CVE-2026-73557

CVE-2026-73557 is a medium-severity race condition vulnerability in vllm (pip), affecting versions >= 0.21.0, < 0.26.0. It is fixed in 0.26.0.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

vLLM: Incomplete CVE-2025-62164 remediation can be bypassed by concurrent prompt parts

Executive Summary

The follow-up protection for CVE-2025-62164 is incomplete at vLLM revision 26587f9519e22a5c4549ead7595ad9ca3229c4fd. It wraps serialized prompt-embedding reconstruction and dense conversion in torch.sparse.check_sparse_tensor_invariants(), but PyTorch 2.11.0 implements that context with save/enable/restore operations over process-global state. Two prompt-embedding parts in one /v1/chat/completions request are gathered concurrently on the event loop's default executor. When one context exits before the other loads its tensor, it can restore the global flag to False while the second part remains inside its guard.

In a deterministic run against hash-verified source from the affected revision, the actual target loader rejected an invalid sparse payload as a negative control. The frozen chat tracker then scheduled benign and malicious parts on distinct asyncio_0 and asyncio_1 threads. The benign context exited, the malicious loader observed the invariant flag disabled, and torch.load(weights_only=True) reconstructed indices [[10], [10]] for a declared shape of [3, 3]. The run intercepted the target's to_dense() call before it operated on the invalid tensor.

This primary trigger requires --enable-prompt-embeds, which is default-off, but it does not require renderer_num_workers > 1, a multimodal model, or --enable-mm-embeds. API authentication is optional in the stock server: middleware is installed only when CLI or environment API keys are supplied.

The lab proves bypass of the follow-up guard, invalid sparse reconstruction, and guarded-sink reachability. Crash and memory-corruption consequences are conditional on the behavior documented by the published CVE.

Background

CVE-2025-62164 / GHSA-mrw7-hf4f-83pf concerns client-controlled serialized prompt_embeds reaching torch.load(weights_only=True) and an invalid sparse tensor reaching to_dense(). The advisory attributes memory corruption, denial of service, and potential code execution to that historical unsafe operation.

The remediation chronology matters for duplicate handling:

This report therefore does not present the malformed sparse payload or to_dense() sink as new. It reports a distinct concurrency root cause and trigger: unsynchronized save/enable/restore of the process-global follow-up guard, reachable through the later multi-part chat scheduler.

The affected revision pins PyTorch 2.11.0 in pyproject.toml:10.

Vulnerability Details

The target's safe_load_prompt_embeds performs the guarded operation in vllm/renderers/embed_utils.py:16-39:

with torch.sparse.check_sparse_tensor_invariants():
    tensor = torch.load(
        BytesIO(pybase64.b64decode(embed, validate=True)),
        weights_only=True,
        map_location=torch.device("cpu"),
    )
    if not isinstance(tensor, torch.Tensor):
        raise VLLMValidationError(...)
    tensor = tensor.to_dense()

The context is not request-local. With the global flag initially disabled, we can describe the verified interleaving:

  1. Benign part A enters, saves False, and enables the flag.
  2. Malicious part B enters, saves True, and leaves the flag enabled.
  3. A completes its load and exits, restoring its saved False value.
  4. B remains lexically inside its context but observes the actual global flag as False.
  5. B's torch.load(..., weights_only=True) reconstructs the malformed sparse tensor.
  6. The target reaches tensor.to_dense() before later rank, hidden-size, and dtype checks.

weights_only=True constrains deserialization types; it does not compensate for a sparse invariant check that another request has disabled.

The complete stock actor-to-sink chain, traced in the affected source, is:

POST /v1/chat/completions (vllm/entrypoints/openai/chat_completion/api_router.py:41-61) -> OpenAIServingChat.create_chat_completion -> _create_chat_completion -> render_chat_request (vllm/entrypoints/openai/chat_completion/serving.py:206-280) -> OnlineRenderer.render_chat (vllm/renderers/online_renderer.py:95-190) -> preprocess_chat (vllm/renderers/online_renderer.py:335-380) -> BaseRenderer.render_chat_async (vllm/renderers/base.py:1070-1105) -> HfRenderer.render_messages_async (vllm/renderers/hf.py:1049-1085) -> parse_chat_messages_async (vllm/entrypoints/chat_utils.py:1911-1945) -> content-part parse_prompt_embeds and _load_prompt_embeds_async (vllm/entrypoints/chat_utils.py:1099-1120) -> AsyncMultiModalItemTracker.resolve_items (vllm/entrypoints/chat_utils.py:818-835) -> asyncio.gather of both prompt parts -> safe_load_prompt_embeds_async -> make_async -> loop.run_in_executor(executor=None, ...) (vllm/utils/async_utils.py:28-45) -> guarded torch.load -> to_dense().

The prompt async helper is created without an explicit executor, so it uses the event loop's default executor. This path is separate from the renderer's configurable pool. The deterministic scheduler run observed the two parts on distinct default-executor threads while leaving renderer_num_workers at its default of one.

prompt_embeds bypasses multimodal processing, and the tracker explicitly permits it when is_multimodal_model=False (vllm/entrypoints/chat_utils.py:793-837). Consequently, the primary trigger needs neither a multimodal model nor enable_mm_embeds.

