Summary
rclone: Directory metadata (chmod/chown/chtimes) applied through a planted symlink in rclone local --links escapes the destination
With -l/--links, rclone's local backend recreates a source .rclonelink object as a real symlink at the destination verbatim (preserved by design for faithful backups). Directory-metadata application, however, does not go through the os.Root sandbox and does not use NOFOLLOW syscalls. A local Directory always has translatedLink=false, so when the destination path already exists as a planted symlink, rclone applies chmod/chown/chtimes through that symlink to a target outside the destination tree. An attacker who controls the source contents (malicious/compromised remote, shared bucket) obtains attacker-valued chmod/chown/chtimes of an arbitrary path outside the backup destination.
Root Cause
MkdirMetadata(backend/local/local.go:895) callsf.lstat(=os.Lstat, local.go:465) on the destination path. On a pre-planted symlink,os.Lstatsucceeds, so theerrors.Is(err, os.ErrNotExist)branch (local.go:896) that would create a real directory via theos.Root-guardedf.Mkdiris not taken. Instead aDirectoryis built directly on the symlink path.writeMetadataToFileruns rawos.Chown(backend/local/metadata.go:131) andos.Chmod(metadata.go:158);setTimesruns rawos.Chtimes(backend/local/local.go:1318).- The CVE-2024-52522 NOFOLLOW fix (
os.Lchown/lChmod/lChtimes) is gated onif o.translatedLink(metadata.go:128/150, local.go:1315). ADirectory(newDirectory→newObjectwith no.rclonelinksuffix) is nevertranslatedLink, so it always takes the raw following branch. The CVE-2026-54572os.Rootfix covers only content writes, not metadata syscalls.
Proof of Concept
mkdir -p /src /dest
# run 1: source object pwn.rclonelink whose body = /home/victim/secret.d
printf '/home/victim/secret.d' > /src/pwn.rclonelink
rclone sync --links /src /dest # plants /dest/pwn -> /home/victim/secret.d
# attacker swaps source pwn to a real directory with chosen metadata:
rm /src/pwn.rclonelink ; mkdir -p /src/pwn/keep ; chmod 777 /src/pwn
rclone sync --links --metadata /src /dest # MkdirMetadata sees /dest/pwn exists (symlink) ->
# chmod 0777 applied THROUGH it to /home/victim/secret.d
ls -ld /home/victim/secret.d # => drwxrwxrwx (outside dir, attacker-chosen mode)
A single-run PoC is achievable against directory-based object sources (drive/onedrive-class) that satisfy both ReadDirMetadata and CanHaveEmptyDirectories and can present pwn.rclonelink and pwn/ simultaneously. Local→local uses the two-run backup model (same repeated-backup model as CVE-2024-52522 and CVE-2026-54572). Verified end-to-end against the real fs/sync.Sync engine on HEAD: the two-run backup backdated the outside target's mtime and chmod'd it 0777 while os.Root correctly blocked the content-copy of pwn/keep, isolating the metadata gap.
Attack Chain
- Entry. Victim runs
rclone copy/sync --links [--metadata] <untrusted-remote>: /dest. Attacker controls source contents.- Guard: none,
--linkscopying an untrusted remote is a documented, supported operation.
- Guard: none,
- Plant symlink. Source serves
pwn.rclonelinkwith body = absolute outside path; rclone recreatesdst/pwn→ outside.- Guard:
Fs.symlinkroutes creation throughos.Root.Symlink(local.go:~1552). - Bypass proof:
os.Rootcreates the link verbatim by design (commit 1154afe); the upstreamos.Rootfix's testTestSymlinkEscapeWriteThroughBlockedconfirms only write-through is refused, the link is planted.
