Summary
vm2: Default VM can mutate host TypedArray and ArrayBuffer intrinsics after the host-prototype pollution fix
vm2's current host-intrinsic prototype protection is incomplete. The fix for GHSA-vwrp-x96c-mhwq blocks sandbox writes into classic host intrinsics such as Object.prototype, Array.prototype, and Function.prototype, but current head still lets sandbox code in a default VM reach and mutate host Uint8Array.prototype, %TypedArray%.prototype, and ArrayBuffer.prototype.
After VM.run() returns, normal host typed-array and ArrayBuffer objects observe attacker-controlled properties and methods installed by the sandbox.
Technical Details
The existing mitigation relies on protectedHostObjects in lib/bridge.js. That set is populated from otherGlobalPrototypes, which is built from a fixed inventory of classic globals:
const globalsList = [
'Number', 'String', 'Boolean', 'Date', 'RegExp', 'Map', 'WeakMap',
'Set', 'WeakSet', 'Promise', 'Function'
];
The inventory omits typed-array and ArrayBuffer intrinsics. Sandbox code can still reuse the host-prototype walking primitive from the prior public advisory:
const lookupGetter = ({}).__lookupGetter__;
const apply = Buffer.apply;
const protoGetter = apply.apply(lookupGetter, [Buffer, ['__proto__']]);
const hostBuffer = Buffer.from([1]);
const hostBufferPrototype = protoGetter.call(hostBuffer);
const hostUint8ArrayPrototype = protoGetter.call(hostBufferPrototype);
const hostTypedArrayPrototype = protoGetter.call(hostUint8ArrayPrototype);
const hostArrayBufferPrototype = protoGetter.call(hostBuffer.buffer);
Those objects are not sandbox-local. Inside the sandbox, hostUint8ArrayPrototype === Uint8Array.prototype, hostTypedArrayPrototype === Object.getPrototypeOf(Uint8Array.prototype), and hostArrayBufferPrototype === ArrayBuffer.prototype are all false. Because the objects are not in protectedHostObjects, bridge defineProperty writes are forwarded into the real host objects.
This is the same guard-coverage boundary as the previous host-intrinsic prototype pollution fix, but with a missing intrinsic family. The bridge already has the correct enforcement shape; the protected inventory is too narrow.
PoC
PoV: poc/pov-host-typedarray-arraybuffer-prototype-pollution.js
Current-head output:
{
"status": "completed",
"vulnerable": true,
"node": "v25.8.0",
"v8": "14.1.146.11-node.20",
"control": {
"defineResult": true,
"sandboxReadsBack": "sandbox-only",
"hostControlAfter": null
},
"exploit": {
"hostUint8IsSandboxUint8": false,
"hostTypedArrayIsSandboxTypedArray": false,
"hostArrayBufferIsSandboxArrayBuffer": false,
"defineUint8": true,
"defineTypedArray": true,
"defineArrayBuffer": true,
"defineMethod": true
},
"hostEffect": {
"uint8Marker": "polluted-host-uint8array-prototype",
"typedArrayMarker": "polluted-host-typedarray-prototype",
"arrayBufferMarker": "polluted-host-arraybuffer-prototype",
"methodReturn": "sandbox-method-reached-host-uint8array"
}
}
The control proves sandbox-local Uint8Array.prototype writes remain sandbox-local. The exploit path reaches host prototypes through the bridge and causes host-created objects to observe sandbox-installed properties after VM.run() returns.
Affected Package/Versions
Confirmed on current head 7a1f5100b96f48d34e0fe104ab37c0acc5944f92 / v3.11.5 with Node v25.8.0 / V8 14.1.146.11-node.20.
Confirmed affected after the prior patch: npm:vm2 >= 3.11.0, <= 3.11.5.
Local sweep also reproduces on v3.10.0 through v3.10.5, but that range overlaps the already-published GHSA-vwrp-x96c-mhwq range. v3.9.0 through v3.9.2 did not produce host-visible pollution in the same local test.
Why This Is Not Intended Behavior
vm2 documents VM as a sandbox for untrusted code without require, with only JavaScript built-ins and Node's Buffer available by default. The known escape hatches do not explain this issue:
require.builtin: ['*']is aNodeVMconfiguration; this PoV uses defaultVM.nesting: trueis not enabled or used.- The README timeout caveat covers host code operating on objects returned from the sandbox; this PoV mutates host intrinsics and later affects ordinary host-created typed arrays and ArrayBuffers.
The project's own attack notes state that host-realm intrinsic prototypes should be protected from sandbox writes, while non-intrinsic host objects may remain mutable when intentionally exposed. Typed-array and ArrayBuffer prototypes are host intrinsics, not embedder-owned application objects.
Buffer availability explains how the PoV reaches the host prototype chain, but it does not authorize mutation of unrelated host-realm intrinsics. The host effects are observed on new host-created typed arrays and ArrayBuffers after VM.run() returns; the host is not invoking an object returned from the sandbox.
Impact
This is a sandbox boundary violation and host intrinsic prototype pollution. An attacker who can run JavaScript in a default vm2 VM can mutate shared host typed-array and ArrayBuffer behavior without NodeVM, require, wildcard builtins, nesting: true, or any host-provided typed-array object.
The supplied PoV demonstrates integrity and availability impact by installing markers and a method on host prototypes:
Uint8Array.prototype%TypedArray%.prototype, which affects typed-array families through the shared typed-array prototype chainArrayBuffer.prototype
The PoV does not claim direct host command execution or direct confidentiality impact. It is local-only and restores touched descriptors before exit.
CVE-2026-92953 has a CVSS score of 10.0 (Critical). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (3.11.8); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Extend the protected host-object inventory and identity/prototype mappings to typed-array and binary-data intrinsics, including at least:
%TypedArray%.prototypeArrayBuffer.prototypeSharedArrayBuffer.prototypewhen presentDataView.prototype- all concrete typed-array prototypes present in the runtime, including
Uint8Array.prototype,Uint8ClampedArray.prototype,Int8Array.prototype,Uint16Array.prototype,Int16Array.prototype,Uint32Array.prototype,Int32Array.prototype,Float16Array.prototypewhen present,Float32Array.prototype,Float64Array.prototype,BigInt64Array.prototype, andBigUint64Array.prototype
A temporary patched-control that added this intrinsic family to thisGlobalPrototypes caused the same PoV's Reflect.defineProperty() calls to throw VMError: Operation not allowed on contextified object, and no host markers were installed.
The fix should cover the same host mutation traps used by the existing host-intrinsic protection: set, defineProperty, deleteProperty, and preventExtensions. It should not special-case Buffer; Buffer is only one way to reach the omitted host prototypes.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-92953? CVE-2026-92953 is a critical-severity security vulnerability in vm2 (npm), affecting versions >= 3.11.0, <= 3.11.7. It is fixed in 3.11.8.
- How severe is CVE-2026-92953? CVE-2026-92953 has a CVSS score of 10.0 (Critical). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of vm2 are affected by CVE-2026-92953? vm2 (npm) versions >= 3.11.0, <= 3.11.7 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-92953? Yes. CVE-2026-92953 is fixed in 3.11.8. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-92953 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-92953 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-92953 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-92953? Upgrade
vm2to 3.11.8 or later.