Summary
ewe Has Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers (HTTP Request/Response Splitting)
The encode_headers function in src/ewe/internal/encoder.gleam directly interpolates response header keys and values into raw HTTP bytes without validating or stripping CRLF (\r\n) sequences. An application that passes user-controlled data into response headers (e.g., setting a Location redirect header from a request parameter) allows an attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP response content, leading to response splitting, cache poisoning, and possible cross-site scripting.
Notably, ewe does validate CRLF in incoming request headers via validate_field_value() in the HTTP/1.1 parser, but provides no equivalent protection for outgoing response headers in the encoder.
Details
File: src/ewe/internal/encoder.gleam
Vulnerable code:
fn encode_headers(headers: List(#(String, String))) -> BitArray {
let headers =
list.fold(headers, <<>>, fn(acc, headers) {
let #(key, value) = headers
<<acc:bits, key:utf8, ": ", value:utf8, "\r\n">>
})
<<headers:bits, "\r\n">>
}
Both key and value are embedded directly into the BitArray output. If either contains \r\n, the resulting bytes become a structurally valid but attacker-controlled HTTP response, terminating the current header early and injecting new headers or a second HTTP response.
Contrast with request parsing (src/ewe/internal/http1.gleam): incoming header values are protected:
use value <- try(
validate_field_value(value) |> replace_error(InvalidHeaders)
)
No analogous validation exists for outgoing header values in the encoder. The solution is to strip or reject \r (0x0D) and \n (0x0A) from all header key and value strings in encode_headers before encoding, mirroring the validation already applied to incoming request headers via validate_field_value()
PoC
An ewe application echoes a user-supplied redirect URL into a Location header:
fn handle_request(req: Request) -> Response {
let redirect_url =
request.get_query(req)
|> result.try(list.key_find(_, "next"))
|> result.unwrap("/home")
response.new(302)
|> response.set_header("location", redirect_url)
|> response.set_body(ewe.Empty)
}
Attacker request:
printf 'GET /?next=https://example.com%%0d%%0aX-Injected:%%20true HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: localhost\r\n\r\n' | nc -w 2 localhost 8080
Resulting response:
HTTP/1.1 302 Found
location: https://example.com
X-Injected: true
content-length: 0
date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 07:53:00 GMT
connection: keep-alive
The X-Injected: true header appears as a separate response header, confirming that CRLF sequences in user input are not sanitized by the encoder.
Impact
CVE-2026-34715 has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (3.0.6); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-34715? CVE-2026-34715 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in ewe (erlang), affecting versions < 3.0.6. It is fixed in 3.0.6.
- How severe is CVE-2026-34715? CVE-2026-34715 has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of ewe are affected by CVE-2026-34715? ewe (erlang) versions < 3.0.6 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-34715? Yes. CVE-2026-34715 is fixed in 3.0.6. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-34715 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-34715 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-34715 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-34715? Upgrade
eweto 3.0.6 or later.