirely through the input bytes. Each additional level costs only a 1-byte field tag plus a varint length prefix, so depth grows roughly inversely with payload size: a tiny body buys an enormous recursion depth.

Reference protobuf implementations (Google's C++, Java, etc.) cap recursion at 100 specifically to prevent this. The Elixir decoder enforces no comparable bound, so the recursion continues until the process exhausts memory, blows the stack, or starves the scheduler doing GC over the deep structure.

The fix threads a depth counter through decode / build_message / handle_value / value_for_field (or holds it in the process dictionary for the duration of the top-level decode) and raises Protobuf.DecodeError once it exceeds a configurable limit, defaulting to 100 to match the reference implementations.

PoC

  1. Define a self-referential schema: defmodule Tree do use Protobuf, syntax: :proto3; field(:child, 1, type: Tree) end.
  2. Build a wire-format body inner-to-outer: at each of depth levels prepend <<0x0A, length_varint(inner_size), inner>> (tag 0x0A = field 1, wire type 2). Use an iolist with a running byte-size to keep generation O(depth).
  3. POST the body (a few MB at depth = 1_000_000) as application/x-protobuf to any endpoint that calls Tree.decode/1.
  4. The non-tail decode(bin, type) in value_for_field/3 re-enters once per nesting level, accumulating a frame per level. The decode burns seconds of CPU and hundreds of MB on the victim node; a few concurrent requests exhaust it.

Resources

Impact

Unauthenticated, network-reachable request-amplification denial of service against any service that decodes attacker-influenced protobuf bytes into a self-referential or cyclic message type. A single small request can consume seconds of CPU and hundreds of MB of memory on the victim; a few concurrent requests can take the node offline.

Affected versions

protobuf (>= 0.8.0, < 0.16.1)

Security releases

protobuf → 0.16.1 (erlang)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade protobuf to 0.16.1 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-54451? CVE-2026-54451 is a high-severity security vulnerability in protobuf (erlang), affecting versions >= 0.8.0, < 0.16.1. It is fixed in 0.16.1.
  2. Which versions of protobuf are affected by CVE-2026-54451? protobuf (erlang) versions >= 0.8.0, < 0.16.1 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-54451? Yes. CVE-2026-54451 is fixed in 0.16.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is CVE-2026-54451 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-54451 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-54451 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix CVE-2026-54451? Upgrade protobuf to 0.16.1 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in protobuf

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.