CVE-2026-69088

CVE-2026-69088 is a high-severity code injection vulnerability in getgrav/grav (composer), affecting versions >= 2.0.7, <= 2.0.10. It is fixed in 2.0.11.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Grav: Incomplete callable validation in blueprint dynamic fields allows arbitrary static method invocation and file disclosure

Grav CMS's blueprint dynamic-field callable guard can be bypassed with a fully-qualified Class::method string, letting an account with only page-editing rights (admin.pages, not super-admin) plant a directive in a page's form-field frontmatter that invokes an arbitrary public static PHP method with attacker-controlled arguments. Using built-in gadget methods this yields, at minimum, arbitrary reading of any server-readable file (disclosed to anonymous visitors of the crafted page) and arbitrary creation/copying of files and directories under the web-server account.

Details

Blueprint::isSafeDynamicCall() (system/src/Grav/Common/Data/Blueprint.php, method around line 488) is meant to block dangerous callables named in a blueprint's dynamic-field directives (data-*@). It only consults its dangerous-name denylist when the callable string does not contain :::

if (is_string($function) && !str_contains($function, '::') && Utils::isDangerousFunction($function)) {
    return false;
}

Any callable string containing ::, i.e. every Class::method static call, skips the check entirely and is passed to call_user_func_array() at Blueprint::dynamicData() (Blueprint.php, around line 461) and FlexDirectory::dynamicDataField() (system/src/Grav/Framework/Flex/FlexDirectory.php, around line 937). There is no allowlist restricting which classes or methods may be invoked this way; only the call's arguments are (separately) scanned for smuggled dangerous callables, never the target itself.

Utils::isDangerousFunction() (system/src/Grav/Common/Utils.php) classifies any string containing a colon (str_contains($name, ":")) or a namespace backslash as dangerous, so a qualified Class::method string would be rejected if it ever reached this function. The !str_contains($function, '::') condition in isSafeDynamicCall() ensures it never does, which is what leaves qualified static calls entirely unscreened. (Whether the exemption was intended to admit legitimate Class::method option-providers is a plausible reading of the surrounding code, but the intent is not established here.)

This is an incomplete fix of two recently published advisories, one addressing page editors executing hidden callables via form-field settings, the other extending the same guard to Flex directories. The guard those fixes introduced never covered qualified static calls. Grav's own permission model separates page-content code execution into a distinct, higher privilege (admin.pages_twig) from plain page editing (admin.pages), so invoking arbitrary methods from an admin.pages-authored page is a genuine trust-boundary bypass, not editor capability by design.

PoC

Tested on Grav develop at commit db8c1fc (which self-reports version 2.0.11) with the admin and form plugins, using an account granted only admin.login + admin.pages (page editor, not super-admin). The same guard is present in every current release from 2.0.7 through 2.0.10. Base URL shown as https://grav.example.

A. Arbitrary file read (confidentiality)

  1. Log in to /admin as the page-editor account (GET /admin for the login nonce, then POST task=login).
  2. Save a page via the standard admin endpoint, POST /admin/pages/<route> with the session cookie, the admin nonce, and data[frontmatter] containing a form field with a download gadget directive:
    forms:
      x:
        fields:
          y:
            type: text
            data-opts@:
              - 'Grav\Common\Utils::download'
              - '/etc/passwd'
              - false
              - 0
              - 1024
              - mime: 'text/plain'
    
    The server returns HTTP 200 and accepts the save, the data-opts@ directive is not rejected.
  3. As an unauthenticated visitor (no cookies), request the saved page, e.g. GET /<route> (use a fresh query string to avoid a cached copy; immediately after saving, a first request may 404 while the flat-file page index catches up, retry moments later). The response is HTTP 200 with the raw contents of /etc/passwd in the body (root:x:0:0:...). Pointing the path at user/accounts/<name>.yaml instead returns that account file, including its hashed_password: bcrypt line, i.e. an anonymous visitor obtains a stored administrator's password hash.

B. Arbitrary file/directory write (integrity), verified

Using the same mechanism with Grav\Common\Filesystem\Folder::copy (a public static method taking source and destination paths), a page editor caused the server to copy an existing page directory to an attacker-chosen new path under user/pages/; the newly created page then rendered its (attacker-controlled) content at the new route over plain HTTP. This demonstrates attacker-controlled creation of files/directories anywhere the web-server account can write. Folder::move and Folder::delete are equally reachable (their destructive nature was not exercised).

Impact

A page editor (an admin.pages-only account, not super-admin) can, through a page they author:

  • Read any server-readable file, disclosed to any anonymous, unauthenticated visitor of the crafted page, including user/accounts/*.yaml, which stores account metadata and bcrypt password hashes. An attacker may attempt offline cracking of a disclosed hash; recovery of a weak or reused administrator password could lead to full admin-panel compromise. Other secrets on disk (site/plugin config, environment files) are equally exposed.
  • Create or overwrite files and directories under the web-server account (demonstrated via Folder::copy), with Folder::move/Folder::delete additionally reachable for destructive tampering.

Because the guard permits any public static method, the reachable impact is bounded only by the gadget surface of the loaded codebase, not by this report's demonstrated cases.

Untrusted input is evaluated as executable code within the application's runtime environment. Typical impact: arbitrary code execution within the application's privilege context.

CVE-2026-69088 has a CVSS score of 8.1 (High). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.0.11); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

getgrav/grav (>= 2.0.7, <= 2.0.10)

Security releases

getgrav/grav → 2.0.11 (composer)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade getgrav/grav to 2.0.11 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-69088? CVE-2026-69088 is a high-severity code injection vulnerability in getgrav/grav (composer), affecting versions >= 2.0.7, <= 2.0.10. It is fixed in 2.0.11. Untrusted input is evaluated as executable code within the application's runtime environment.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-69088? CVE-2026-69088 has a CVSS score of 8.1 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of getgrav/grav are affected by CVE-2026-69088? getgrav/grav (composer) versions >= 2.0.7, <= 2.0.10 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-69088? Yes. CVE-2026-69088 is fixed in 2.0.11. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-69088 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-69088 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-69088 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-69088? Upgrade getgrav/grav to 2.0.11 or later.

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.