GHSA-4WWP-F6GW-6QM5

GHSA-4WWP-F6GW-6QM5 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel (go), affecting versions < 0.0.0-20260819144130-256d73aa7f94. It is fixed in 0.0.0-20260819144130-256d73aa7f94.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

SiYuan: TLS Private Keys Readable via getFile (Incomplete Blocklist)

IsForbiddenAbsPath() only blocks conf/conf.json by exact match. The TLS private key (conf/key.pem) and CA private key (conf/ca.key) live in the same conf/ directory and are absent from the blocklist. Any authenticated user can retrieve them via POST /api/file/getFile.

Root cause

kernel/util/path_guard.go, IsForbiddenAbsPath() has no entry for TLS key material. The getFile handler at kernel/api/file.go:497 skips the blocklist for RoleAdministrator, and in v3.8.1 all authenticated users receive RoleAdministrator (no non-admin role is currently issued to direct API consumers). The files are generated on every boot regardless of whether TLS is active.

Steps to reproduce:

# No token required on a default no-auth-code instance
curl -s -X POST http://TARGET:6806/api/file/getFile \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"path": "/conf/key.pem"}'
curl -s -X POST http://TARGET:6806/api/file/getFile \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"path": "/conf/ca.key"}'

Response: Raw PEM private key bytes.

Prior art:

This is the same class of bug as GHSA-9jfx-rc58-h23j (conf.json readable via template render) and GHSA-c8r8-95hg-mp34 (MCP file tool blocklist incomplete). The fix is to add conf/key.pem, conf/ca.key, conf/cert.pem, and conf/ca.crt to IsForbiddenAbsPath().

Impact

On deployments with TLS enabled (--ssl flag or NetworkServeTLS), possession of key.pem allows decryption of captured HTTPS traffic. Possession of ca.key allows signing certificates trusted by any client that imported SiYuan's locaprompts users to do). The files exist on every installation even whenTLS is currently inactive.

Affected versions

github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel (< 0.0.0-20260819144130-256d73aa7f94)

Security releases

github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel → 0.0.0-20260819144130-256d73aa7f94 (go)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to 0.0.0-20260819144130-256d73aa7f94 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is GHSA-4WWP-F6GW-6QM5? GHSA-4WWP-F6GW-6QM5 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel (go), affecting versions < 0.0.0-20260819144130-256d73aa7f94. It is fixed in 0.0.0-20260819144130-256d73aa7f94.
  2. Which versions of github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel are affected by GHSA-4WWP-F6GW-6QM5? github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel (go) versions < 0.0.0-20260819144130-256d73aa7f94 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for GHSA-4WWP-F6GW-6QM5? Yes. GHSA-4WWP-F6GW-6QM5 is fixed in 0.0.0-20260819144130-256d73aa7f94. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is GHSA-4WWP-F6GW-6QM5 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-4WWP-F6GW-6QM5 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether GHSA-4WWP-F6GW-6QM5 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix GHSA-4WWP-F6GW-6QM5? Upgrade github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel to 0.0.0-20260819144130-256d73aa7f94 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.