Summary
Lemur: Any user can revoke arbitrary certificates at the CA by uploading a duplicate record and revoking it
Repo under test: https://github.com/Netflix/lemur
PUT /api/1/certificates/<id>/revoke authorizes the caller against the Lemur database row (creator == current user, or CertificatePermission over the row's roles) rather than the underlying CA-side certificate identity. Separately, POST /api/1/certificates/upload lets any user passing StrictRolePermission create a new Certificate row while freely supplying body, authority (resolved by id/name with no AuthorityPermission check) and external_id; there is no uniqueness constraint on body, serial, or external_id.
An attacker can therefore read a target certificate's public body, authority.id, and external_id via GET /certificates/<id>, upload a duplicate row, and revoke that duplicate. The creator-bypass skips CertificatePermission, the empty-endpoints check passes because the duplicate has none, and service.revoke() then revokes at the CA using the attacker-supplied body (ACME) or external_id (DigiCert/Entrust/Google CA/CFSSL) under the authority's stored CA credentials, revoking the real production certificate.
Affected route
POST /api/1/certificates/upload → PUT /api/1/certificates/<dup_id>/revoke
Affected code
lemur/certificates/views.py:651, onlyStrictRolePermission().can()gates upload; noAuthorityPermissionchecklemur/certificates/schemas.py:391,CertificateUploadInputSchemaaccepts caller-suppliedauthorityandexternal_idlemur/schemas.py:107,AssociatedAuthoritySchemaresolves any authority by id/name with no permission checklemur/certificates/service.py:489,upload()binds the caller-supplied authority onto the new rowlemur/certificates/models.py:119, onlynameis unique;body/serial/external_idare not, andget_or_increase_name()auto-suffixes on collisionlemur/certificates/views.py:1677,if g.current_user != cert.user: ... CertificatePermission ..., creator of the duplicate row bypasses the owner checklemur/certificates/views.py:1687,if cert.endpoints: ..., duplicate row has no endpoints, so the deployed-cert safeguard is bypassedlemur/certificates/service.py:1120,plugin = plugins.get(certificate.authority.plugin_name); plugin.revoke_certificate(certificate, reason)lemur/plugins/lemur_acme/acme_handlers.py:268, ACME revokes bycertificate.bodylemur/plugins/lemur_digicert/plugin.py:477,lemur/plugins/lemur_entrust/plugin.py:321, commercial CAs revoke bycertificate.external_idlemur/certificates/schemas.py:290,CertificateOutputSchemaexposesexternal_id,body,authorityto any authenticated user
Root cause
Revocation authority is bound to ownership of the Lemur DB row, not to the CA-side certificate identity. Because upload allows creating a second row that aliases the same CA-side certificate (same body / external_id / authority) without any uniqueness constraint or AuthorityPermission check, the attacker can manufacture a row they own and then exercise the creator-bypass on revoke. The endpoint-attached guard inspects only the duplicate row's cert.endpoints, which is empty.
Validated evidence
Static path trace, confirmed by code inspection (validation status: CONFIRMED):
- Upload is gated only by
StrictRolePermission(default-open to any non-read-only user) and accepts attacker-chosenauthority+external_id+bodywithout anAuthorityPermissioncheck. Certificate.body/external_idhave no uniqueness constraint, so a duplicate row is created.- The revoke endpoint short-circuits the owner check when caller is the row creator, and the endpoint-attached guard inspects only the duplicate row.
- Issuer plugins revoke at the CA using
body/external_idtaken from the duplicate row under the authority's stored CA credentials.
Proof of concept / reproducer
Status: reconstructed from source report (static control-flow trace; not executed against a live CA, revoking at a real CA is destructive).
Preconditions: attacker is an authenticated Lemur user holding any role other than read-only. <VICTIM_CERT_ID> is any certificate id readable via GET /api/1/certificates.
# 1. Read the victim's body / authority / external_id (exposed to any authenticated user)
curl -sS "<TARGET_BASE_URL>/api/1/certificates/<VICTIM_CERT_ID>" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <AUTH_TOKEN>" \
| jq '{body, external_id, authority: .authority.id}'
# 2. Upload a duplicate row aliasing the same CA-side certificate
curl -sS -X POST "<TARGET_BASE_URL>/api/1/certificates/upload" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <AUTH_TOKEN>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"name": "victim-dup",
"owner": "[email protected]",
"body": "<VICTIM_BODY_PEM>",
"authority": {"id": <VICTIM_AUTHORITY_ID>},
"externalId": "<VICTIM_EXTERNAL_ID>"
}'
# → returns {"id": <DUP_ID>, ...}; attacker is now cert.user of <DUP_ID>
# 3. Revoke the duplicate, issuer plugin revokes at the CA by body/external_id
curl -sS -X PUT "<TARGET_BASE_URL>/api/1/certificates/<DUP_ID>/revoke" \
-H "Authorization: Bearer <AUTH_TOKEN>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"crlReason": "unspecified"}'
Static-trace validation command from the source report:
grep -n 'StrictRolePermission' lemur/certificates/views.py | grep -v Authority
grep -n 'cert.authority = kwargs.get' lemur/certificates/service.py
grep -n 'g.current_user != cert.user' lemur/certificates/views.py
grep -n 'certificate.external_id\|certificate.body' \
lemur/plugins/lemur_acme/acme_handlers.py \
lemur/plugins/lemur_digicert/plugin.py \
lemur/plugins/lemur_entrust/plugin.py
Source artifact: audit/harnesses/public-repo-threat-model-harness/results/netflix-lemur-100run-mythos-20260627T051129Z/findings.jsonl (run_050, finding cluster lemur-revoke-via-duplicate, 2/100 runs).
Impact
A low-privileged authenticated insider (or holder of a stolen non-admin token/API key) can revoke any certificate managed by Lemur, including high-value certificates they do not own and certificates currently attached to live endpoints, directly at the issuing CA. Iterating over GET /certificates yields fleet-wide revocation (mass DoS of TLS endpoints) without ever passing an AuthorityPermission or CertificatePermission check on the victim certificate. This is exactly the "Revocation as DoS vector" scenario flagged in the threat model and additionally defeats the built-in "cannot revoke while attached to endpoint" safeguard.
CVE-2026-71417 has a CVSS score of 7.3 (High). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.9.3); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Decouple CA-side revocation authority from Lemur row ownership:
- On
POST /certificates/upload, ifauthorityis supplied enforceAuthorityPermissionfor that authority, and reject/ignore caller-suppliedexternal_id. - Before calling
plugin.revoke_certificate, look up allCertificaterows sharing the same(authority_id, serial)orbodyand requireCertificatePermissionon every match (and run the endpoint-attached check against all matches). - Consider a DB uniqueness constraint or dedup on
(authority_id, serial)so a second row for the same CA-issued certificate cannot be created. - Stop exposing
external_idinCertificateOutputSchemato non-owners.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-71417? CVE-2026-71417 is a high-severity security vulnerability in lemur (pip), affecting versions <= 1.9.2. It is fixed in 1.9.3.
- How severe is CVE-2026-71417? CVE-2026-71417 has a CVSS score of 7.3 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of lemur are affected by CVE-2026-71417? lemur (pip) versions <= 1.9.2 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-71417? Yes. CVE-2026-71417 is fixed in 1.9.3. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-71417 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-71417 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-71417 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-71417? Upgrade
lemurto 1.9.3 or later.