- Guard:
- Deferred dir-metadata fires after transfers. Source presents non-empty dir
pwn;setDelayedDirModTimes(sync.go:1002) runs strictly afterstopTransfers()(sync.go:988), after the symlink is planted.- Guard:
MkdirMetadatawould create a real dir via os.Root-guardedf.Mkdir(local.go:897) inside itserrors.Is(err, os.ErrNotExist)branch. - Bypass proof:
os.Lstat(local.go:465) on the existing symlink returns success, so theErrNotExistbranch (local.go:896) is NOT taken;f.Mkdir/os.Root never runs. Empiricallyos.IsNotExist(err)=falsefor the planted symlink.
- Guard:
- Sink follows the symlink.
CopyDirMetadata→MkdirMetadata→writeMetadataToFilerunsos.Chown/os.Chmod(metadata.go:131/158);DirSetModTime→setTimesrunsos.Chtimes(local.go:1318), all ono.path="dst/pwn"withtranslatedLink=false.- Guard: CVE-2024-52522 NOFOLLOW branch (
os.Lchown/lChmod/lChtimes). - Bypass proof: that branch is gated on
if o.translatedLink(metadata.go:128/150, local.go:1315); aDirectoryalways hastranslatedLink=false, so the raw following branch runs. POSIX-confirmed:chmod 777/touchon a symlink path change the target's mode/mtime.
- Guard: CVE-2024-52522 NOFOLLOW branch (
- Impact.
chmod/chown/chtimeson an attacker-chosen path outside the destination, with attacker-controlled values.
Bypass Evidence
if o.translatedLinkgates verified verbatim on v1.75.0 at metadata.go:128/150 and local.go:1315;os.Chown/os.Chmod/os.Chtimeson the else branch at metadata.go:131/158 and local.go:1318.newDirectory→newObject(local.go:581/589/596) never sets the.rclonelinksuffix →translatedLink=falsefor all directories.MkdirMetadataskip branch:os.Lstatsucceeds on planted symlink →errors.Is(err, os.ErrNotExist)false at local.go:896 → guardedf.Mkdirskipped.- Real
fs/sync.SyncE2E on HEAD:TestDirMetadataThroughPlantedSymlink(outside dir → 0777),TestDirSetModTimeThroughPlantedSymlink(mtime set, default-on),TestE2E_TwoRunBackup(backdated outside target while content-copy blocked by os.Root). All PASS. ControlTestControl_ContentWriteBlockedconfirms harness fidelity.
Affected Versions
<= 1.75.0. Vulnerable code present on latest release tag v1.75.0 and HEAD (5629f26); git log v1.75.0..HEAD -- backend/local/metadata.go backend/local/local.go is empty (no post-release fix).
Impact
Attacker-controlled chmod/chown/chtimes (values taken from the source directory's mode/uid/gid/mtime) applied to any file or directory outside the destination. chtimes (mtime) escape works with just --links and default flags; chmod/chown escape additionally needs --metadata. When rclone runs as root with --metadata and a source uid=0, the chown primitive reaches the CVE-2024-52522 privilege-escalation ceiling (take ownership of an out-of-tree path).
CVE-2026-88016 has a CVSS score of 6.5 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.75.1); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Route directory metadata through os.Root when TranslateSymlinks is set (use fchmodat(AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW)/Lchown/UtimesNanoAt(AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) on the rel path within the root), and/or extend MkdirMetadata to detect that the pre-existing destination path is a symlink and refuse to apply following-metadata, mirroring the CVE-2024-52522 NOFOLLOW branch that currently exists only for translatedLink objects.
Reported by zx (Jace), GitHub: @manus-use
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-88016? CVE-2026-88016 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in github.com/rclone/rclone (go), affecting versions <= 1.75.0. It is fixed in 1.75.1.
- How severe is CVE-2026-88016? CVE-2026-88016 has a CVSS score of 6.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of github.com/rclone/rclone are affected by CVE-2026-88016? github.com/rclone/rclone (go) versions <= 1.75.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-88016? Yes. CVE-2026-88016 is fixed in 1.75.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-88016 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-88016 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-88016 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-88016? Upgrade
github.com/rclone/rcloneto 1.75.1 or later.