The source also states that async wrappers must be thread-safe (vllm/utils/async_utils.py:28-38), while a target test acknowledges that the sparse flag is not thread-local and concurrent users can leak state (tests/renderers/test_sparse_tensor_validation.py:58-61).

Exploitability Analysis

The following evidence labels separate what was demonstrated from what remains conditional:

Label Claim
Verified by run PyTorch 2.11.0 rejects the identical invalid payload through the actual target loader without the race.
Verified by run The hash-verified frozen tracker schedules two prompt parts on distinct default-executor threads, races the flag to False, reconstructs the invalid sparse tensor, and reaches the target to_dense() call while the interception prevents execution.
Traced in source A client can supply multiple prompt_embeds content parts through the stock /v1/chat/completions route and the function chain above.
Traced in source enable_prompt_embeds defaults to False (vllm/config/model.py:255-260), so the operator must opt in. enable_mm_embeds and non-default renderer workers are not preconditions for this path.
Traced in source api_key defaults to None (vllm/entrypoints/openai/cli_args.py:264), and authentication middleware is installed only when a CLI or environment key is present (vllm/entrypoints/openai/api_server.py:306-310). With a configured key, the attacker must authenticate; without one, the stock route has no API-key middleware.
Unrun A live HTTP/GPU server, real-world race win rate, unsafe dense conversion, process crash, memory corruption, and reliable code execution.

The feature is documented for trusted users, which narrows intended exposure. It is not a memory-safety boundary: a user authorized to submit embedding inputs should not be able to disable a process-wide invariant for concurrent work.

The current run proves the same invalid sparse object can cross the guard and reach the historical sink. If executing that sink retains the behavior described in CVE-2025-62164 for the deployed PyTorch build, denial of service or memory corruption may follow. This is a conditional impact statement, not a reproduced outcome. Reliable RCE is not claimed.

The opt-in feature, scheduling requirement, and absence of a measured live win rate support Medium/P2 despite the serious historical sink class. No additional deployment assumptions are required for the one-request scheduler beyond stock default-executor concurrency being available.

The affected vLLM revision uses a process-global PyTorch context as the follow-up protection for CVE-2025-62164. A later chat feature causes two prompt-embedding parts from one request to run concurrently on the default executor. One context can restore the flag to False while the other is still guarded, allowing the historical malformed sparse payload class to reach the historical to_dense() sink. The new issue is the concurrent guard bypass and shipped trigger, not the payload or sink. Runtime validation proves the bypass and safe sink reachability on PyTorch 2.11.0; historical crash and memory-corruption effects remain conditional, and RCE was not tested or claimed.

Impact

Multiple concurrent operations access a shared resource without proper synchronization, producing unpredictable results depending on timing. Typical impact: TOCTOU exploits, data corruption, or privilege escalation.

Affected versions

vllm (>= 0.21.0, < 0.26.0)

Security releases

vllm → 0.26.0 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

The immediate fix is one shared process-wide lock around every use of this process-global sparse guard. The lock must cover invariant enabling, deserialization, tensor type validation, and dense conversion:

with shared_sparse_load_lock:
    with torch.sparse.check_sparse_tensor_invariants():
        tensor = torch.load(..., weights_only=True, map_location="cpu")
        validate_tensor_type(tensor)
        tensor = tensor.to_dense()

Every prompt, image, and audio loader that manipulates the same global flag must use the same lock. A lock only around torch.load, separate per-loader locks, or a lock omitted from the chat helper would leave overlapping save/restore sequences possible.

The stronger design is to avoid mutable process-global validation state in concurrent request code. Prefer a PyTorch per-call invariant check if one is available, or reconstruct and validate serialized embeddings inside a deliberately serialized boundary before any sparse operation.

Regression coverage should:

  • Preserve the actual-target negative control using the identical malformed payload.
  • Force A-enter, B-enter, A-exit, B-load and assert B remains protected.
  • Execute the multi-part chat tracker with the event loop's default executor and renderer_num_workers=1.
  • Cover cross-loader overlap so later prompt, image, or audio changes cannot bypass a shared fix.
  • Assert the global flag is restored after success and exceptions.
  • Reject invalid tensors before any dense conversion.

Until a fix is deployed, leaving enable_prompt_embeds disabled removes this stock source path.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-73557? CVE-2026-73557 is a medium-severity race condition vulnerability in vllm (pip), affecting versions >= 0.21.0, < 0.26.0. It is fixed in 0.26.0. Multiple concurrent operations access a shared resource without proper synchronization, producing unpredictable results depending on timing.
  2. Which versions of vllm are affected by CVE-2026-73557? vllm (pip) versions >= 0.21.0, < 0.26.0 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-73557? Yes. CVE-2026-73557 is fixed in 0.26.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is CVE-2026-73557 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-73557 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-73557 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix CVE-2026-73557? Upgrade vllm to 0.26.0 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in vllm

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.