CVE-2026-75837

CVE-2026-75837 is a high-severity improper privilege management vulnerability in getgrav/grav (composer), affecting versions < 2.0.14. It is fixed in 2.0.14.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Grav: Missing admin.super guard on core group blueprint access field allows admin.users operator to escalate to super-admin

The core Flex group blueprint system/blueprints/user/group.yaml (access field, lines 48-55) omits the security@: admin.super field guard that its sibling account blueprint carries (account.yaml:131/138/150, added by the CVE-2026-42613 fix). A delegated non-super operator holding admin.users.update can therefore save a group whose access map contains admin.super: true, which UserGroupObject::authorize then grants to every member of that group, a full privilege escalation to super-admin (scheduler/cron RCE, Twig eval). This is a distinct file, sink, and fix from all four related advisories.

Root Cause

The CVE-2026-42613 fix protected the account access/groups fields with a blueprint-level security@: admin.super gate, which Blueprint::dynamicSecurity() (system/src/Grav/Common/Data/Blueprint.php:644-662) uses to mark a field validate.ignore=true for non-super users so BlueprintSchema::filterArray() (BlueprintSchema.php:263-311) drops it. The functionally-identical group access field, a permission map granted to every member of the group, is declared in system/blueprints/user/group.yaml:48-55 with check_authorize: false and NO security@ guard. check_authorize has ZERO PHP enforcement (grep -rn check_authorize across the repo returns 0 PHP consumers; only two YAML blueprints reference it), so security@ is the sole real control. Because the group access field lacks security@, dynamicSecurity never flags it, filterArray retains it, and Validation::filterArray (type: array, value_type: bool) passes the nested admin.super:true leaf through. The core save path (FlexObject::update() then Framework/Flex/FlexObject.php:683 $blueprint->filter($data,true,true) then save()) persists it to user://config/groups.yaml.

Proof of Concept

As a non-super admin.users operator who is a member of group ops:

POST /admin/accounts/groups/ops   (or groups.json task:save)
data[access][admin][super]=1

user/config/groups.yaml gains ops: { access: { admin: { super: true } } }, so the operator is super-admin on the next request.

Attack Chain

  1. Entry: authenticated delegated admin (admin.users.update, no admin.super) POSTs the group-edit form for a group they belong to (or a new group), body access[admin][super]=true. Guard: FlexAuthorizeTrait::isAuthorizedAction to admin.users.update. Bypass proof: user-groups.yaml exposes groups at admin.users:crudl; operator legitimately holds update.
  2. Check (field guard): Blueprint::dynamicSecurity marks validate.ignore only for security@ fields. Guard: none on group access (no security@). Bypass proof: group.yaml:48-55 has no security@; git log -S 'security@' -- system/blueprints/user/group.yaml is empty.
  3. Filter: BlueprintSchema::filterArray retains the non-ignored field; Validation::filterArray (value_type: bool) passes admin.super:true through. Bypass proof: field not flagged ignore/disabled; nested bool leaf preserved.
  4. Sink (persist): FlexObject::update then filter then save writes to user://config/groups.yaml. Guard: none. Bypass proof: value already survived steps 2/3; storage performs no ACL filtering.
  5. Impact: any member request triggers UserGroupObject::authorize('admin.super') (.../UserGroups/UserGroupObject.php:75) returning true, so the member is super-admin, enabling scheduler/Twig RCE.

Bypass Evidence

  • system/blueprints/user/group.yaml:48-55: access block with check_authorize: false, no security@ (confirmed live on tag 2.0.12).
  • git log -S 'security@' -- system/blueprints/user/group.yaml is empty (guard never existed; a permanent gap, not a regression).
  • git log 2.0.12..HEAD -- system/blueprints/user/group.yaml is empty (no post-release fix).
  • grep -rn check_authorize (whole repo) returns 0 PHP hits (guard unenforced in PHP).
  • grep -rn "typePermissions|filterPermissions" system/src/Grav/Common/Data returns 0 (permissions map falls through to array-bool filtering that keeps nested keys).
  • Guard asymmetry: account.yaml:131/138/150 carry security@: admin.super; group.yaml carries none. GHSA-h33v-82r9-v8pm's own text confirms the blueprint security@ gate is the sole Flex-backend strip for these keys.

Affected Versions

<= 2.0.12 (latest release; the guard never existed on group.yaml, so all 2.x are affected). The missing guard and the strip logic are both in core getgrav/grav; the group-edit UI is provided by the flex-objects/admin plugin, but the fix belongs in core.

Impact

A delegated admin.users operator (strictly below admin.super) escalates to super-admin, gaining the admin panel, the scheduler (cron to RCE) and Twig evaluation. Full read/write/DoS (C:H/I:H/A:H). Even absent self-escalation, arbitrary rewrite of ANY group's ACL is itself a full escalation primitive.

The application assigns, modifies, tracks, or checks privileges incorrectly, allowing a user to gain elevated access. Typical impact: privilege escalation beyond the intended level.

CVE-2026-75837 has a CVSS score of 9.1 (High). The vector is network-reachable, high privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.0.14); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

getgrav/grav (< 2.0.14)

Security releases

getgrav/grav → 2.0.14 (composer)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Add security@: admin.super to the access field in system/blueprints/user/group.yaml (mirroring account.yaml), and/or enforce a super-only strip on group ACL saves in core so all callers are covered.

Reported by zx (Jace), GitHub: @manus-use

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-75837? CVE-2026-75837 is a high-severity improper privilege management vulnerability in getgrav/grav (composer), affecting versions < 2.0.14. It is fixed in 2.0.14. The application assigns, modifies, tracks, or checks privileges incorrectly, allowing a user to gain elevated access.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-75837? CVE-2026-75837 has a CVSS score of 9.1 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of getgrav/grav are affected by CVE-2026-75837? getgrav/grav (composer) versions < 2.0.14 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-75837? Yes. CVE-2026-75837 is fixed in 2.0.14. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-75837 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-75837 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-75837 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-75837? Upgrade getgrav/grav to 2.0.14 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in getgrav/grav

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.