Summary
SiYuan: Non-administrator responses from /api/system/getConf omit three secrets that the configuration-export path explicitly strips, disclosing the session-cookie signing key and the OS username to anonymous readers
CVE: This vulnerability corresponds to CVE-2026-72793.
/api/system/getConf is registered with CheckAuth only and is reachable by the publish RoleReader token, and anonymously when Publish.Auth.Enable is false. Its non-administrator masking chain is a blocklist that enumerates fields individually. Three fields that the configuration-export endpoint in the same file deliberately clears are absent from that blocklist and are returned to readers:
| Field | JSON | What it is | Cleared by exportConf at |
|---|---|---|---|
Conf.CookieKey |
cookieKey |
The session-cookie signing key | kernel/api/system.go:360 |
Conf.Export.PandocBin |
export.pandocBin |
Absolute path embedding the OS username | kernel/api/system.go:338 |
Conf.NotebookCrypto |
notebookCrypto |
Encrypted-notebook key material | kernel/api/system.go:360 |
The project has already classified all three as values that must not leave the server. The reader-facing path returns them.
Details
Route. kernel/api/router.go:70 : POST /api/system/getConf → model.CheckAuth → getConf. No CheckReadonly, no CheckAdminRole.
The masking chain, and what each stage covers. getConf masks through GetMaskedConf() → HideConfSecret() (non-administrators) → FilterConfByPublishIgnore() (readers) → a browser-request path strip.
GetMaskedConf:UserData,MCPOAuth,AccessAuthCode.HideConfSecret:AI,Api,Flashcard,ServerAddrs,Publish,Repo,Sync,Secrets,Variables, and the System paths. No reference toCookieKeyorExport.PandocBin.FilterConfByPublishIgnore:UILayoutonly.- Browser strip (
kernel/api/system.go:630-631): System paths only.
Each stage names fields explicitly, so any field nobody thought to add is returned by default.
1. CookieKey: the live session-signing key.
The value is passed straight into the session store at startup:
cli/cmd/serve.go:67 go server.Serve(false, model.Conf.CookieKey)
kernel/server/serve.go:152 sessionStore = cookie.NewStore([]byte(cookieKey))
kernel/server/serve.go:159 ginServer.Use(sessions.Sessions("siyuan", sessionStore))
gin-contrib/sessions/cookie.NewStore constructed with a single key uses that key as the gorilla/securecookie HMAC key. The siyuan session cookie is signed with the value this endpoint hands out, so an attacker holding it can mint and modify session cookies the server accepts as authentic.
Escalating a forged session to administrator additionally requires the forged SessionData to carry the matching AccessAuthCode which is masked or the instance to have no access-auth code configured, which is a common deployment. The unconditional impact, present on every instance, is disclosure of a persistent cryptographic secret to an unauthenticated party. Rotating it invalidates every active session, so it cannot be quietly refreshed.
2. Export.PandocBin: bypasses a shipped privacy control.
The field is an absolute path that embeds the OS username by construction:
conf/export.go:35 PandocBin string `json:"pandocBin"`
model/conf.go:430-431 if "" == Conf.Export.PandocBin { Conf.Export.PandocBin = util.PandocBinPath }
util/pandoc.go:154 PandocBinPath = filepath.Join(tempPandocDir, "bin", "pandoc.exe")
util/pandoc.go:134 tempPandocDir = filepath.Join(TempDir, "pandoc")
util/working.go:359 TempDir = filepath.Join(WorkspaceDir, "temp")
util/working.go:312 defaultWorkspaceDir = filepath.Join(userProfile, "SiYuan")
→ C:\Users\<username>\SiYuan\temp\pandoc\bin\pandoc.exe
This one is notable beyond the disclosure itself, because a control was shipped specifically to prevent it. kernel/api/system.go:630 adds, for browser requests:
if util.IsBrowserRequest(c) {
maskedConf.System.WorkspaceDir = ""
maskedConf.System.AppDir = ""
maskedConf.System.ConfDir = ""
maskedConf.System.DataDir = ""
maskedConf.System.HomeDir = ""
} // 避免泄露用户名等敏感信息
The comment states the goal plainly: avoid leaking the username and other sensitive information. The block enumerates only System.* and misses Export.PandocBin, which carries the same username through the same response. A publish reader is a browser request, so the System paths are blanked while export.pandocBin passes through intact. Where an administrator has configured a custom pandoc location, that path is disclosed instead still a filesystem-layout disclosure.
3. NotebookCrypto. Encrypted-notebook key material is likewise absent from HideConfSecret while exportConf sets it to nil. Reported previously and included here only because it is the third instance of the same root cause; the fix below closes all three together.
The root cause is the blocklist itself. exportConf (kernel/api/system.go:299) clones the configuration and clears each secret before returning it CookieKey, NotebookCrypto, Export.PandocBin, Account, Stat, System.ID, the AI keys. That cloner is the project's own working inventory of what must not leave the server. getConf's non-administrator path maintains a separate, shorter list that has now diverged from it in three places. Any future secret added to the config will default to exposed on the reader path unless someone remembers to extend the blocklist.
Proof of Concept
Precondition: publish mode enabled (default port 6808); anonymous when Publish.Auth.Enable is false, otherwise any publish reader account.
POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/system/getConf
{}
→ 200. The conf object contains:
cookieKey , the session-signing key, cleartext
export.pandocBin , absolute path containing the OS username
notebookCrypto , encrypted-notebook key material
Differential check against the endpoint that strips them, same instance:
POST http://127.0.0.1:6808/api/system/exportConf
→ cookieKey is empty, export.pandocBin is empty, notebookCrypto is null
The same three values are withheld by one endpoint and returned by the other.
Impact
An anonymous reader in publish mode or any publish RoleReader obtains the server's session-cookie signing key, permitting forgery and tampering of session cookies the server validates as authentic, with administrator authentication reachable on instances that have no access-auth code configured. The same response discloses the operating-system username and workspace layout, defeating a control added specifically to prevent that disclosure, and encrypted-notebook key material.
CVE-2026-72793 has a CVSS score of 8.6 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.0.0-20260725132049-2d8b98395a91); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Route non-administrator getConf responses through the exportConf cloner rather than extending HideConfSecret field by field. The cloner already handles every field named here and is the list the project actually maintains; keeping two divergent inventories of the same secrets is what produced all three gaps. If a targeted patch is preferred in the interim, clear CookieKey and NotebookCrypto in HideConfSecret and add Export.PandocBin to the IsBrowserRequest block, then audit the config struct for any remaining absolute-path or secret-bearing field.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-72793? CVE-2026-72793 is a high-severity security vulnerability in github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel (go), affecting versions < 0.0.0-20260725132049-2d8b98395a91. It is fixed in 0.0.0-20260725132049-2d8b98395a91.
- How severe is CVE-2026-72793? CVE-2026-72793 has a CVSS score of 8.6 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel are affected by CVE-2026-72793? github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel (go) versions < 0.0.0-20260725132049-2d8b98395a91 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-72793? Yes. CVE-2026-72793 is fixed in 0.0.0-20260725132049-2d8b98395a91. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-72793 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-72793 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-72793 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-72793? Upgrade
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernelto 0.0.0-20260725132049-2d8b98395a91 or later.