CVE-2026-105741

CVE-2026-105741 is a high-severity security vulnerability in langflow (pip), affecting versions >= 1.5.0, < 1.10.3. It is fixed in 1.10.3.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Langflow: IP Spoofing Bypass via X-Forwarded-For Allowing Remote Configuration Write

Description:

An IP spoofing vulnerability in the Model Context Protocol (MCP) configuration installation endpoint (POST /api/v1/mcp/project/{project_id}/install) allowed authenticated remote attackers to bypass the "local-only" access restriction. By sending a spoofed X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1 header, an attacker could make the server treat the request as originating from localhost, letting them write/overwrite an MCP client configuration file on the server's filesystem.

Details

The vulnerability lived in the get_client_ip helper, used to enforce the local-only gate for install_mcp_config. It trusted the leftmost (fully client-controlled) entry of X-Forwarded-For unconditionally, with no check for whether the request had actually passed through a trusted proxy.

Vulnerable code (introduced by commit d3d06be8e5, first released in v1.5.0): src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/mcp_projects.py

def get_client_ip(request: Request) -> str:
    # Check for X-Forwarded-For header (common when behind proxies)
    forwarded_for = request.headers.get("X-Forwarded-For")
    if forwarded_for:
        # The client IP is the first one in the list
        return forwarded_for.split(",")[0].strip()
    if request.client:
        return request.client.host
    return "255.255.255.255"


@router.post("/{project_id}/install")
async def install_mcp_config(
    project_id: UUID,
    body: MCPInstallRequest,        # {client: str, transport: "sse" | "streamablehttp" | None}
    request: Request,
    current_user: CurrentActiveMCPUser,
):
    client_ip = get_client_ip(request)
    if not is_local_ip(client_ip):
        raise HTTPException(status_code=500, detail="MCP configuration can only be installed from a local connection")
    ...

Correction vs. the original report: the request body accepted by this endpoint is MCPInstallRequest {client: str, transport: str | None} (src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/schemas/__init__.py). There is no mcp_path field, and the destination path is never attacker-supplied. install_mcp_config resolves the write target itself, via get_config_path(body.client), to one of a fixed, small set of well-known per-OS developer-tool config paths under the server process's home directory: ~/.cursor/mcp.json (Cursor), ~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json (Windsurf), or the Claude Desktop config (~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json on macOS, %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json on Windows/WSL). The impact is therefore "attacker-influenced content written into one of these fixed files," not an arbitrary-path write.

PoC

  1. Authenticate to obtain a valid access token.
  2. Identify a project_id the attacker has access to.
  3. Send:
    curl -X POST "http://<server-ip>:7860/api/v1/mcp/project/<project_id>/install" \
         -H "Authorization: Bearer <token>" \
         -H "X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1" \
         -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
         -d '{"client": "cursor"}'
    
  4. The server returns 200 OK and writes/overwrites ~/.cursor/mcp.json on the host with an attacker-influenced MCP server entry, despite the request originating from a remote, non-local address.

Status: already fixed

This exact bypass (single-line, comma-separated X-Forwarded-For spoofing, default configuration) is fixed as of:

  • Fix PR: langflow-ai/langflow#13915, "fix(security): stop trusting X-Forwarded-For for the MCP install locality check", landed as part of the broader hardening effort in langflow-ai/langflow#13530.
  • Fix: get_client_ip now uses the real TCP peer (request.client.host) by default and ignores X-Forwarded-For entirely unless the operator has explicitly opted in via the rate_limit_trust_proxy setting (default False); when opted in, it takes the rightmost entry, mirroring langflow.services.rate_limit.service.get_client_ip.
  • Released in: v1.11.0, and backported to v1.10.3 (langflow-ai/langflow#14071).
  • Related follow-up: a narrower, related bypass, reachable only when an operator has explicitly set rate_limit_trust_proxy=true behind a proxy that emits X-Forwarded-For as repeated header lines rather than a single comma-separated line (e.g. HAProxy's option forwardfor), was separately closed by langflow-ai/langflow#14425, released in v1.11.3. This does not affect default deployments (rate_limit_trust_proxy defaults to False).
  • This report is a near-duplicate of GHSA-qvvj-g573-9638, which describes the same root cause and is fixed by the same PR.

Affected versions

  • The vulnerable endpoint/helper was introduced in v1.5.0 (langflow-ai/langflow#8271, "add one click install to mcp servers on specific clients", 2025-07-08). Versions prior to v1.5.0 do not contain this endpoint and are not affected by this issue.
  • Vulnerable: >= 1.5.0, < 1.10.3 (and < 1.11.0 on mainline).
  • Fixed: v1.10.3 (backport) and v1.11.0 onward.

Impact

Authenticated Remote Configuration Write to one of a fixed set of IDE/MCP client config files on the host. Could be leveraged to:

  • Inject a malicious MCP server definition into Cursor/Windsurf/Claude Desktop config, so a local developer who later opens that IDE on the host connects to an attacker-controlled MCP server.
  • Disrupt or corrupt the existing MCP configuration for those tools.
  • Bypass an intended network-boundary control ("local-only").

CVE-2026-105741 has a CVSS score of 7.1 (High). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.10.3); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

langflow (>= 1.5.0, < 1.10.3)

Security releases

langflow → 1.10.3 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade langflow to 1.10.3 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-105741? CVE-2026-105741 is a high-severity security vulnerability in langflow (pip), affecting versions >= 1.5.0, < 1.10.3. It is fixed in 1.10.3.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-105741? CVE-2026-105741 has a CVSS score of 7.1 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of langflow are affected by CVE-2026-105741? langflow (pip) versions >= 1.5.0, < 1.10.3 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-105741? Yes. CVE-2026-105741 is fixed in 1.10.3. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-105741 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-105741 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-105741 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-105741? Upgrade langflow to 1.10.3 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in langflow

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.