Summary
ip-address has XSS in Address6 HTML-emitting methods
Address6.group() and Address6.link() do not HTML-escape attacker-controlled content before embedding it in the HTML strings they return, and AddressError.parseMessage (emitted by the Address6 constructor for invalid input) can contain unescaped attacker-controlled content in one branch. An application that (1) passes untrusted input to Address6 and (2) renders the output of these methods, or the thrown error's parseMessage, as HTML (e.g. via innerHTML) is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. A related issue in v6.helpers.spanAll() produced malformed markup but was not exploitable; it is hardened in the same release for consistency.
Details
Four related issues were identified and fixed together:
Address6.group(): zone ID injection. TheAddress6constructor stores the raw input (including any IPv6 zone ID) inthis.addressbefore zone stripping.group()then passedthis.addresstohelpers.simpleGroup(), which wrapped each:-separated segment in a<span>element without HTML-escaping the content. A zone ID containing HTML markup was embedded verbatim.Address6.link({ prefix, className }): attribute-value injection.link()concatenated user-suppliedprefixandclassNameinto thehref="…"andclass="…"attributes without escaping. A caller passing untrusted content through these options could inject event handlers (e.g.onmouseover) and achieve XSS.Address6constructor: leading-zero IPv4 error path. The leading-zero branch inparse4in6()builtAddressError.parseMessageby concatenating the raw address throughString.replace(). Becauseparse4in6()runs before the bad-character check, any characters in the groups preceding the IPv4 suffix flowed into the error's HTML unescaped. Consumers who renderparseMessageas HTML (its documented purpose, it already contains<span class="parse-error">markup) could be XSS'd by a crafted input such as<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>:10.0.01.1.v6.helpers.spanAll(): attribute-value injection (defense in depth).spanAll()embedded each character of its input into aclass="digit value-${n} …"attribute without escaping. Becausesplit('')limitsnto a single character this was not exploitable in practice, but it produced malformed markup and is fixed for consistency.
Affected Versions
All versions up to and including 10.1.0.
Patched Version
10.1.1.
PoC
const { Address6 } = require('ip-address');
const addr = new Address6('fe80::1%<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>');
document.body.innerHTML = addr.group(); // fires the onerror handler in 10.1.0
Workarounds
If users cannot upgrade immediately:
- Do not pass untrusted input to the
Address6constructor, or - Never render the output of
group(),link(), orspanAll(), nor theparseMessagefield of any thrownAddressError, as HTML; treat these values as text only, or run them through DOMPurify before inserting into the DOM (DOMPurify's default configuration preserves the library's intended<span>wrapping while stripping any injected event handlers), or - Validate input with
Address6.isValid()and reject anything that contains a zone identifier (a%character) or characters outside[0-9a-fA-F:/]before passing it to the constructor.
Lack of separate CVEs
Given the evidence that these methods are not used, and given that they are all of the same construction, maintainers do not think it's relevant or useful to create a separate CVE for each library method.
Credit
ip-address thanks @scovetta for reporting this issue.
Impact
Real-world exposure is believed to be extremely limited. Analysis of all 425 dependent npm packages as well as GitHub code search found zero consumers of group(), link(), or spanAll(): these HTML-emitting surfaces appear to be unused across published npm packages and public repositories. Applications using only the address-parsing and comparison APIs (isValid, correctForm, isInSubnet, bigInt, etc.) are not affected.
Consumers who do render the output of group(), link(), spanAll(), or AddressError.parseMessage as HTML against untrusted input should upgrade.
Untrusted input is rendered as active markup in a victim's browser, which can run script in their session. Typical impact: session or credential theft, and actions taken as the user.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-42338? CVE-2026-42338 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ip-address (npm), affecting versions <= 10.1.0. It is fixed in 10.1.1. Untrusted input is rendered as active markup in a victim's browser, which can run script in their session.
- Which versions of ip-address are affected by CVE-2026-42338? ip-address (npm) versions <= 10.1.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-42338? Yes. CVE-2026-42338 is fixed in 10.1.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-42338 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-42338 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-42338 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-42338? Upgrade
ip-addressto 10.1.1 or later.