CVE-2024-27933

Use of raw file descriptors in op_node_ipc_pipe() leads to premature close of arbitrary file descriptors, allowing standard input to be re-opened as a different resource resulting in permission prompt bypass.

Details

Node child_process IPC relies on the JS side to pass the raw IPC file descriptor to op_node_ipc_pipe(), which returns a IpcJsonStreamResource ID associated with the file descriptor. On closing the resource, the raw file descriptor is closed together.

Although closing a file descriptor is seemingly a harmless task, this has been known to be exploitable:

• With --allow-read and --allow-write permissions, one can open /dev/ptmx as stdin. This device happily accepts TTY ioctls and pipes anything written into it back to the reader.
  • This has been presented in a hacking competition (WACON 2023 Quals "dino jail").
  • However, the precondition of this challenge was heavily contrived: fd 0 has manually been closed by FFI and setuid() was used to drop permissions and deny access to /proc since global write permissions are usually equivalent to arbitrary code execution (/proc/self/mem).

As this vulnerability conveniently allows us to close stdin (fd 0) without any FFI, we can open any resource that when read returns y, Y or A as its first character (runtimes/permissions/prompter.rs) to bypass the prompt.

There is a caveat however - all stdio/stdin/stderr streams are locked, after which clear_stdin() is called. This invokes libc::tcflush(0, libc::TCIFLUSH) which fails on a non-TTY file descriptor.

This can be exploited by widening the race window between clear_stdin() and the next stdin_lock.read_line(). Notably, the prompt message contains the requested resource name (path) which is filtered by strip_ansi_codes_and_ascii_control(). This is also concatenated by write!() to make a single buffer printed out to stderr. Thus, if we request a very long resource name, the window will widen allowing us to easily and stably race another Worker that closes fd 0 and opens a resource starting with an A\n within the race window.

Note that attacker does not need any permissions to exploit this bug to a full permission prompt bypass, as Cache API can be used to create and open files with controlled content without any permissions. Refer to the Impact section for more details.

PoC

Testing environment is Docker image denoland/deno:alpine-1.39.0@sha256:95064390f2c115673762bfc4fe15b1a7f81c859038b8c02b277ede7cd8a2ccbf.

Below PoC closes stdout (fd 1) and then prints two lines, one on stdout and one on stderr. Only the latter line is shown as stdout file descriptor is closed.

const ops = Deno[Deno.internal].core.ops;

// open fd 1 as ipc stream resource
const rid = ops.op_node_ipc_pipe(1);

// close resource & fd 1
Deno.close(rid);

// this should not be seen (stdout)
console.log('not seen');

// but this is seen (stderr)
console.error('seen');

Below is /proc/$(pgrep deno)/fd right after executing the last line of the above PoC. We see that fd 1 is indeed missing.

total 0
dr-x------ 2 root root 30 Dec 18 07:07 ./
dr-xr-xr-x 9 root root  0 Dec 18 07:07 ../
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 0 -> /dev/pts/0
l-wx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 10 -> 'pipe:[159305]'
lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 11 -> 'pipe:[159306]'
l-wx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 12 -> 'pipe:[159306]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 13 -> /deno-dir/dep_analysis_cache_v1
l-wx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 14 -> 'pipe:[159305]'
l-wx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 15 -> 'pipe:[159306]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 16 -> /deno-dir/node_analysis_cache_v1
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 17 -> /dev/pts/0
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 18 -> /dev/pts/0
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 19 -> /dev/pts/0
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 2 -> /dev/pts/0
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 20 -> 'anon_inode:[eventpoll]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 21 -> 'anon_inode:[eventfd]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 22 -> 'anon_inode:[eventpoll]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 23 -> 'socket:[159302]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 24 -> 'anon_inode:[eventpoll]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 25 -> 'anon_inode:[eventfd]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 26 -> 'anon_inode:[eventpoll]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 27 -> 'socket:[159302]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 28 -> 'socket:[159310]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 29 -> 'socket:[159308]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 3 -> 'anon_inode:[eventpoll]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 30 -> 'socket:[159309]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 4 -> 'anon_inode:[eventfd]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 5 -> 'anon_inode:[eventpoll]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 6 -> 'socket:[159302]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 7 -> 'socket:[159303]'
lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 8 -> 'socket:[159302]'
lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Dec 18 07:07 9 -> 'pipe:[159305]'

Use of raw file descriptors in op_node_ipc_pipe() leads to premature close of arbitrary file descriptors. This allow standard input (fd 0) to be closed and re-opened for a different resource, which allows a silent permission prompt bypass. This is exploitable by an attacker controlling the code executed inside a Deno runtime to obtain arbitrary code execution on the host machine regardless of permissions.

This bug is known to be exploitable - there is a working exploit that achieves arbitrary code execution by bypassing prompts from zero permissions, additionally abusing the fact that Cache API lacks filesystem permission checks. The attack can be conducted silently as stderr can also be closed, suppressing all prompt outputs.

Note that Deno's security model is currently described as follows:

• All runtime I/O is considered to be privileged and must always be guarded by a runtime permission. This includes filesystem access, network access, etc.
  • The only exception to this is runtime storage explosion attacks that are isolated to a part of the file system, caused by evaluated code (for example, caching big dependencies or no limits on runtime caches such as the Web Cache API).

Although it is ambiguous if the fundamental lack of file system permission checks on Web Cache API is a vulnerability or not, the reporter have not reported this as a vulnerability assuming that this is a known risk (or a feature).

Affected version of Deno is 1.39.0.

• Introduced with commit 5a91a06
• Fixed with commit 55fac9f

The application does not correctly enforce access controls, allowing a principal to access resources or operations beyond their granted permissions. Typical impact: unauthorized data access or execution of privileged operations.

CVE-2024-27933 has a CVSS score of 8.2 (High). The vector is requires local access, high privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.39.1); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Kodem intelligence

1. What is CVE-2024-27933? CVE-2024-27933 is a high-severity incorrect authorization vulnerability in deno (rust), affecting versions = 1.39.0. It is fixed in 1.39.1. The application does not correctly enforce access controls, allowing a principal to access resources or operations beyond their granted permissions.
2. How severe is CVE-2024-27933? CVE-2024-27933 has a CVSS score of 8.2 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
3. Which versions of deno are affected by CVE-2024-27933? deno (rust) versions = 1.39.0 is affected.
4. Is there a fix for CVE-2024-27933? Yes. CVE-2024-27933 is fixed in 1.39.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
5. Is CVE-2024-27933 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2024-27933 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
6. What actually determines whether CVE-2024-27933 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
7. How do I fix CVE-2024-27933? Upgrade deno to 1.39.1 or later.