Summary
AsyncSSH: asyncio event-loop freeze via SSH maximum packet size = 0 in SSHMSGCHANNELOPEN / OPENCONFIRMATION
A malicious SSH server can wedge an AsyncSSH client, and an authenticated
client can wedge an AsyncSSH server, by sending a channel maximum packet size of 0 in SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_OPEN_CONFIRMATION (server→client) orSSH_MSG_CHANNEL_OPEN (client→server). AsyncSSH stores the peer-supplied value
verbatim with no lower-bound check; the first time channel data is written,SSHChannel._flush_send_buf enters a synchronous infinite loop that cannot
be interrupted by asyncio.wait_for or any timeout. The loop body has noawait, so it blocks the entire asyncio event loop, for a server, one
malicious authenticated channel freezes all current and future connections.
RFC 4254 §5.1 leaves receiver behavior for a peer-reported "maximum packet
size = 0" undefined, so the value must be rejected rather than stored.
Root cause
asyncssh/channel.py:
# process_open (server side) -- line 465
self._send_pktsize = send_pktsize # peer value, no >= 1 check
# process_open_confirmation (client) -- line 528
self._send_pktsize = send_pktsize # peer value, no >= 1 check
# _flush_send_buf -- lines 305-320
while self._send_buf and self._send_window:
pktsize = min(self._send_window, self._send_pktsize) # 0 when peer sends 0
buf, datatype = self._send_buf[0]
if len(buf) > pktsize: # True for any buffered data
data = buf[:pktsize] # empty (b'')
del buf[:pktsize] # no-op
...
self._send_window -= len(data) # -= 0, unchanged
With _send_pktsize == 0, pktsize is 0, so buf[:0] is empty,del buf[:0] is a no-op, and _send_window is never decremented, thewhile condition is permanently true, and with no await in the body the
event loop is blocked.
Affected versions
<= 2.23.1 (latest release, 2026-06-06); also present on master
(channel.py:465/528 unguarded). Verified end-to-end on 2.23.1.
Verification
The maintainer's proposed fix (reject send_pktsize == 0 in connection.py_process_channel_open / _process_channel_open_confirmation) was applied to
2.23.1 and re-tested end-to-end over TCP:
- Unpatched: malicious server (paramiko forcing
max_packet_size=0in
OPEN_CONFIRMATION) + real asyncssh client → client event loop wedges. - Patched: the guard fires inside
_process_channel_open_confirmation, the
malicious value is rejected, the connection closes cleanly
(ChannelOpenError: SSH connection closed), and the client does not wedge.
The maintainer (Ron Frederick) independently confirmed the freeze and noted that
even shutting the server down does not break clients out of the loop.
Reproducers available: a focused harness driving the realSSHChannel._flush_send_buf with _send_pktsize=0, and an end-to-endmalicious_server.py (paramiko) + client.py (real asyncssh) pair. The
end-to-end client repro uses asyncio.new_event_loop() (not get_event_loop())
for Python 3.14 compatibility.
Suggested fix (maintainer's approach)
In connection.py, after each send_pktsize = packet.get_uint32() in_process_channel_open and _process_channel_open_confirmation:
if send_pktsize == 0:
raise ProtocolError('Invalid maximum packet size')
CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H (6.5 Medium). An earlier draft
quoted 7.5 High ("100% CPU"); the synchronous loop burns ~100% of one core's
worth of CPU but, being single-threaded, the OS scheduler spreads it across
cores, so the real impact is event-loop / connection freeze, not machine-wide
CPU exhaustion.
References
- RFC 4254 §5.1 (channel "maximum packet size"; behavior for 0 is undefined).
- The same
maximum packet size = 0send-loop wedge was confirmed in several
other independent SSH implementations (different languages/runtimes) and
reported to each maintainer separately.
Credits
Reported by zhangph (afldl), 2026-06-20.
```
Impact
- Client vector (primary): a malicious SSH server replies to the client's
channel open withmaximum packet size = 0; the client wedges on its first
channel write. The attacker is the server, so it needs no valid credentials. - Server vector: an authenticated client opens a channel with
maximum packet size = 0; any server-side channel write wedges the AsyncSSH
server's event loop, freezing every current and future connection. A
single low-privilege account can take the whole server down.
Both vectors are a single SSH message, deterministic, and cause total
availability loss for the affected process.
CVE-2026-62949 has a CVSS score of 6.5 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.24.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-62949? CVE-2026-62949 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in asyncssh (pip), affecting versions <= 2.23.1. It is fixed in 2.24.0.
- How severe is CVE-2026-62949? CVE-2026-62949 has a CVSS score of 6.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of asyncssh are affected by CVE-2026-62949? asyncssh (pip) versions <= 2.23.1 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-62949? Yes. CVE-2026-62949 is fixed in 2.24.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-62949 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-62949 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-62949 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-62949? Upgrade
asyncsshto 2.24.0 or later.