CVE-2026-29038

CVE-2026-29038 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in changedetection.io (pip), affecting versions < 0.54.4. It is fixed in 0.54.4.

Summary

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability was identified in the /rss/tag/ endpoint of changedetection.io. The tag_uuid path parameter is reflected directly in the HTTP response body without HTML escaping. Since Flask returns text/html by default for plain string responses, the browser parses and executes injected JavaScript.

This vulnerability persists in version 0.54.1, which patched the related XSS in /rss/watch/ (CVE-2026-27645 / GHSA-mw8m-398g-h89w) but did not address the identical pattern in the tag RSS endpoint.

Package

  • Ecosystem: pip
  • Package: changedetection.io
  • Affected versions: <= 0.54.1
  • Patched versions: (none yet)

Severity

Moderate - CVSS 6.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Details

File: changedetectionio/blueprint/rss/tag.py Line: 36 Source: tag.py @ 1d72716

The tag_uuid parameter from the URL path is interpolated into the response body using an f-string with no escaping:

tag = datastore.data['settings']['application'].get('tags', {}).get(tag_uuid)
if not tag:
    return f"Tag with UUID {tag_uuid} not found", 404  # ← No escaping, Content-Type: text/html

Flask's default Content-Type for plain string responses is text/html; charset=utf-8, so any HTML/JavaScript injected via {tag_uuid} is rendered and executed by the browser.

Relationship to CVE-2026-27645

CVE-2026-27645 (GHSA-mw8m-398g-h89w) addressed the identical vulnerability pattern in /rss/watch/ (single_watch.py). The fix applied in v0.54.1 patched that endpoint but did not fix the same pattern in /rss/tag/ (tag.py). Testing confirms:

  • /rss/watch/ on v0.54.1, Returns generic 404 page, XSS no longer triggers ✅
  • /rss/tag/ on v0.54.1, XSS payload still fires, vulnerability confirmed ❌

Attack Vector

The attack requires a valid RSS access token, which is a 32-character hex string exposed in the <link> HTML tag on the homepage without authentication:

  1. Attacker visits the target's homepage (if unauthenticated) and extracts the RSS token from the <link> tag

  2. Crafts a malicious URL:

    http://target:5000/rss/tag/<img src=x onerror=alert(document.cookie)>?token=EXTRACTED_TOKEN
    
  3. Sends the link to a victim who has an active session on the changedetection.io instance

  4. When the victim clicks the link, the server responds with:

    Tag with UUID <img src=x onerror=alert(document.cookie)> not found
    
  5. The browser renders the <img> tag, the onerror fires, and JavaScript executes in the victim's session context

Proof of Concept

Request

GET /rss/tag/%3Cimg%20src%3Dx%20onerror%3Dalert(document.domain)%3E?token=60b83b06df98b24c66367bc3d233105b HTTP/1.1
Host: localhost:5000

Response

HTTP/1.1 404 NOT FOUND
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

Tag with UUID <img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)> not found

The XSS payload is reflected unescaped in an HTML response. The browser executes alert(document.domain) and displays "localhost", confirming JavaScript execution.

Tested on: changedetection.io v0.54.1 (Docker, localhost, Feb 25, 2026)

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6db07f6a-6df8-48a7-a597-9f39dfa1bb29

Option A: HTML Escape (Recommended)

from markupsafe import escape

if not tag:
    return f"Tag with UUID {escape(tag_uuid)} not found", 404

Option B: Set Content-Type to text/plain

from flask import make_response

if not tag:
    resp = make_response(f"Tag with UUID {tag_uuid} not found", 404)
    resp.headers['Content-Type'] = 'text/plain; charset=utf-8'
    return resp

Credits

References

Impact

  • Session cookie theft via document.cookie exfiltration
  • Account takeover if session cookies lack the HttpOnly flag
  • Phishing via crafted links that appear to originate from a trusted changedetection.io instance
  • Low exploitation barrier - the RSS token is obtainable without authentication from the homepage <link> tag
  • Widespread exposure - prior scanning of internet-facing instances (during CVE-2026-27645 research) identified 500+ publicly accessible deployments

Untrusted input is rendered as active markup in a victim's browser, which can run script in their session. Typical impact: session or credential theft, and actions taken as the user.

CVE-2026-29038 has a CVSS score of 6.1 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.54.4); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

changedetection.io (< 0.54.4)

Security releases

changedetection.io → 0.54.4 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

See it in your environment

Remediation advice

Escape the tag_uuid parameter before reflecting it in the response, or set the Content-Type to text/plain:

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-29038? CVE-2026-29038 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in changedetection.io (pip), affecting versions < 0.54.4. It is fixed in 0.54.4. Untrusted input is rendered as active markup in a victim's browser, which can run script in their session.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-29038? CVE-2026-29038 has a CVSS score of 6.1 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of changedetection.io are affected by CVE-2026-29038? changedetection.io (pip) versions < 0.54.4 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-29038? Yes. CVE-2026-29038 is fixed in 0.54.4. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-29038 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-29038 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-29038 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-29038? Upgrade changedetection.io to 0.54.4 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in changedetection.io

CVE-2026-41895CVE-2026-35490CVE-2026-33981CVE-2026-29065CVE-2026-29039

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.