Summary
Using untrusted, non-normalized input as-is for metrics data (such as metric names, tag keys, or...
Using untrusted, non-normalized input as-is for metrics data (such as metric names, tag keys, or tag values) is a dangerous antipattern that general-purpose instrumentation should never perform. When such unsafe instrumentation is used, the application becomes vulnerable to injection and spoofing attacks because micrometer-registry-statsd and micrometer-core do not sanitize newline characters (\n, \r) by default prior to this fix.
- For the StatsD registry in micrometer-registry-statsd (when using the Datadog or Etsy flavor), because the StatsD protocol is newline-delimited, this allows for line-protocol injection (cross-metric spoofing).
- For LoggingMeterRegistry in micrometer-core, because metric output is printed line-by-line to log files, this allows for both metric spoofing (if downstream log-metrics scrapers or parsers ingest the log lines as separate metrics) and general log spoofing.
Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all the following are true:
- The application uses a vulnerable version of io.micrometer:micrometer-registry-statsd or io.micrometer:micrometer-core.
- The application uses the Datadog or Etsy flavor of the StatsD registry, or uses LoggingMeterRegistry.
- The application instruments meters using user-controlled, unvalidated input for metric names, tag keys, or tag values.
When vulnerable, an attacker can break out of the current metric or log line by injecting line terminators. This allows them to spoof arbitrary metrics (e.g., system load, standard JVM metrics, or other business metrics) across the metrics registry namespace (either directly via StatsD protocol or via downstream log-metric scrapers/parsers), as well as inject arbitrary log entries to spoof general log records.
Impact
CVE-2026-59296 has a CVSS score of 5.9 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-59296? CVE-2026-59296 is a medium-severity security vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet.
- How severe is CVE-2026-59296? CVE-2026-59296 has a CVSS score of 5.9 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-59296? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2026-59296 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2026-59296 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-59296 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-59296 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.