CVE-2026-88046

CVE-2026-88046 is a medium-severity path traversal vulnerability in github.com/rclone/rclone (go), affecting versions < 1.75.1. It is fixed in 1.75.1.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

rclone: source object names can escape the configured root on upload

Multiple backends, when given a specially crafted object to copy, can escape the backend confinement.

Backend Keep/Close Per-backend severity
sftp Medium Real filesystem escape, fires under default encoding.
smb Low-Medium Escapes to a different SMB share the credential can reach.
ftp Low Real, leading-.. overshoot PoC is partly neutralized by encoding; escape bounded to at/below the login base.
webdav Low Server-side ACLs are the real boundary.
b2 Low Same-account sibling bucket crossing on a flat keyspace.
swift Low Same, container.
qingstor Low Same.
oracleobjectstorage Low Same.
internetarchive Low IA items are owner-writable only; confined to user's own items.
storj Low Can retarget a different bucket in the same access grant.
filelu Low Confined to the user's own account.
shade Low Confined to the user's own drive.
sia Low siad API password already grants full-daemon access.

Root cause

rclone core does not sanitize .. in a source object's Remote() - verified: nothing in fs/march, fs/sync, fs/list, or fs/operations rejects .. segments before the name reaches the destination backend's Put/Update/Mkdir. Confinement is therefore each backend's responsibility, and these backends join root + remote without a check.

This divides into two classes:

  • Bucket based backends - bucket.Split(path.Join(f.root, rootRelativePath)):

    • backend/b2/b2.go:404, backend/swift/swift.go:464, backend/qingstor/qingstor.go:198, backend/oracleobjectstorage/oracleobjectstorage.go:245, backend/internetarchive/internetarchive.go:1016, backend/smb/smb.go:885, backend/storj/fs.go:289.
    • path.Join collapses .. on the standard (ASCII) form before encoding is applied (e.g. FromStandardPath(path.Join(...)) at backend/b2/b2.go:1641), so EncodeDot never gets the chance to neutralize the ...
    • lib/bucket.Join does not clean paths (keeps .. as a literal key segment); path.Join does. backend/s3, backend/azureblob, backend/googlecloudstorage already use bucket.Join and are therefore not affected.
  • Path based backends - path.Join(root, remote) onto a real path:

    • sftp: remotePath = path.Join(f.absRoot, f.opt.Enc.FromStandardPath(remote)) (backend/sftp/sftp.go:2497). Default encoding is encoder.Display (== Standard), and FromStandardPath short-circuits to a pass-through in that mode, so .. survives; f.absRoot is absolute, so path.Join("/home/user/root", "../../../../etc/passwd") -> /etc/passwd.
    • webdav: filePath at backend/webdav/webdav.go:426-432.
    • ftp: path.Join(f.root, remote) at ~14 sites (e.g. backend/ftp/ftp.go:1247).
    • filelu, shade, sia: analogous joins.

Precondition that limits reachability

For any of these to fire, a source must hand rclone a Remote() containing raw ... That is only possible when:

  1. the source is a flat-keyspace object store (not a filesystem - a local/sftp/smb source cannot represent ../../x as one directory entry), and
  2. the offending key was written with native, non-rclone tooling - rclone's own writer applies EncodeDot and rewrites a .. segment to fullwidth .., so you cannot create such a key through rclone.

rclone's source-side listing does pass a natively-planted raw .. key through unchanged (verified for b2: remote := file.Name[len(prefix):] after ToStandardPath, backend/b2/b2.go:858,867). The reports never establish this precondition; it is the same omission across every member of the class.

Example attack

# Step 1 - attacker, using NATIVE S3 tooling (NOT rclone) on a source the victim ingests from:
aws s3api put-object --bucket shared-drop --key '../../victim-backups/pwned.txt' --body evil.txt

# Step 2 - victim's ordinary ingest:
rclone copy s3-drop:shared-drop b2:victim-uploads/incoming
# path.Join("victim-uploads/incoming", "../../victim-backups/pwned.txt") = "victim-backups/pwned.txt"
# -> lands in the victim's victim-backups bucket instead of under incoming/

The blast radius is the victim's own account (a bucket/share/path the configured credential already reaches) - integrity misdirection, not a cross-tenant or confidentiality breach. sftp/smb are the exception in reach (server filesystem / other share), still bounded by the login's own permissions.

Precedent

This is the same class as the already-fixed local backend advisory https://github.com/rclone/rclone/security/advisories/GHSA-7p4m-qxvv-g567, which added (*Fs).localPath returning errPathEscapes for names resolving outside the root (backend/local/local.go:819-826). That fix was justified because the destination was the operator's own OS filesystem; the same reasoning extends (at lower severity) to sftp/smb.

Impact

Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files. Typical impact: unauthorized file read or write outside the intended directory.

CVE-2026-88046 has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.75.1); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

github.com/rclone/rclone (< 1.75.1)

Security releases

github.com/rclone/rclone → 1.75.1 (go)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade github.com/rclone/rclone to 1.75.1 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-88046? CVE-2026-88046 is a medium-severity path traversal vulnerability in github.com/rclone/rclone (go), affecting versions < 1.75.1. It is fixed in 1.75.1. Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-88046? CVE-2026-88046 has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of github.com/rclone/rclone are affected by CVE-2026-88046? github.com/rclone/rclone (go) versions < 1.75.1 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-88046? Yes. CVE-2026-88046 is fixed in 1.75.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-88046 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-88046 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-88046 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-88046? Upgrade github.com/rclone/rclone to 1.75.1 or later.

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.