Summary
Workarounds
Sanitize user input before passing it to the addMetadata method: escape XML entities. For example:
let input = "..."
input = input
.replace(/&/g, "&")
.replace(/</g, "<")
.replace(/>/g, ">")
.replace(/"/g, """)
.replace(/'/g, "'")
doc.addMetadata(input)
Impact
User control of the first argument of the addMetadata function allows users to inject arbitrary XML.
If given the possibility to pass unsanitized input to the addMetadata method, a user can inject arbitrary XMP metadata into the generated PDF. If the generated PDF is signed, stored or otherwise processed after, the integrity of the PDF can no longer be guaranteed.
Example attack vector:
import { jsPDF } from "jspdf"
const doc = new jsPDF()
// Input a string that closes the current XML tag and opens a new one.
// We are injecting a fake "dc:creator" (Author) to spoof the document source.
const maliciousInput = '</jspdf:metadata></rdf:Description>' +
'<rdf:Description xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">' +
'<dc:creator>TRUSTED_ADMINISTRATOR</dc:creator>' + // <--- Spoofed Identity
'</rdf:Description>' +
'<rdf:Description><jspdf:metadata>'
// The application innocently adds the user's input to the metadata
doc.addMetadata(maliciousInput, "http://valid.namespace")
doc.save("test.pdf")
The application does not adequately validate input before processing it, allowing unexpected values to reach sensitive code paths. Typical impact: varies by context: data corruption, logic bypass, or denial of service.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Remediation advice
The vulnerability has been fixed in [email protected]
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-24043? CVE-2026-24043 is a medium-severity improper input validation vulnerability in jspdf (npm), affecting versions <= 4.0.0. It is fixed in 4.1.0. The application does not adequately validate input before processing it, allowing unexpected values to reach sensitive code paths.
- Which versions of jspdf are affected by CVE-2026-24043? jspdf (npm) versions <= 4.0.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-24043? Yes. CVE-2026-24043 is fixed in 4.1.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-24043 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-24043 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-24043 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-24043? Upgrade
jspdfto 4.1.0 or later.