Summary
Grav: Blueprint dynamic-data bare-function branch is denylist-gated and omits error_log, giving arbitrary file write
Affected versions and vulnerable location
- Confirmed on grav core at
78ebfc1(tag 2.0.13). - Sinks:
system/src/Grav/Common/Data/Blueprint.php:455-458call_user_func_array($o, $params)(bare-function dynamic-data provider).- Twin:
system/src/Grav/Framework/Flex/FlexDirectory.php:936-938call_user_func_array($function, $params).
- Validation gate:
Blueprint::isSafeDynamicCall()atBlueprint.php:514-536.Class::methodbranch (:514-527) uses a strict positive allowlistself::$allowedDynamicCallables.- Bare-function branch (
:530-534) uses only a denylist:if (is_string($function) && Utils::isDangerousFunction($function)) return false; return !self::paramsContainDangerousCallable($params);.
- Denylist:
Utils::isDangerousFunction()(system/src/Grav/Common/Utils.php, list around:2020-2270).
Root cause
GHSA-7pgq/CVE-2026-64850 hardened the Class::method half of the dynamic-callable validation to a positive allowlist because a page-edit account could otherwise name any static method as a provider and reach file/secret gadgets. The bare-function half was left on a denylist (isDangerousFunction). Any bare PHP function not on that list executes.
error_log is not on the denylist (verified: no occurrence in Utils.php). error_log($message, 3, $destination) appends attacker-controlled $message to attacker-controlled file $destination, an arbitrary-file-append primitive. paramsContainDangerousCallable() (:587-603) only scans params for dangerous callable strings, so a PHP payload string and a destination path both pass. (stream_socket_client, dl, and mb_send_mail are likewise absent, giving SSRF/other primitives.)
Attacker model
The same surface the published dynamic-data advisories accept as reachable: a data-*@ directive in a form blueprint the Form plugin assembles from page frontmatter (GHSA-fj2p), or a data@ field in a Flex directory/pages/users blueprint (GHSA-c4wf). A page-edit / blueprint-config account, no shell.
Reachability trace
- Author a blueprint field with a bare-function data directive, e.g.
data-options@: ['error_log', '<?php system($_GET[0]); ?>', 3, 'user/data/x.php']. Blueprint::init()resolves the directive;isSafeDynamicCall('error_log', $params)reaches the bare-function branch (:530),isDangerousFunction('error_log')is false,paramsContainDangerousCallable([...])is false (no callable strings), so it returns true.call_user_func_array('error_log', ['<?php ...', 3, 'user/data/x.php'])(:455) appends the PHP payload touser/data/x.php.- Writing to a web-served path (or any path later included) yields code execution. The upload extension denylist does not apply, this is a direct
error_logwrite, not an upload.
Reproduction
Executed end to end against the real Grav\Common\Data\Blueprint class loaded via composer install autoload (PHP 8.5.8, core clone at HEAD 78ebfc1). A harness called the real public Blueprint::isSafeDynamicCall(), then drove the sink and executed the written file:
[1] isSafeDynamicCall('error_log', [payload,3,dest]) => true # guard ACCEPTS error_log (bug)
[2] isSafeDynamicCall('system', ['id']) => false # control
isSafeDynamicCall('exec', ['id']) => false # control
[3] call_user_func_array('error_log', ['<?php echo "PWNED"; ?>'.EOL, 3, '/tmp/grav_rce_proof.php'])
file written: /tmp/grav_rce_proof.php (23 bytes) = <?php echo "PWNED"; ?>
[4] php /tmp/grav_rce_proof.php => PWNED # arbitrary PHP executed (RCE)
The guard returns true for error_log (and false for the denylisted system/exec controls), the error_log sink wrote attacker PHP to disk, and executing that file yielded PWNED. Source confirmation:
rg -n "error_log|stream_socket_client|mb_send_mail" system/src/Grav/Common/Utils.php # no hits
rg -n "isDangerousFunction|allowedDynamicCallables|call_user_func_array" system/src/Grav/Common/Data/Blueprint.php
error_log absent from Utils.php; Blueprint.php gates the bare-function branch on isDangerousFunction only, while the Class::method branch uses the positive allowlist.
Severity and CVSS reasoning
Suggested severity: High (same class and reach as GHSA-fj2p / CVE-2026-64850).
Suggested CVSS:3.1 vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H (9.6) for the RCE outcome; the maintainer may prefer the exact rating they gave GHSA-fj2p.
PR:L: a blueprint/page-edit account, not super.C:H/I:H/A:H: arbitrary file write leading to code execution.
How I found it and a note on tooling
I compared the two branches of isSafeDynamicCall(): the Class::method branch is a positive allowlist (the GHSA-7pgq fix) while the bare-function branch is a denylist, then checked the denylist for append/exec-capable functions and found error_log missing. I used AI assistance for enumeration and drafting. I then executed the real Blueprint::isSafeDynamicCall() (loaded via composer autoload) to confirm it accepts error_log and rejects system/exec, and drove the error_log sink to write and execute attacker PHP. Verification is executed end to end against the real class; I did not run it through a full HTTP request into a bootstrapped Grav site.
Impact
Untrusted input is evaluated as executable code within the application's runtime environment. Typical impact: arbitrary code execution within the application's privilege context.
CVE-2026-75827 has a CVSS score of 8.8 (Critical). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.0.15); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Convert the bare-function branch to a positive allowlist, symmetric with the Class::method allowlist at :523 (only the option-provider functions first-party blueprints actually use). A denylist cannot be complete: error_log (arbitrary append), stream_socket_client (SSRF), and others must otherwise each be enumerated.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-75827? CVE-2026-75827 is a critical-severity code injection vulnerability in getgrav/grav (composer), affecting versions <= 2.0.14. It is fixed in 2.0.15. Untrusted input is evaluated as executable code within the application's runtime environment.
- How severe is CVE-2026-75827? CVE-2026-75827 has a CVSS score of 8.8 (Critical). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of getgrav/grav are affected by CVE-2026-75827? getgrav/grav (composer) versions <= 2.0.14 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-75827? Yes. CVE-2026-75827 is fixed in 2.0.15. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-75827 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-75827 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-75827 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-75827? Upgrade
getgrav/gravto 2.0.15 or later.